Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access

Double-weak decays of Xe124 and Xe136 in the XENON1T and XENONnT experiments

E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration )
Phys. Rev. C 106, 024328 – Published 26 August 2022

Abstract

We present results on the search for two-neutrino double-electron capture (2νECEC) of Xe124 and neutrinoless double-β decay (0νββ) of Xe136 in XENON1T. We consider captures from the K shell up to the N shell in the 2νECEC signal model and measure a total half-life of T1/22νECEC=(1.1±0.2stat±0.1sys)×1022yr with a 0.87kgyr isotope exposure. The statistical significance of the signal is 7.0σ. We use XENON1T data with 36.16kgyr of Xe136 exposure to search for 0νββ. We find no evidence of a signal and set a lower limit on the half-life of T1/20νββ>1.2×1024yrat90%CL. This is the best result from a dark matter detector without an enriched target to date. We also report projections on the sensitivity of XENONnT to 0νββ. Assuming a 275kgyr Xe136 exposure, the expected sensitivity is T1/20νββ>2.1×1025yrat90%CL, corresponding to an effective Majorana mass range of mββ<(0.190.59)eV/c2.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
7 More
  • Received 10 May 2022
  • Accepted 20 July 2022

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.106.024328

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Particles & FieldsNuclear PhysicsGravitation, Cosmology & Astrophysics

Authors & Affiliations

Click to Expand

Article Text

Click to Expand

References

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 106, Iss. 2 — August 2022

Reuse & Permissions
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Comparison of the two 2νECEC signal models discussed in this work: the model from [18] considering K and L1 shells only (black) and the updated model considering shells from K to N5 (orange). The peak widths reflect the energy resolution of XENON1T. Uncertainties associated with the peak scaling, the peak positions and the peak widths are not shown for visibility. The energy region that was excluded due to the low-energy excess reported in [18] is marked in blue.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Fit of the SR2 I125 model to data with χλ2/ndf=138/108. The data from a 2σE interval around the I125 peak at 67.3 keV is subdivided into 1-day bins shown by the black markers. The rate was corrected for statistical coverage and live-time. The 1σ model uncertainty is shown as an orange band around the solid orange best-fit line. The peaks in the rate are caused by three neutron generator calibration campaigns producing I125. The installation of the magnetically coupled piston pump (MagPump) [42], indicated by the dashed black line, marks the separation point of the two model periods. The start of the radon distillation is shown by the dashed golden line.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    Fit of the combined signal and background model to the measured data with χλ2/ndf=517/508=1.02. Uncertainties on the data points are 68.3% Feldman and Cousins confidence intervals [47] on the number of counts per bin scaled with the exposure. The four panels show SR1ain (top left), SR1aout (top right), and SR1bin (bottom left), as well as SR2 (bottom right). The sum spectrum is indicated by the solid red line. Background sources constant in time are shown as solid lines while those that vary over time are shown as dashed lines. The 2νECEC signal peaks are indicated by solid black lines. The residuals were calculated from the square roots of the χλ2 summands.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4

    The χλ2 profile of the double-electron capture decay rate A2νECEC. The minimum is indicated by the dashed orange line. The left y axis gives the Δχλ2 between the best-fit rate at the minimum and the scanned rate. The right y axis marks the significance level for excluding a null result. The significance according to the profile is 7.0σ.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 5
    Figure 5

    Comparison of the 2νECEC half-life with theoretical predictions and the experimental 90% CL lower limits from XMASS [33] (dashed orange) and XENON100 [48] (dashed blue). As previous results considered a signal model with the double-K transition only, the lower limits were scaled down with the double-K capture fraction from this work. The updated central value of the measured half-life is shown as the solid green line. The 1σ and 2σ statistical uncertainty bands are indicated in green. The green uncertainty bar indicates 1σ of the sum of the statistical and the total systematic uncertainty. Four half-life ranges from nuclear structure calculations [36, 49, 50] are indicated in black. The NSM and ET predictions were scaled with the double-K capture fraction while the QRPA ones are already given for the total 2νECEC half-life. The outer bounds of the half-life ranges predicted by all models are within twice the statistical uncertainty of our result.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 6
    Figure 6

    Reconstructed position distribution of events in 4σE regions around the Bi214 and Tl208 peaks at 2204.1 and 2614.5 keV, respectively. The dashed orange line shows the optimized 741 kg FV.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 7
    Figure 7

    Pre-unblinding data (black) and background model fit (red) between 1600 and 3200 keV. The background from materials (gold), the intrinsic Xe136 (blue), and the Bi214 inside the active volume of the TPC (green) and in the LXe shell (dashed green) are also displayed. The bottom panel shows the residuals with the 1σ and 2σ bands. Due to low statistics in the measured data above 2800 keV the residuals over the entire energy range were normalized with the square root of the expected counts from the best-fit model. A hypothetical 0νββ peak at the exclusion sensitivity of 1.7×1024yr is shown in the blinded region (black dashed line).

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 8
    Figure 8

    Parameter pulls of the fit for the blinded (yellow) and unblinded data (black) in units of the constraint uncertainties σ. The parameters describing the 0νββ peak, μ0νββ and σ0νββ, are only present in the fit to the unblinded data.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 9
    Figure 9

    Example of an MS event waveform only rejected by the post-unblinding cut. The primary S2 is indicated by the blue hatched region, while the secondary S2 due to Compton scattering is indicated in orange. The wave form of an SS event should exhibit a single S2 peak such as the one indicated in blue. Without the stricter cut this event was wrongly identified as SS. However, the SS energy was reconstructed only from the main S2 and the energy information of the smaller S2 after the main S2 was not considered. Accordingly, the event was reconstructed at a lower energy than deposited in the event.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 10
    Figure 10

    Comparison of the full energy spectrum with the original cut set (orange) and after the addition of the stricter MS cut (black).

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 11
    Figure 11

    Final data (black) and background model fit (red) between 1600 and 3200 keV with post-unblinding changes.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 12
    Figure 12

    Energy spectrum of all backgrounds relevant for the 0νββ search in XENONnT. Dominant contributions around Qββ arise from material backgrounds (solid orange) and, in particular, from Bi214 in the TPC (solid green), Xe137 (solid purple) and the LXe shell (dash-dotted green). Backgrounds from 2νββ of Xe136 (solid blue) and B8 solar neutrinos (solid pink) are subdominant. The shaded light blue area denotes the 2σE ROI. Event yields for the 2σE range around the Q-value are reported in Table 6.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 13
    Figure 13

    Expected median sensitivity for the lower limit on the half-life of Xe1360νββ decay for XENONnT derived from Asimov data [29] with its 1σ statistical uncertainty. The projected sensitivity and the observed results from XENON1T, KamLAND-Zen [8] and EXO-200 [52] are shown as solid and dashed lines, respectively.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 14
    Figure 14

    Effective Majorana neutrino mass mββ for XENONnT projection after 1000 days (violet), XENON1T (blue), and neutrino mass ordering depending on the mass of the lightest neutrino mlightest. The current best experimental limits for different double-β candidate isotopes are shown in the right panel. The values for Xe136, Ge76, Te130, and Mo100 are taken from [8, 73, 74, 75], respectively.

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

×

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×