Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
  • Rapid Communication

Coherence of a dynamically decoupled quantum-dot hole spin

L. Huthmacher, R. Stockill, E. Clarke, M. Hugues, C. Le Gall, and M. Atatüre
Phys. Rev. B 97, 241413(R) – Published 28 June 2018
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

A heavy hole confined to an InGaAs quantum dot promises the union of a stable spin and optical coherence to form a near perfect, high-bandwidth spin-photon interface. Despite theoretical predictions and encouraging preliminary measurements, the dynamic processes determining the coherence of the hole spin are yet to be understood. Here, we establish the regimes that allow for a highly coherent hole spin in these systems, recovering a crossover from hyperfine to electrical-noise dominated decoherence with a few-Tesla external magnetic field. Dynamic decoupling allows us to reach the longest ground-state coherence time, T2, of 4.0±0.2μs, observed in this system. The improvement of coherence we measure is quantitatively supported by an independent analysis of the local electrical environment.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 24 November 2017
  • Revised 16 February 2018

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.97.241413

©2018 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied PhysicsQuantum Information, Science & TechnologyAtomic, Molecular & Optical

Authors & Affiliations

L. Huthmacher1, R. Stockill1, E. Clarke2, M. Hugues3, C. Le Gall1, and M. Atatüre1,*

  • 1Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0HE, United Kingdom
  • 2EPSRC National Centre for III-V Technologies, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 3JD, United Kingdom
  • 3Université Côte d'Azur, CNRS, CRHEA, Valbonne, France

  • *ma424@cam.ac.uk

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 97, Iss. 24 — 15 June 2018

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Measurement of magnetic-field-dependent inhomogeneous dephasing time, T2*. (a) Sample geometry featuring the optical axis (orange arrow) and the magnetic field (black arrow). (b) Energy-level diagram of the positively charged QD. (c) Schematic of the Ramsey pulse sequence. (d) Visibility of Ramsey fringes measured at external magnetic fields Bxext of 2T (orange), 4T (purple), and 6.5T (light blue). Error bars represent ±1 standard deviation. Solid curves are fits to the data to extract T2*. (e) Summary of magnetic-field-dependent measurement of T2*; data points from panels (d) are presented in the corresponding color and error bars represent ±1 standard deviation. Gray dotted curve shows decay 1/Bext for Bxext>4T.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Hahn-echo measurement for different values of Bxext. (a) Visibility of the Hahn-echo signal for Bxext of 1 T (orange), 3 T (purple), 5 T (light blue), and 8 T (green). The data have been normalized to account for pulse imperfections. Error bars represent ±1 standard deviation. Solid curves are fits to extract T2HE; for Bxext=1T the solid curve only serves as guide to the eye. The inset shows a schematic of the Hahn-echo pulse sequence. (b),(c) Zoom-in for the 1 and 2 T data, revealing a sharp drop and revival of coherence within the first 300 ns. (d) Full behavior of T2HE with respect to Bxext; values are extracted from the fits for Bxext3T and error bars represent ±1 standard deviation. For Bxext2T we show the time where the visibility falls below 1/e for the first time.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    Normalized autocorrelation function of the neutral exciton intensity fluctuations. (a) Extracted autocorrelation function of intensity fluctuations measured on the neutral exciton transition (solid blue circles) at low resonant excitation power (the excited state population was 1/20). The orange curve represents a fit to the data containing four exponential functions as well as a 1/Δt1λ component. The gray curve represents only the contribution of the exponential functions. The inset is an illustration of how electrical noise leads to intensity fluctuations, responsible for the bunching of the autocorrelation function. (b) Residuals of the two curves presented in (a), highlighting the strong deviation of the gray curve from the data for Δt<1ms.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4

    Dynamic decoupling of the hole spin. (a) Visibility for dynamic decoupling at Bxext=5T as a function of the number of π pulses, where Nπ is 1 (orange), 3 (purple), 5 (light blue), and 9 (green). The inset shows a schematic of the employed pulse sequence. Solid curves represent fits to the data to extract the coherence time and error bars are given by ±1 standard deviation. The data was normalized for the fits to intercept a visibility of 1 at zero delay, factoring out the reduced visibility due to finite pulse fidelity. (b) Scaling of the coherence time with the number of π pulses; data presented in (a) shown in matching color. Gray curve presents a fit of T2HE(Nπ)γ to the data, extracted scaling γ=0.325±0.005. Error bars represent ±1 standard deviation.

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×