Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Tuning structures and electronic spectra of graphene layers with tilt grain boundaries

Long-Jing Yin, Jia-Bin Qiao, Wen-Xiao Wang, Zhao-Dong Chu, Kai Fen Zhang, Rui-Fen Dou, Chun Lei Gao, Jin-Feng Jia, Jia-Cai Nie, and Lin He
Phys. Rev. B 89, 205410 – Published 8 May 2014
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

Despite the fact that structures and properties of tilt grain boundaries of graphite surface and graphene have been extensively studied, their effect on the structures and electronic spectra of graphene layers has not been fully addressed. Here we study effects of one-dimensional tilt grain boundaries on structures and electronic spectra of graphene multilayers by scanning tunneling microscopy and spectroscopy. A tilt grain boundary of a top graphene sheet in graphene multilayers leads to a twist between consecutive layers and generates superstructures (Moiré patterns) on one side of the boundary. Our results demonstrate that the twisting changes the electronic spectra of Bernal graphene bilayer and graphene trilayers dramatically. We also study quantum-confined twisted graphene bilayer generated between two adjacent tilt grain boundaries and find that the band structure of such a system is still valid even when the number of superstructures is reduced to two in one direction. It implies that the electronic structure of this system is driven by the physics of a single Moiré spot.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 9 December 2013
  • Revised 25 April 2014

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.89.205410

©2014 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Long-Jing Yin1,*, Jia-Bin Qiao1,*, Wen-Xiao Wang1, Zhao-Dong Chu1, Kai Fen Zhang2, Rui-Fen Dou1,†, Chun Lei Gao2, Jin-Feng Jia2, Jia-Cai Nie1, and Lin He1,†

  • 1Department of Physics, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, People's Republic of China
  • 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, Key Laboratory of Artificial Structures and Quantum Control (Ministry of Education), Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, People's Republic of China

  • *These authors contributed equally to this paper.
  • Corresponding authors: helin@bnu.edu.cn, rfdou@bnu.edu.cn

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 89, Iss. 20 — 15 May 2014

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    (a) Schematic structure of a unique graphene bilayer, in which one side of the grain boundary is Bernal graphene bilayer and the opposite side is twisted graphene bilayer with a period of Moiré pattern D. The period of superstructures PB along the boundaries depends on the twisted angle θ and α, the orientation of the boundary in respect to the graphene lattice. In panel (a), α=30±θ/2, PB=D. (b)–(e) STM images of graphene layers on graphite surface. Moiré pattern with different periods appears on one side of the tilt grain boundary. All the grain boundaries show 1D superlattices with PBD. (b) D=4.7 nm, θ=3.0; (c) D=7.2 nm, θ=2.0; (d) D=17.0 nm, θ=0.83; (e) D=28.2 nm, θ=0.50.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    (a) Value of PB as a function of 1/θ. The solid red circles are the average experimentally measured values obtained from several tens of samples. The black dashed line is plotted according PB=a/θ. (b) The ΔEVHS as a function of θ. The red solid circles are the average experimentally measured values obtained in twisted graphene bilayer on graphite surface. The black solid squares are the experimental results taken from the CVD-grown graphene sheet deposited on graphite, as reported in Ref. [25]. The dashed line is a guide to the eyes.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    (a) STM image of graphene layers on graphite surface with two sets of superlattices showing a region of higher contrast (left) and a region of lower contrast (right). The left tilt grain boundary is on the top graphene layer; the right one is on the second layer. (b) Zoom-in topography of the white frame in (a). The white line shows no atomic mismatch between the two regions of superlattice, indicating that the surface graphene layer is continuous for both regions. The inset shows Fourier transforms of panel (b). (c) Zoom-in topography of the black frame in (a) with atomic resolution. The blue and red lines give one direction of the atomic lattice of graphene grains connected by the left tilt boundary. The angle between these directions is measured to be 2.2. (d), (e) Schematic pictures of the structure in panel (a). (f)–(i) dI/dV-V curves measured on different positions of panel (a). The spectra have been vertically offset for clarity.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4

    (a) Dispersion of low-energy states for θ=2.2, tθ=156 meV, in a twisted graphene bilayer. Two saddle points form at ky=0 between the two Dirac cones. (b) Electronic spectra of low-energy states for θ=2.2, tθ=156 meV, in a twisted graphene trilayer (the top layer and the second layer is AB stacking and there is a stacking fault with θ2.2 between the third layer and the second layer). (c) A section view of the band structures with kx=0 in panel (a) (solid curve) and (b) (dashed curve). (d) DOS of the bilayer in panel (a) (solid curve) and the trilayer in panel (b) (dashed curve) with two VHSs. Both are calculated numerically according to the well-known formula S4π21kEkdk.

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×