Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
  • Letter

Modulation vector of the Fulde-Ferrell-Larkin-Ovchinnikov state in CeCoIn5 revealed by high-resolution magnetostriction measurements

Shunichiro Kittaka, Yohei Kono, Kaito Tsunashima, Daisuke Kimoto, Makoto Yokoyama, Yusei Shimizu, Toshiro Sakakibara, Minoru Yamashita, and Kazushige Machida
Phys. Rev. B 107, L220505 – Published 30 June 2023
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

The Fulde-Ferrell-Larkin-Ovchinnikov (FFLO) state is an exotic superconducting phase formed by Cooper pairs with finite center-of-mass momentum q. On theoretical grounds, the superconducting order parameter in the FFLO state is spatially modulated along the q vector, and the emergence of an associated anisotropy is expected at the phase transition from the Abrikosov state to the FFLO state. Here, we report the results of high-resolution magnetostriction measurements for a single crystal of CeCoIn5 around Bc. We find two anomalies in the magnetostriction along the c axis, parallel to the magnetic-field orientation. In sharp contrast, this BK anomaly disappears in the magnetostriction along the a-axis direction, perpendicular to the magnetic-field orientation. To explain this uniaxial expansion, we suggest a possibility that the FFLO transition occurs slightly below the upper critical field, and the FFLO modulation vector parallel to the applied magnetic field gives rise to the anisotropic response.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 13 April 2023
  • Revised 13 June 2023
  • Accepted 20 June 2023

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.L220505

©2023 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Shunichiro Kittaka, Yohei Kono, Kaito Tsunashima, and Daisuke Kimoto

  • Department of Physics, Chuo University, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 112-8551, Japan

Makoto Yokoyama

  • Faculty of Science, Ibaraki University, Mito, Ibaraki 310-8512, Japan and Institute of Quantum Beam Science, Ibaraki University, Mito, Ibaraki 310-8512, Japan

Yusei Shimizu

  • Institute for Materials Research (IMR), Tohoku University, Oarai, Ibaraki 311-1313, Japan

Toshiro Sakakibara and Minoru Yamashita

  • Institute for Solid State Physics, University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8581, Japan

Kazushige Machida

  • Department of Physics, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Shiga 525-8577, Japan

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 107, Iss. 22 — 1 June 2023

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    The c-axis magnetostriction coefficient λc(B)=(Lc/B)/Lc at several temperatures for Bc. Each set of data is shifted vertically by 104T1 for clarity. Closed (open) circles represent the data taken in the field-increasing (-decreasing) processes. Inset shows a schematic image of the spatial modulation of the order parameter Δ(r) in the FFLO state along the modulation vector q.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Thermal expansion ΔLc/Lc measured at 5, 4.89, 4.85, 4.8, 4.7, 4.5, 4.3, and 4 T (from bottom to top) for Bc. Closed and open circles represent the data taken in the warming and cooling processes, respectively. Inset shows temperature dependence of the thermal expansion coefficient αc=(Lc/T)/Lc along the c axis at 0 T.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    (a) Field-temperature phase diagram of CeCoIn5 for Bc. (b) Field dependence of dλc/dB at several temperatures. Both increasing and decreasing field data are shown above 0.2 K (only the former at 0.11 K). Each set of data in (b) is shifted vertically by 5×103T2 for clarity. The positions of Bc2 [squares in (a)] and BK (triangles) are determined by large and small peaks in dλc/dB, respectively, as indicated by solid arrows in (b). The symbols shown in red (blue) are determined from the field-increasing (-decreasing) data. Crosses represent the field above which λc(B) starts to change markedly toward BK with increasing B, possibly corresponding to a boundary between the Abrikosov state and the FFLO state.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4

    Field angle ϕ dependence of (a) ΔLi/Li at 0.11 K and 5 T, and (b) their field-angle derivatives, λϕ,i=(Li/ϕ)/Li (i=a or c). Closed (open) symbols represent the data taken in the ϕ-increasing (decreasing) process. The gray solid line in (b) represents the simulation spectrum consisting of two Gaussian functions (dashed and dash-dotted lines). Inset in (a) shows a schematic view of the flux lines and the FFLO modulation. The periodic nodal planes, separated by L=2π/q, run perpendicular to the flux lines that form a vortex lattice in the ab plane. Inset in (b) shows a wider view of λϕ,i(ϕ) in the ϕ-increasing (-decreasing) process for ϕ>0 (ϕ<0).

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 5
    Figure 5

    (a) The wave number q normalized by the coherent length and (b) the normalized entropy S=Ss(T)/Sn(Tc) as a function of h=H/Hc2, taken from Ref. [36]. Here, Ss (Sn) is the entropy in the superconducting (normal) state. (c) |λc| as a function of B at T=0.06K for Bc. (d) |αc| as a function of T at B=4.73T for Bc. (e) |λϕ,c| as a function of the angle ϕ at B=4.94T and T=0.11K. The yellow and the pink colored regions represent the Abrikosov state and the FFLO state, respectively; the boundary in |λc| and |λϕ,c| (|αc|) is determined by the onset of the BK anomaly [inferred from the phase diagram in Fig. 3].

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×