Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Rapid Communication

Nonstoichiometric doping and Bi antisite defect in single crystal Bi2Se3

F.-T. Huang, M.-W. Chu, H. H. Kung, W. L. Lee, R. Sankar, S.-C. Liou, K. K. Wu, Y. K. Kuo, and F. C. Chou
Phys. Rev. B 86, 081104(R) – Published 16 August 2012

Abstract

We studied the defects of Bi2Se3 generated from Bridgman growth of stoichiometric and nonstoichiometric self-fluxes. Growth habit, lattice size, and transport properties are strongly affected by the types of defects generated. Major defect types of the BiSe antisite and partial Bi2-layer intercalation are identified through combined studies of direct atomic-scale imaging with scanning transmission electron microscopy in conjunction with energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy, x-ray diffraction, and Hall effect measurements. We propose a consistent explanation to the origin of defect type, growth morphology, and transport property.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 8 June 2012

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.86.081104

©2012 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

F.-T. Huang1, M.-W. Chu1, H. H. Kung2, W. L. Lee2, R. Sankar1, S.-C. Liou1, K. K. Wu1,3, Y. K. Kuo3, and F. C. Chou1,4,5,*

  • 1Center for Condensed Matter Sciences, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
  • 2Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan
  • 3Department of Physics, National Dong Hwa University, Hualien 97401, Taiwan
  • 4National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center, Hsinchu 30076, Taiwan
  • 5Center for Emerging Material and Advanced Devices, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan

  • *fcchou@ntu.edu.tw

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 86, Iss. 8 — 15 August 2012

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1
    (a) The crystal structure of Bi2Se3 can be described with space group R3¯m, where the quintuple layer is the building block with Se2 (blue) in the middle and Se1 (green) near the van der Waals gap. The inset shows the BiSe6 octahedron and the Se1 (or BiSe1 antisite in dashed circle) environment. (b) Crystals grown using Bi:Se=2:3 and 2:(3+x) of stoichiometric and Se-rich fluxes, with a (001) plane index mostly perpendicular to the growth direction. (c) Crystals grown using Bi:Se=(2+x):3 of Bi-rich flux show a (001) plane index along the growth direction.Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2
    STEM-HAADF images of Bi2Se3. (a) A high resolution image shows that the quintuple of Bi2Se3 consists of two bright spots (Bi) and three fainter spots (Se). (b) For the Bi-rich flux growth, a high density of Bi can be found in the grain boundary, as shown by the thick and bright lines at low magnification. (c) A low density of Bi2-layer intercalated patches can always be found in the van der Waals gap for the as-grown crystals, whether using Bi- or Se-rich flux. The intercalated Bi2-layer patches would deform the quintuple layer locally by opening up the van der Waals gap. (d) A large area of perfectly ordered quintuple layers without intercalated Bi2-layer patch induced deformation can be found in samples after 300 C annealing.Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3
    Lattice parameters vs lattice volume of all crystals studied, where c axes are shown as empty circles and a axes are shown as empty squares. All studied samples are clustered in groups of Bi-rich flux growth before annealing (Bi-rich), Se-rich flux growth before annealing (Se-rich), and Se-rich plus post annealing at 300–600 C (Se-rich+300–600 C), in an increasing trend, as indicated by the connected experimental data points. A list of Bi2Se3 lattice parameters reported in the literature since 1960 are shown as various solid symbols (Ref. 8).Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4
    Drude mobility (μ) vs carrier concentration (n) for all samples studied are shown; all are n type. Crystals grown from Bi-rich flux (Bi-rich) have the highest carrier concentration but the lowest mobility, and 300 C postannealing (Bi-rich+300 C) reduces the carrier concentrations to the same level of 15×1018. Crystals from stoichiometric and Se-rich flux growth (Se-rich) have the lowest carrier concentration and highest mobility, and the 300 C postannealing (Se3.10+300 C) shows no significant impact on modifying the carrier concentration and mobility.Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 5
    Figure 5
    (a) STEM-HAADF image of a bulk region with thickness 25 nm along the incident beam direction. The Se1 column pointed out by the white arrow shows an anomalously enhanced imaging contrast. Further STEM-EDX chemical mappings of the corresponding boxed region are enlarged in the right panels (cyan, Bi map; yellow, Se map). The gray (white) circles in the mapping represent the Bi (Se) columns. The enhanced contrasts of the Se1 columns (signified by the red Se1 text) are shown to be correlated with the presence of Bi on the sites, i.e., the formation of BiSe antisite defects. (b) The enhanced Se1 contrasts are more regularly observed at the edge of the same specimen, as indicated by the white arrows, with a corresponding enhanced blowup of the white boxed region in the inset in the lower left corner.Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×