Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
  • Editors' Suggestion

Search for electron-neutrino transitions to sterile states in the BEST experiment

V. V. Barinov et al.
Phys. Rev. C 105, 065502 – Published 9 June 2022

Abstract

The Baksan Experiment on Sterile Transitions (BEST) probes the gallium anomaly and its possible connections to oscillations between active and sterile neutrinos. Based on the Gallium-Germanium Neutrino Telescope (GGNT) technology of the SAGE experiment, BEST employs two zones of liquid Ga target to explore neutrino oscillations on the meter scale. Oscillations on this short scale could produce deficits in the Ge71 production rates within the two zones, as well as a possible rate difference between the zones. From July 5th to October 13th 2019, the two-zone target was exposed to a primarily monoenergetic, 3.4-MCi Cr51 neutrino source 10 times for a total of 20 independent Ge71 extractions from the two Ga targets. The Ge71 production rates from the neutrino source were measured from July 2019 to March 2020. At the end of these measurements, the counters were filled with Ge71 doped gas and calibrated during November 2020. In this paper, results from the BEST sterile neutrino oscillation experiment are presented in details. The ratio of the measured Ge71 production rates to the predicted rates for the inner and the outer target volumes are calculated from the known neutrino capture cross section. Comparable deficits in the measured ratios relative to predicted values are found for both zones, with the 4σ deviations from unity consistent with the previously reported gallium anomaly. If interpreted in the context of neutrino oscillations, the deficits give best-fit oscillation parameters of Δm2=3.32.3+eV2 and sin22θ=0.420.17+0.15, consistent with νeνs oscillations governed by a surprisingly large mixing angle.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
7 More
  • Received 18 January 2022
  • Accepted 12 May 2022

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.105.065502

©2022 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Nuclear PhysicsParticles & Fields

Authors & Affiliations

Click to Expand

See Also

Results from the Baksan Experiment on Sterile Transitions (BEST)

V. V. Barinov et al.
Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 232501 (2022)

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 105, Iss. 6 — June 2022

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    The Ga target and extraction piping diagram also indicating the source-handling apparatus.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Flowchart showing the experimental steps of the BEST experiment. Time spent on each step and relevant efficiencies are also presented.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    Flat-top pulses measured in proportional counters. (top) Saturated event induced by high-energy α particles. (bottom) Background candidate event that originates from high-voltage breakdown.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4

    Typical pulse shapes measured in proportional counters. (top) Ge71 K peak candidate event with TN=7.44 ns. (bottom) Background candidate event induced by either Compton scattering or high-energy β particles in K-peak energy region. The slow background event with extended ionization has much slower fall time (TN=30.67 ns) when the pulse begins at 200 ns than the true Ge71 candidate event.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 5
    Figure 5

    (upper panel) Energy vs rise-time histogram of all events of the inner target after the shield-open cut observed in all ten exposures during the first 30 days after extraction. The live time is 245 days, and 1364 events are shown. (lower panel) The same histogram for the 481 events that occurred during an equal live-time interval beginning at 40 days after extraction.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 6
    Figure 6

    (upper panel) energy vs rise-time histogram of all events of the outer target after the shield-open cut observed in all ten exposures during the first 30 days after extraction. The live time is 249 days, and 1387 events are shown. (lower panel) The same histogram for the 504 events that occurred during an equal live-time interval beginning at 40 days after extraction.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 7
    Figure 7

    Plots with energy spectra of selected events for whole dataset showing K and L peaks. (top) Energy spectrum of the inner target. (bottom) Energy spectrum of the outer target.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 8
    Figure 8

    The geometrical dimensions of the Ga targets. All dimensions are in centimeters. There is an empty segment in the spherical vessel due to the thickened wall and the bottom of the re-entrant tube.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 9
    Figure 9

    (top) the measured K + L peak rates of the inner target volume. (middle-top) the production rates of the inner target volume normalized to the reference time (UTC + 3 h). The combined results for events in the L and K peaks are shown separately and compared with the predicted rate. (middle-bottom) the measured K + L peak rates of the outer target volume. (bottom) The production rates of the outer target volume normalized to the reference time (UTC + 3 h). The combined results for events in the L and K peaks are shown separately and compared with the predicted rate. The blue (red) region represents the predicted (measured) production rate. The dotted lines enclose the ±1σ uncertainty regions.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 10
    Figure 10

    Allowed regions for two BEST results. The best-fit point is sin22θ=0.420.17+0.15, Δm2=3.32.3+eV2 and is indicated by a point.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 11
    Figure 11

    Ratios of measured and predicted Ge71 production rates in all Ga source experiments. The combined result is shown as a blue shaded band.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 12
    Figure 12

    Allowed regions for two GALLEX, two SAGE and two BEST results. The best-fit point is sin22θ=0.340.09+0.14, Δm2=1.250.25+eV2 and is indicated by a point.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 13
    Figure 13

    Exclusion contours of all gallium anomaly experiments: two GALLEX, two SAGE, and two BEST results. The blue solid line and the blue tightly dotted line with the blue shadings show the 2σ and 3σ confidence level, respectively. The figure also presents the exclusion contours from Prospect [62], DANSS [63], Stéréo [64], KATRIN [65], the combined analysis of RENO and NEOS data [66], reactor antineutrino anomalies (RAA) [22], interpretations of the MicroBooNE result for the oscillation hypothesis with fixed mixing angle (sin22θ) and profiled over the angle [30], and the model-independent 95% upper bound on sin22θ from all solar neutrino experiments [67]. The 2σ allowed region of Neutrino-4 [68] is also presented and the gray shading represents the merged exclusion of the very short baseline (VSBL) null results.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 14
    Figure 14

    (top) Allowed regions for two BEST results without the first extractions. The best-fit point is sin22θ=0.35, Δm2=6.7eV2 and is indicated by a point. (bottom) Allowed regions for two GALLEX, two SAGE, and two BEST results without the first extractions. The best-fit point is sin22θ=0.31, Δm2=2.85eV2 and is indicated by a point.

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×