Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

YBa2Cu3O7/La0.7Ca0.3MnO3 bilayers: Interface coupling and electric transport properties

R. Werner, C. Raisch, A. Ruosi, B. A. Davidson, P. Nagel, M. Merz, S. Schuppler, M. Glaser, J. Fujii, T. Chassé, R. Kleiner, and D. Koelle
Phys. Rev. B 82, 224509 – Published 10 December 2010

Abstract

Heteroepitaxially grown bilayers of ferromagnetic La0.7Ca0.3MnO3 (LCMO) on top of superconducting YBa2Cu3O7 (YBCO) thin films were investigated by focusing on electric transport properties as well as on magnetism and orbital occupation at the interface. Transport measurements on YBCO single layers and on YBCO/LCMO bilayers, with different YBCO thickness dY and constant LCMO thickness dL=50nm, show a significant reduction in the superconducting transition temperature Tc only for dY<10nm, with only a slightly stronger Tc suppression in the bilayers, as compared to the single layers. X-ray magnetic circular dichroism measurements confirm recently published data of an induced magnetic moment on the interfacial Cu by the ferromagnetically ordered Mn ions, with antiparallel alignment between Cu and Mn moments. However, we observe a significantly larger Cu moment than previously reported, indicating stronger coupling between Cu and Mn at the interface. This in turn could result in an interface with lower transparency, and hence smaller spin-diffusion length, that would explain our electric transport data, i.e., smaller Tc suppression. Moreover, linear dichroism measurements did not show any evidence for orbital reconstruction at the interface, indicating that a large change in orbital occupancies through hybridization is not necessary to induce a measurable ferromagnetic moment on the Cu atoms.

    • Received 10 September 2010

    DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.82.224509

    ©2010 The American Physical Society

    Authors & Affiliations

    R. Werner1, C. Raisch2, A. Ruosi3, B. A. Davidson4, P. Nagel5, M. Merz5, S. Schuppler5, M. Glaser2, J. Fujii4, T. Chassé2, R. Kleiner1, and D. Koelle1,*

    • 1Physikalisches Institut-Experimentalphysik II, Universität Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 14, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
    • 2Physikalische Chemie, Universität Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 18, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
    • 3Department of Physics, University of Naples Federico II, P.Tecchio 80, 80125 Naples, Italy
    • 4CNR-IOM, TASC National Laboratory, S.S. 14 Km 163.5 in AREA Science Park, 34012 Basovizza, Trieste, Italy
    • 5Institut für Festkörperphysik, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, D-76021 Karlsruhe, Germany

    • *koelle@uni-tuebingen.de

    Article Text (Subscription Required)

    Click to Expand

    References (Subscription Required)

    Click to Expand
    Issue

    Vol. 82, Iss. 22 — 1 December 2010

    Reuse & Permissions
    Access Options
    Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

    Authorization Required


    ×

    Images

    • Figure 1
      (Color online) (a) AFM images of LCMO film surface (dL=50nm) with an rms roughness of 0.2 nm and (b) YBCO film surface (dY=50nm) with an rms roughness of 0.8 nm. Numbers left and right from color bar refer to (a) and (b), respectively.Reuse & Permissions
    • Figure 2
      (Color online) XRD data for a single layer YBCO (dY=10nm) and LCMO (dL=50nm) film and for a YBCO/LCMO bilayer (dY=20nm and dL=50nm). The main graph shows Θ2Θ scans (for YBCO and YBCO/LCMO shifted vertically for clarity). The inset shows a comparison of rocking curves around the YBCO (005) and LCMO (002) peaks for the SLs and the BLs, with full width half maximum Δω=0.05° and 0.06° for LCMO in the SL and BL and 0.10° and 0.11° for YBCO in the SL and BL, respectively.Reuse & Permissions
    • Figure 3
      (Color online) Resistivity ρ vs temperature T of YBCO and LCMO single-layer films with thicknesses dY and dL, respectively.Reuse & Permissions
    • Figure 4
      (Color online) (a) Resistance R vs temperature T of YBCO/LCMO bilayers with dL=50nm thick LCMO and different YBCO thickness dY. (b) Superconducting transition temperature Tc vs YBCO thickness dY for YBCO single layers and for YBCO/LCMO bilayers obtained from the R(T) data shown in (a) and in Fig. 3.Reuse & Permissions
    • Figure 5
      (Color online) XMCD spectra at the MnL3 edge for different T from the YBCO/LCMO bilayer (dY=20nm and dL=5.2nm). The maximum dichroic signal is 29% at low T and decreases as T approaches TCurie. The inset shows the XMCD signal at the CuL edge with a maximum of 3.0% at T=46K, revealing antiferromagnetic coupling to the Mn magnetic moments. As the Cu XAS signal is one order of magnitude smaller than for Mn, and as Cu dichroism is another order of magnitude smaller, we had to average over many scans and do a careful smoothing of the data. Kinks in the signal arise from switching between different step sizes near the L3 and L2 edges.Reuse & Permissions
    • Figure 6
      (Color online) Evolution of magnetic moments with temperature for YBCO/LCMO bilayer. The comparison of XMCD signals (magnetic moments) at the Cu sites (open triangles) and the Mn sites (open squares) as well as bulk magnetization from SQUID measurements (black dots; field cooled in 10 mT) show the same behavior. The Cu dichroism signal is scaled by a factor of 10.Reuse & Permissions
    • Figure 7
      (Color online) Comparison of CuL edge XA spectra taken with in-plane and out-of-plane polarization. Shown are surface-sensitive TEY detection at (a) T=25K and (b) 200 K and (c) bulk-sensitive FY detection. Data in (a) was taken at ANKA; (b) and (c) at ELETTRA.Reuse & Permissions
    • Figure 8
      (Color online) XLD signal of the YBCO/LCMO bilayer at the MnL edge in TEY mode at T=25K. The inset shows the corresponding LD at the CuL edge.Reuse & Permissions
    ×

    Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

    Log In

    Cancel
    ×

    Search


    Article Lookup

    Paste a citation or DOI

    Enter a citation
    ×