Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Quasiparticle and optical spectroscopy of the organic semiconductors pentacene and PTCDA from first principles

Sahar Sharifzadeh, Ariel Biller, Leeor Kronik, and Jeffrey B. Neaton
Phys. Rev. B 85, 125307 – Published 16 March 2012
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

The broad use of organic semiconductors for optoelectronic applications relies on quantitative understanding and control of their spectroscopic properties. Of paramount importance are the transport gap—the difference between ionization potential and electron affinity—and the exciton binding energy—inferred from the difference between the transport and optical absorption gaps. Transport gaps are commonly established via photoemission and inverse photoemission spectroscopy (PES/IPES). However, PES and IPES are surface-sensitive, average over a dynamic lattice, and are subject to extrinsic effects, leading to significant uncertainty in gaps. Here, we use density functional theory and many-body perturbation theory to calculate the spectroscopic properties of two prototypical organic semiconductors, pentacene, and 3,4,9,10-perylene tetracarboxylic dianhydride (PTCDA), quantitatively comparing with measured PES, IPES, and optical absorption spectra. For bulk pentacene and PTCDA, the computed transport gaps are 2.4 and 3.0 eV, and optical gaps are 1.7 and 2.1 eV, respectively. Computed bulk quasiparticle spectra are in excellent agreement with surface-sensitive photoemission measurements over several eV only if the measured gap is reduced by 0.6 eV for pentacene and 0.6–0.9 eV for PTCDA. We attribute this redshift to several physical effects, including incomplete charge screening at the surface, static and dynamical disorder, and experimental resolution. Optical gaps are in excellent agreement with experiment with solid-state exciton binding energies of ∼0.5 eV for both systems; for pentacene the exciton is delocalized over several molecules and exhibits significant charge transfer character. Our parameter-free calculations provide new interpretation of spectroscopic properties of organic semiconductors critical to optoelectronics.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 15 October 2011

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.125307

©2012 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Sahar Sharifzadeh1,*, Ariel Biller2, Leeor Kronik2,†, and Jeffrey B. Neaton1,‡

  • 1Molecular Foundry, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
  • 2Department of Materials and Interfaces, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovoth, Israel

  • *ssharifzadeh@lbl.gov
  • leeor.kronik@weizmann.ac.il
  • jbneaton@lbl.gov

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 85, Iss. 12 — 15 March 2012

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1
    Pentacene and PTCDA molecule and bulk crystal.Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2
    The electronic component of the excited state wavefunction [Eq. (1)] for pentacene (red/left) and PTCDA (blue/right). The H, C, and O atoms are represented as white, gray and red spheres, respectively. The hole located in a location of high probability, less than 1 Å above a C atom in the molecular plane, as indicated by a green arrow. Insets show the same for the gas-phase molecule. For the crystal, an isosurface value which contains 30% of the charge density is taken; while for the isolated molecules, the isosurface value is taken to be 1% of the maximum.Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3
    Comparison of the GW broadened density of states (a3) and (b3) with (inverse) photoemission (PES/IPES) data extracted from Refs. 7 and 8 (a1) and 10 and 12 (b1) for pentacene and PTCDA, respectively. The spectra are aligned such that zero is at the center of the gap. For Ref. 8, because unoccupied states are unavailable, the spectrum is shifted so that the highest occupied peak lines up with Ref. 7. The calculated and experimental spectra agree very well when the photoemission gap is rigidly shifted by 0.6 eV for (a2) pentacene and 0.9 eV for (b2) PTCDA.Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4
    The electrostatic energy needed to charge a sphere within a linear dielectric. Note: the 3D system is projected onto a 2D picture, which is not depicted to scale.Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×