Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
  • Rapid Communication

Magnetic dichroism in the Kondo insulator SmB6

W. T. Fuhrman, J. C. Leiner, J. W. Freeland, M. van Veenendaal, S. M. Koohpayeh, W. Adam Phelan, T. M. McQueen, and C. Broholm
Phys. Rev. B 99, 020401(R) – Published 9 January 2019

Abstract

Samarium hexaboride (SmB6) is a purported topological Kondo insulator, with theory predicting that the experimentally observed metallic surface states manifest from a topologically nontrivial insulating bulk band structure. The insulating bulk itself is driven by strong correlations, and both bulk and surface are known to host compelling magnetic and electronic phenomena. We employed x-ray absorption spectroscopy and x-ray magnetic circular dichroism at the Sm M4,5 edges to probe the surface and bulk magnetic properties of Sm2+ and Sm3+ within SmB6. We observed an unexpected antialignment to the applied field of the Sm3+ magnetic dipole moment below T=75 K and of the total orbital moment of samarium below 30 K. The total bulk magnetization at 2 K is, however, positive and driven by Sm2+ Van Vleck susceptibility as well as 1% paramagnetic impurities with μeff=5.2(1)μB. This indicates the diamagneticlike Sm3+ magnetism is only a portion of the net magnetization, partially offsetting the response of paramagnetic impurities known within the bulk.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 15 April 2018

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.020401

©2019 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Authors & Affiliations

W. T. Fuhrman1,2,*, J. C. Leiner3,4,5, J. W. Freeland6,†, M. van Veenendaal7,6, S. M. Koohpayeh2, W. Adam Phelan2,8, T. M. McQueen2,8,9, and C. Broholm2,9,10

  • 1Center for Nanophysics and Advanced Materials, Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA
  • 2Institute for Quantum Matter and Department of Physics and Astronomy, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA
  • 3Center for Correlated Electron Systems, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Seoul 08826, Korea
  • 4Department of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
  • 5Neutron Scattering Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
  • 6Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA
  • 7Department of Physics, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois 60115, USA
  • 8Department of Chemistry, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA
  • 9Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA
  • 10NIST Center for Neutron Research, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA

  • *wfuhrman@schmidtsciencefellows.org
  • freeland@anl.gov

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 99, Iss. 2 — 1 January 2019

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    XAS and XMCD spectra at T=8 K, μ0H=5 T. Data were normalized by scaling the maximum at the M5 edge (1079 eV). Shaded portions show relative contributions of Sm2+ and Sm3+. (a) TEY shows the XAS of the surface (approximately 2 nm thickness), while TFY spectra show the bulk response (inset). (b) XMCD TEY and linear combination of Sm2+ and Sm3+ XMCD spectra calculated with xclaim [30]. XMCD was similar for a sample exposed to air (gray triangles). The inset shows XMCD of Sm-deficient and carbon-doped samples.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    TFY (surface) XMCD temperature and magnetic field dependence. (a) XMCD temperature dependence. Circled energies in the main panel indicate TEY XMCD spectra indicative of a single valence (1073.5 eV for Sm2+ and 1100.5 eV for Sm3+). The inset shows the temperature dependence of the fitted Sm2+ and Sm3+ XMCD amplitudes and integrated ΔXMCD relative to 100 K (ΔμL). (b) Magnetic field response of the M5 edge TEY XMCD at 8 K. The inset shows the contributions from Sm2+ and Sm3+. In the insets, the dotted lines show a Langevin fit [μeff=3.6(9)μB, concentration 2.7(5)%] of the combined temperature dependence below 75 K and field dependence at 8 K.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    Bulk properties of nominally pure SmB6 sample. (a) The magnetization data are fit by a Van Vleck contribution (solid black line) and a paramagnetic impurity contribution (shaded) of 1% impurites with μeff=5.2μB. Insets show the susceptibility taken at 5 T and heat capacity with a comparison to the previously published heat capacity of a high-purity sample [40]. We attribute shaded portions to impurities. Sample data also appear in the Supplemental Material of Ref. [19], without fitting. (b) TFY XMCD (bulk). At 8 K, a negative dichroic feature develops from 1081 to 1083 eV as for TEY. The temperature dependence counterindicates solely Sm2+.

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×