Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

On the possibility to detect multipolar order in URu2Si2 by the electric quadrupolar transition of resonant elastic x-ray scattering

Y. L. Wang, G. Fabbris, D. Meyers, N. H. Sung, R. E. Baumbach, E. D. Bauer, P. J. Ryan, J.-W. Kim, X. Liu, M. P. M. Dean, G. Kotliar, and X. Dai
Phys. Rev. B 96, 085146 – Published 30 August 2017

Abstract

Resonant elastic x-ray scattering is a powerful technique for measuring multipolar order parameters. In this paper, we theoretically and experimentally study the possibility of using this technique to detect the proposed multipolar order parameters in URu2Si2 at the U-L3 edge with the electric quadrupolar transition. Based on an atomic model, we calculate the azimuthal dependence of the quadrupolar transition at the U-L3 edge. The results illustrate the potential of this technique for distinguishing different multipolar order parameters. We then perform experiments on ultraclean single crystals of URu2Si2 at the U-L3 edge to search for the predicted signal, but do not detect any indications of multipolar moments within the experimental uncertainty. We theoretically estimate the orders of magnitude of the cross section and the expected count rate of the quadrupolar transition and compare them to the dipolar transitions at the U-M4 and U-L3 edges, clarifying the difficulty in detecting higher order multipolar order parameters in URu2Si2 in the current experimental setup.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 26 May 2017

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.085146

©2017 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Y. L. Wang1, G. Fabbris1, D. Meyers1, N. H. Sung2, R. E. Baumbach2,3, E. D. Bauer2, P. J. Ryan4,5, J.-W. Kim4, X. Liu6, M. P. M. Dean1, G. Kotliar1,7, and X. Dai6

  • 1Department of Condensed Matter Physics and Materials Science, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
  • 2Materials Physics and Applications Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
  • 3Condensed Matter Group, National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32310, USA
  • 4Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA
  • 5School of Physical Sciences, Dublin City University, Dublin 9, Ireland
  • 6Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics and Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
  • 7Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08856, USA

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 96, Iss. 8 — 15 August 2017

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    (a) The crystal structure of URu2Si2. We assume a type-I antiferromultipolar order on uranium sites. (b) Illustration of experimental setup. A beam of polarized x rays k is incident on the [001] sample face with an angle θ and scattered by electrons, and then the scattered x rays k with outgoing angle θ and specific polarization is analyzed. φ is the azimuthal angle. For linear polarization, π (σ) polarization is parallel (normal) to the scattering plane.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    The calculated azimuthal dependence of a (0,0,3) reflection of the L3E2 transition in both σπ and σσ channels for different proposals of multipolar OPs. The incident photon energy is 17.167 keV and the azimuthal angle is defined with respect to the [100] direction. For each proposal, the intensity is normalized by the maximum intensity of its σπ channel. (a),(b) A2+ hexadecapole Hzα; (c),(d) A2 dipole Jz and ocutpole Tzα; (e),(f) B1+ quadrupole O22 and hexadecapole O42; (g),(h) B1 octupole Txyz; (i),(j) B2+ quadrupole Oxy and hexadecapole Hzβ; (k),(l) B2 octupole Tzβ.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    (a) X-ray diffraction L dependence measured along the (0,0,L) direction using 17.215 keV and φ=1.2. (b) Energy dependence of (0,0,13) and (0,0,15) Bragg peaks together with the U-L3 edge XANES. (c) Temperature dependence of (0,0,15) Bragg peak.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4

    (0,0,3) REXS intensity as a function of incident photon energy and polarization. The incoming light is linearly polarized and the polarization of the outgoing light is not analyzed. We compare the results of the M4E1 transition with the L3E2 transition and the L3(E1+E2) transition. We consider different ordering schemes: (a)–(c) Antiferrodipole Jz and antiferro-octupole Tzα at φ=0. (d)–(f) Antiferroquadrupole Oxy and antiferrohexadecapole Hzβ at φ=0. (g)–(i) Antiferroquadrupole Oxy and antiferrohexadecapole Hzβ at φ=π4. (j) Antiferro-octupole Tzβ at φ=0. (k) Antiferrohexadecapole Hzα at φ=0. (l) Antiferrohexadecapole Hzα at φ=π/8.

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×