Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Ising versus Potts criticality in low-temperature magnetothermodynamics of a frustrated spin-12 Heisenberg triangular bilayer

Jozef Strečka, Katarína Karľová, Vasyl Baliha, and Oleg Derzhko
Phys. Rev. B 98, 174426 – Published 21 November 2018

Abstract

Low-temperature magnetization curves and thermodynamics of a frustrated spin-12 Heisenberg triangular bilayer with the antiferromagnetic intradimer interaction and either ferromagnetic or antiferromagnetic interdimer interaction are investigated in a highly frustrated parameter region, where localized many-magnon eigenstates provide the most dominant contribution to magnetothermodynamics. Low-energy states of the highly frustrated spin-12 Heisenberg triangular bilayer can be accordingly found from a mapping correspondence with an effective triangular-lattice spin-12 Ising model in a field. A description based on the effective Ising model implies that the frustrated Heisenberg triangular bilayer with the ferromagnetic interdimer coupling displays in a zero-temperature magnetization curve discontinuous magnetization jump, which is reduced upon increasing of temperature until a continuous field-driven phase transition from the Ising universality class is reached at a certain critical temperature. The frustrated Heisenberg triangular bilayer with the antiferromagnetic interdimer coupling contrarily exhibits multistep magnetization curve with intermediate plateaus at 13 and 23 of the saturation magnetization, whereas discontinuous magnetization jumps observable at zero temperature change to continuous field-driven phase transitions from the universality class of three-state Potts model at sufficiently low temperatures. Exact results and Monte Carlo simulations of the effective Ising model are confronted with full exact diagonalization data for the Heisenberg triangular bilayer in order to corroborate these findings.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
7 More
  • Received 20 July 2018
  • Revised 24 September 2018

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.174426

©2018 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Jozef Strečka1,*, Katarína Karľová1, Vasyl Baliha2, and Oleg Derzhko2,3

  • 1Institute of Physics, Faculty of Science, P. J. Šafárik University, Park Angelinum 9, 04001 Košice, Slovakia
  • 2Institute for Condensed Matter Physics, NASU, Svientsitskii Street 1, 79011 L'viv, Ukraine
  • 3Department for Theoretical Physics, Ivan Franko National University of L'viv, Drahomanov Street 12, 79005 L'viv, Ukraine

  • *jozef.strecka@upjs.sk

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 98, Iss. 17 — 1 November 2018

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Left: a small segment from the triangular bilayer. Thick (green) lines represent the intradimer coupling J2, while thin (blue) lines correspond to the interdimer coupling J1 within individual triangular layers. The interdimer couplings J1 between the next-nearest-neighbor spins from different layers are not drawn for clarity. Right: a schematic illustration of all interaction terms of two neighboring spin dimers forming an elementary square plaquette.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    One-magnon bands of the spin-12 Heisenberg triangular bilayer by considering zero magnetic field and (a) ferromagnetic interdimer interaction J1<0 and the relative ratio J2/|J1|=6; (b) antiferromagnetic interdimer interaction J1>0 and the relative ratio J2/J1=3. A projection of the dispersive band (12) into kakb plane is also shown as a contour plot, while the interaction ratio was chosen for two particular values when the flat band (11) touches the lowest energy of the dispersive band (12).

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    The isothermal magnetization curves of the spin-12 Heisenberg triangular bilayer with the linear size L for the particular case J2/|J1|=6 and a few different temperatures. (a) Full ED data for the Heisenberg bilayer with L=3 (open symbols) are compared with the exact results for the effective Ising model (solid lines); (b) MC simulations for the effective Ising model with L=180. Open symbols display the magnetization at a critical field as obtained from the exact result (19) of the corresponding Ising model at zero effective field.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4

    The isothermal field dependence of the susceptibility of the spin-12 Heisenberg triangular bilayer with the linear size L for the particular case J2/|J1|=6 and a few different temperatures. (a) Full ED data for the Heisenberg bilayer with L=3 (open symbols) are compared with the exact results for the effective Ising model (solid lines); (b) MC simulations for the effective Ising model with L=180. The inset shows the susceptibility at the lowest temperature kBT/|J1|=0.5 in an enhanced scale.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 5
    Figure 5

