Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Magnetic excitations of the Cu2+ quantum spin chain in Sr3CuPtO6

J. C. Leiner, Joosung Oh, A. I. Kolesnikov, M. B. Stone, Manh Duc Le, E. P. Kenny, B. J. Powell, M. Mourigal, E. E. Gordon, M.-H. Whangbo, J.-W. Kim, S.-W. Cheong, and Je-Geun Park
Phys. Rev. B 97, 104426 – Published 30 March 2018

Abstract

We report the magnetic excitation spectrum as measured by inelastic neutron scattering for a polycrystalline sample of Sr3CuPtO6. Modeling the data by the 2+4 spinon contributions to the dynamical susceptibility within the chains, and with interchain coupling treated in the random phase approximation, accounts for the major features of the powder-averaged structure factor. The magnetic excitations broaden considerably as temperature is raised, persisting up to above 100 K and displaying a broad transition as previously seen in the susceptibility data. No spin gap is observed in the dispersive spin excitations at low momentum transfer, which is consistent with the gapless spinon continuum expected from the coordinate Bethe ansatz. However, the temperature dependence of the excitation spectrum gives evidence of some very weak interchain coupling.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 12 September 2017
  • Revised 11 December 2017

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.97.104426

©2018 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Authors & Affiliations

J. C. Leiner1,2,*, Joosung Oh1,2, A. I. Kolesnikov3, M. B. Stone3, Manh Duc Le4, E. P. Kenny5, B. J. Powell5, M. Mourigal6, E. E. Gordon7, M.-H. Whangbo7, J.-W. Kim8, S.-W. Cheong8, and Je-Geun Park1,2,†

  • 1Center for Correlated Electron Systems, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Seoul 08826, Korea
  • 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
  • 3Neutron Scattering Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
  • 4ISIS Facility, STFC, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Didcot, Oxfordshire OX11-0QX, United Kingdom
  • 5School of Mathematics and Physics, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
  • 6School of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, USA
  • 7Department of Chemistry, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-8204, USA
  • 8Rutgers Center for Emergent Materials and Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA

  • *jleiner@snu.ac.kr
  • jgpark10@snu.ac.kr

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 97, Iss. 10 — 1 March 2018

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Crystal structure of Sr3CuPtO6, with the spin chains consisting of face-sharing CuO6 trigonal prisms and PtO6 octahedra running along the chain direction. When viewed along the chain direction, the chains form a triangular lattice. In each CuO6 trigonal prism, the Cu2+ ion is close to one “square” face of the prism to achieve a “square-planar” coordination environment.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Magnetic susceptibility data for single crystals of Sr3CuPtO6 with an applied magnetic field of μ0H=2kOe applied in the labeled orientations relative to the spin chains. The data were collected after zero field cooling. The chain structure shown may be compared with Fig. 1.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    Temperature dependence of the magnetic excitations in Sr3CuPtO6 (measured with Ei=22meV). (a)–(d) Evolution of Q-E scattering intensity at the indicated temperatures with the empty sample-holder background subtracted. (e)–(h) The indicated temperature differences for comparison. (The faint parabolic line is from Helium recoil scattering). (i)–(l) 1D dispersion data extracted from the powder data in (a)–(d) using the conversion method of Tomiyasu et al. [22].

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4

    INS for SCPO taken with Ei= 8 meV. (a) Data collected at 1.7 K with the empty-can background subtracted. (b) Difference between the 1.7 K and 50 K data. No gap in the magnetic excitation spectrum at the zone center is observed.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 5
    Figure 5

    (a) The T=0 dynamical structure factor calculated by treating the interchain coupling at the RPA level with the single chain susceptibility derived from 2+4 spinon structure factor from Caux and Hagemans [32] and the parameters given in Table 1. The form factor of the Cu2+ ion has been taken into account. (b) 1D powder average of this spinon structure factor. (c) Comparison of the data at 1.7 K and theory using a constant energy cut at E=5meV [horizonal line in (b)](integrated between 4.85.2meV) and E=7.5meV (integrated between 7.37.7meV). The solid red lines are derived from theory described in the text with J/J=150. (d) The difference between the ideal 1D spinon structure factor and the 3D random phase approximation (RPA) treatment of that theory with an interchain coupling ratio of J/J=150. (e) Difference in the powder averages of the aforementioned structure factors. (f) Comparison of data (at indicated temperatures) and theory using cuts at momentum transfer of Q=0.88Å1 (integrated between 0.85 0.91 Å1), shown by the straight vertical lines in (a) and (b). The four solid curves are derived from theory with the different J/J ratios indicated.

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×