Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Tuning the S=1/2 square-lattice antiferromagnet Sr2Cu(Te1xWx)O6 from Néel order to quantum disorder to columnar order

O. Mustonen, S. Vasala, K. P. Schmidt, E. Sadrollahi, H. C. Walker, I. Terasaki, F. J. Litterst, E. Baggio-Saitovitch, and M. Karppinen
Phys. Rev. B 98, 064411 – Published 13 August 2018
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

The spin-1/2 square-lattice Heisenberg model is predicted to have a quantum disordered ground state when magnetic frustration is maximized by competing nearest-neighbor J1 and next-nearest-neighbor J2 interactions (J2/J10.5). The double perovskites Sr2CuTeO6 and Sr2CuWO6 are isostructural spin-1/2 square-lattice antiferromagnets with Néel (J1 dominates) and columnar (J2 dominates) magnetic order, respectively. Here we characterize the full isostructural solid-solution series Sr2Cu(Te1xWx)O6(0x1) tunable from Néel order to quantum disorder to columnar order. A spin-liquid-like ground state was previously observed for the x=0.5 phase, but we show that the magnetic order is suppressed below 1.5 K in a much wider region of x0.10.6. This coincides with significant T-linear terms in the low-temperature specific heat. However, density-functional theory calculations predict most of the materials are not in the highly frustrated J2/J10.5 region square-lattice Heisenberg model. Thus, a combination of both magnetic frustration and quenched disorder is the likely origin of the spin-liquid-like state in x=0.5.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 17 April 2018
  • Revised 24 July 2018

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.064411

©2018 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Authors & Affiliations

O. Mustonen1, S. Vasala2, K. P. Schmidt3, E. Sadrollahi3, H. C. Walker4, I. Terasaki5, F. J. Litterst2,3, E. Baggio-Saitovitch2, and M. Karppinen1,*

  • 1Department of Chemistry and Materials Science, Aalto University, FI-00076 Espoo, Finland
  • 2Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas (CBPF), Rua Dr Xavier Sigaud 150, Urca, Rio de Janeiro, 22290-180, Brazil
  • 3Institut für Physik der Kondensierten Materie, Technische Universität Braunschweig, 38110 Braunschweig, Germany
  • 4ISIS Neutron and Muon Source, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, OX11 0QX, United Kingdom
  • 5Department of Physics, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8602, Japan

  • *Corresponding author: maarit.karppinen@aalto.fi

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 98, Iss. 6 — 1 August 2018

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    (a) Phase diagram of the spin-1/2 square-lattice Heisenberg model as a function of J2/J1, where J1 is the nearest neighbor and J2 is the next-nearest-neighbor interaction [13, 18, 51]. Known compounds realizing the model are placed at their respective positions. The classical ground states of the model are ferromagnetic order, Néel antiferromagnetic (NAF) order, and columnar antiferromagnetic (CAF) order. A quantum spin-liquid state has been predicted for J2/J10.40.6 at the NAF-CAF boundary. Isostructural double perovskites Sr2CuTeO6 and Sr2CuWO6 are in the NAF and CAF regions, respectively. (b) The B-site ordered double-perovskite structure of Sr2CuTeO6 and Sr2CuWO6 [24, 25]. (c) The square of S=1/2Cu2+ cations in the ab plane of Sr2CuTeO6 and Sr2CuWO6 with the view down the c axis. The Te/W cation in the center of the Cu2+ square determines whether J1 or J2 interaction dominates.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    (a) Magnetic susceptibility of selected samples as a function of temperature. Zero-field cooled and field-cooled data overlap and only the former is shown. (b) The position Tmax and height χmax of the broad maximum in magnetic susceptibility as a function of x in Sr2Cu(Te1xWx)O6.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    (a) Reduced specific heat of selected samples as a function of temperature. (b) Low-temperature Cp/TT2 plot showing the T-linear relationship of most samples as indicated by a non-zero y-intercept. (c) T-linear term γ of specific heat as a function of x in Sr2Cu(Te1xWx)O6.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4

    Zero-field spectra of Sr2Cu(Te1xWx)O6 with (a) x=0.9 and (b) x=0.8 showing spontaneous rotation signals in the magnetically ordered state. (c) Zero-field spectra of x=0.7 at 5.5 and 1.5 K revealing only weak rotation signals and considerable dynamic damping. (d) Comparison of the temperature-dependent local fields Bi for x=0.9 and x=1 (data from Ref. [21]). Drawn lines are interpolations using a standard approximation as described in the main text. (e) Temperature dependence of ratio between paramagnetic and total asymmetries measured in a weak transverse field of 5 mT for x=0.7, 0.8, 0.9. (f) Zero-field spectra for x=0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6 at 1.5–1.8 K showing no indication of magnetic ordering or static magnetism.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 5
    Figure 5

    Energy difference between Néel and columnar antiferromagnetic order as a function of composition in Sr2Cu(Te1xWx)O6 calculated using GGA+U.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 6
    Figure 6

    Schematic phase diagram of Sr2Cu(Te1xWx)O6. The black squares represent measured Néel temperatures and the blue circles represent the lowest temperature measured for samples that remain entirely dynamic and do not order.

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×