    The isothermal field dependence of the specific heat of the spin-12 Heisenberg triangular bilayer with the linear size L for the particular case J2/|J1|=6 and a few different temperatures. (a) Full ED data for the Heisenberg bilayer with L=3 (open symbols) are compared with the exact results for the effective Ising model (solid lines); (b) MC simulations for the effective Ising model with L=180. The inset shows the specific heat at the lowest temperature kBT/|J1|=0.5 in an enhanced scale.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 6
    Figure 6

    The isothermal magnetization curves of the spin-12 Heisenberg triangular bilayer with the linear size L for the particular case J2/J1=3 and a few different temperatures. (a) Full ED data for the Heisenberg bilayer with L=3 (open symbols) are compared with the exact results for the effective Ising model (solid lines); (b) MC simulations of the effective Ising model with L=180. Open circles denote critical points.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 7
    Figure 7

    A comparison of the isothermal magnetization curves of the spin-12 Heisenberg triangular bilayer with J2/J1=3 as obtained from full ED calculations for L=3 and MC simulations of the effective Ising model for L=180 at two different temperatures: (a) kBT/J1=0.1; (b) kBT/J1=0.2.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 8
    Figure 8

    The isothermal field dependence of the susceptibility data of the spin-12 Heisenberg triangular bilayer for the particular case J2/J1=3 and a few different temperatures. (a) Full ED data for the Heisenberg bilayer with L=3 (open symbols) are compared with the exact results for the effective Ising model (solid lines); (b) MC simulations of the effective Ising triangular lattice with L=180.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 9
    Figure 9

    The isothermal field dependence of the specific heat of the spin-12 Heisenberg triangular bilayer for the particular case J2/J1=3 and a few different temperatures. (a) Full ED data for the Heisenberg bilayer with L=3 (open symbols) are compared with the exact results for the effective Ising model (solid lines); (b) MC simulations of the effective Ising triangular lattice with L=180.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 10
    Figure 10

    A comparison of the specific heat of the spin-12 Heisenberg triangular bilayer with J2/J1=3 as obtained from full ED calculations for L=3 and MC simulations of the effective Ising model for L=180 at two different temperatures: (a) kBT/J1=0.1; (b) kBT/J1=0.2.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 11
    Figure 11

    The global phase diagram of the frustrated spin-12 Heisenberg triangular bilayer in the field-temperature plane as obtained from the exact analytical results for the effective spin-12 Ising model on a triangular lattice with the ferromagnetic interaction J1<0 [Fig. 11] and the phenomenological scaling adapted from Ref. [47] for the effective spin-12 Ising model on a triangular lattice with antiferromagnetic interaction J1>0 [Fig. 11]. A broken line in Fig. 11 allocates discontinuous field-driven phase transitions terminating at a critical point from the Ising universality class, while solid lines in Fig. 11 allocate continuous field-driven phase transitions approaching at sufficiently low temperatures critical boundaries (dotted lines) of a hard-hexagon model on a triangular lattice with the universality class of three-state Potts model. Two domes correspond to intermediate 13 and 23 magnetization plateaus with a regular alternation of “singlet-singlet-triplet” (s-s-t) and “singlet-triplet-triplet” (s-t-t) dimer states, respectively.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 12
    Figure 12

    The basis vectors a=a0(1,0) and b=a0(12,32) of one triangular layer (a0=1 is the triangular side length) used for a calculation of the one-magnon energy spectra presented in Appendix pp1.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 13
    Figure 13

    A schematic illustration of the effective 3×3 triangular Ising model under the periodic boundary conditions.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 14
    Figure 14

    A schematic illustration of the induced subgraphs, which correspond to all possible spin configurations of the effective 3×3 triangular Ising model.

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×