Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Interaction of acoustic and optical phonons in a soft-bonded Cu-Se framework of large unit cell minerals with anionic disorders

Kewal Singh Rana, Raveena Gupta, Debattam Sarkar, Niraj Kumar Singh, Somnath Acharya, Satish Vitta, Chandan Bera, Kanishka Biswas, and Ajay Soni
Phys. Rev. B 108, 045202 – Published 19 July 2023
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

In general, optical and acoustic phonons have different energy scaling and are separated by an energy gap. However, the two phonon branches can also interact and provide an inherently poor thermal conductivity in complex minerals with a large number of atoms per unit cell. For instance, the copper-chalcogenide based minerals with high crystalline anharmonicity are inherently poor thermal conductors. We have studied large unit cell Cu26Nb2Sn6Se32, Cu26Nb2Sn6Se31.5, and Cu26Nb2Sn6Se30Te2 synthetic minerals with a strategically tailored anionic disorder. These compounds have a p-type degenerate behavior with carrier concentration (2.715.3)×1020cm3, at 300 K and a very low lattice thermal conductivity, (0.761.49)Wm1K1 at 625K. Here, the softening of Cu-Se bonds and hence the crystal framework play an important role for very poor thermal conductivity. The existence of two low frequency Raman active optical modes (at 55 and 72cm1) associated with soft Cu and Se atoms, three localized Einstein modes in specific heat, suggest a high scattering of acoustic and optical branches with very short phonon lifetime (0.30.6ps). The excess vibrational density of states at low energies with compressed and flat optical branches strongly hinders the heat transport. The involvement of the Te atom at Se sites results in a lowering of the acoustic phonon cutoff frequency and the softening of optical phonons, significantly. Overall, Cu26Nb2Sn6Se30Te2 has the lowest thermal conductivity at 625K and is a promising thermoelectric material because of robust acoustic-optical phonon scattering, very low sound velocity, and high crystalline anharmonicity.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 22 April 2023
  • Revised 25 June 2023
  • Accepted 28 June 2023

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.108.045202

©2023 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Kewal Singh Rana1, Raveena Gupta2, Debattam Sarkar3, Niraj Kumar Singh1, Somnath Acharya4, Satish Vitta4, Chandan Bera2, Kanishka Biswas3, and Ajay Soni1,*

  • 1School of Physical Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Mandi, Mandi 175075, Himachal Pradesh, India
  • 2Institute of Nano Science and Technology, Knowledge City, Sahibzada Ajit Singh Nagar, 140306 Punjab, India
  • 3New Chemistry Unit, School of Advanced Materials and International Centre of Materials Science, Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research (JNCASR), Jakkur, Bangalore 560064, India
  • 4Department of Metallurgical Engineering and Materials Science, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai 400076, India

  • *Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: ajay@iitmandi.ac.in

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 108, Iss. 4 — 15 July 2023

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    (a) Powder XRD pattern of CNSSe32, CNSSe31.5, and CNSSe30Te2, (b) enlarged 222 peak showing lattice expansion of CNSSe30Te2 and contraction of CNSSe31.5 with respect to CNSSe32, and (c) cubic crystal structure of CNSSe32.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    The bright field HR-TEM images of (a) CNSSe32, (b) CNSSe31.5, and (c) CNSSe30Te2.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    (a) Room temperature Raman spectra of CNSSe32, CNSSe31.5, and CNSSe30Te2 in the low frequency region. The black curve represents the experimental data, blue and red curves are the individual and commutative peak fit. (b) The phonon dispersion curve and (c) atom-projected DOS for CNSSe32. (d) The phonon dispersion curve and (e) atom-projected DOS for CNSSe30Te2.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4

    Temperature dependence of (a) ρ, (b) S; inset represents the power factor S2/ρ and electronic band structure of (c) CNSSe32 and (d) CNSSe30Te2.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 5
    Figure 5

    Temperature dependence of (a) κtotal and (b) κl.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 6
    Figure 6

    Temperature dependence of heat capacity fitted with one Debye and three Einstein modes for (a) CNSSe32, (b) CNSSe31.5, (c) CNSSe30Te2, and (d) Cp/T3 vs T plot.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 7
    Figure 7

    Comparison of the κl of CNSSe30Te2 sample with other copper-based chalcogenide materials at 625 K [17, 19, 24, 25, 32, 37, 40, 45, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81].

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×