Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Tunneling magnetoresistance in magnetic tunnel junctions with a single ferromagnetic electrode

Kartik Samanta, Yuan-Yuan Jiang, Tula R. Paudel, Ding-Fu Shao, and Evgeny Y. Tsymbal
Phys. Rev. B 109, 174407 – Published 3 May 2024
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

Magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJs) are key components of spintronic devices, such as magnetic random-access memories. Normally, MTJs consist of two ferromagnetic (FM) electrodes separated by an insulating barrier layer. Their key functional property is tunneling magnetoresistance (TMR), which is a change in MTJ's resistance when magnetization of the two electrodes alters from parallel to antiparallel. Here, we demonstrate that TMR can occur in MTJs with a single FM electrode, provided that the counterelectrode is an antiferromagnetic (AFM) metal that supports a spin-split band structure and/or a Néel spin current. Using RuO2 as a representative example of such antiferromagnet and CrO2 as a FM metal, we design all-rutile RuO2/TiO2/CrO2 MTJs to reveal a nonvanishing TMR. Our first-principles calculations predict that magnetization reversal in CrO2 significantly changes conductance of the MTJs stacked in the (110) or (001) planes. The predicted giant TMR effect of about 1000% in the (110)-oriented MTJs stems from spin-dependent conduction channels in CrO2 (110) and RuO2 (110), whose matching alters with CrO2 magnetization orientation, while TMR in the (001)-oriented MTJs originates from the Néel spin currents and different effective TiO2 barrier thickness for two magnetic sublattices that can be engineered by the alternating deposition of TiO2 and CrO2 monolayers. Our results demonstrate a possibility of a sizable TMR in MTJs with a single FM electrode and offer a practical test for using the antiferromagnet RuO2 in functional spintronic devices.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 8 October 2023
  • Accepted 12 April 2024

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.109.174407

©2024 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Kartik Samanta1,*,†, Yuan-Yuan Jiang2,3,*, Tula R. Paudel4, Ding-Fu Shao2,‡, and Evgeny Y. Tsymbal1,§

  • 1Department of Physics and Astronomy & Nebraska Center for Materials and Nanoscience, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588, USA
  • 2Key Laboratory of Materials Physics, Institute of Solid-State Physics, HFIPS, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China
  • 3University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
  • 4Department of Physics, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, South Dakota 57701, USA

  • *These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • ksamanta2@unl.edu
  • dfshao@issp.ac.cn
  • §tsymbal@unl.edu

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 109, Iss. 17 — 1 May 2024

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article part of CHORUS

Accepted manuscript will be available starting 3 May 2025.
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Schematics of TMR in MTJs with a single FM electrode and an AFM counterelectrode. (a) TMR due to the anisotropic Fermi surface along a low-symmetry transport direction in an AFM electrode representing RuO2 (110). Arrows indicate FM magnetization and double arrows indicate the Néel vector of the AFM layer. Red and blue curves represent up- and down-spin Fermi surfaces, respectively. (b) TMR due to the Néel spin current on two magnetic sublattices along a high-symmetry direction of the AFM electrode, representing RuO2 (001).

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    (a), (b) Atomic and magnetic structure of RuO2 (001) (a) and CrO2 (001) (b). (c), (d) Fermi surfaces for up spin (left) and down spin (right) of RuO2 (c) and for up spin of CrO2 (d) with essential bands numbered. (e), (f) Supercells of RuO2 (110) (e) and CrO2 (110) (f). (g) Distribution of conduction channels in the 2DBZ for up spin (left) and down spin (right) of RuO2 (110). High-symmetry points in the 2DBZ are indicated and essential contributing bands numbered. (h) Spin polarization of conduction channels in RuO2 (110). (i) Same as (g) for up spin of CrO2 (110).

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    (a) Atomic structure of RuO2/TiO2/CrO2 (110) MTJ. (b) Calculated layer-resolved density of states (DOS) for the MTJ shown in (a). The horizontal line indicates the Fermi energy. (c) Calculated k-resolved transmission in the 2DBZ for P- (left) and AP (right) states of the MTJ. (d), (e) Calculated total transmissions, TP and TAP, for P and AP states of the MTJ (d) and TMR (e) as functions of energy.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4

    (a) Atomic structure of RuO2/TiO2/[CrO2/TiO2] (001) MTJ. (b), (c) Calculated transmission, TP and TAP, for magnetic moments of Cr atoms parallel and antiparallel to RuA atoms (b) and TMR (c) as functions of energy for the MTJ shown in (a).

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×