Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Nuclear level densities and γ-ray strength functions of Sn111,112,113 isotopes studied with the Oslo method

M. Markova, A. C. Larsen, G. M. Tveten, P. von Neumann-Cosel, T. K. Eriksen, F. L. Bello Garrote, L. Crespo Campo, F. Giacoppo, A. Görgen, M. Guttormsen, K. Hadynska-Klek, M. Klintefjord, T. Renstrøm, E. Sahin, S. Siem, and T. G. Tornyi
Phys. Rev. C 108, 014315 – Published 14 July 2023

Abstract

The Sn111,112,113 isotopes have been studied with (p,dγ), (p,pγ), and (d,pγ) reactions to extract the nuclear level densities (NLDs) and γ-ray strength functions (GSFs) of these nuclei below the neutron separation energy by means of the Oslo method. The experimental NLDs for all three nuclei demonstrate a trend compatible with the constant-temperature model below the neutron separation energy while also being in good agreement with the NLDs of neighboring Sn isotopes, obtained previously with the Oslo-type and neutron evaporation experiments. The extracted microcanonical entropies yield 1.5 kB entropy of a valence neutron in both Sn111 and Sn113. Moreover, the deduced microcanonical temperatures indeed suggest a clear constant-temperature behavior above 3 MeV in Sn111,113 and above 4.5 MeV in Sn112. We observe signatures for the first broken neutron pairs between 2 and 4 MeV in all three nuclei. The GSFs obtained with the Oslo method are found to be in good agreement below the neutron threshold with the strengths of Sn112,114 extracted in the (p,p) Coulomb excitation experiments.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
2 More
  • Received 7 March 2023
  • Accepted 27 June 2023

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.108.014315

©2023 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Nuclear Physics

Authors & Affiliations

M. Markova1,*, A. C. Larsen1,†, G. M. Tveten1,2, P. von Neumann-Cosel3, T. K. Eriksen1, F. L. Bello Garrote1, L. Crespo Campo1, F. Giacoppo4, A. Görgen1, M. Guttormsen1, K. Hadynska-Klek5, M. Klintefjord1, T. Renstrøm1,2, E. Sahin1, S. Siem1, and T. G. Tornyi1

  • 1Department of Physics, University of Oslo, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
  • 2Expert Analytics AS, N-0179 Oslo, Norway
  • 3Institut für Kernphysik, Technische Universität Darmstadt, D-64289 Darmstadt, Germany
  • 4GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Planckstraße 1, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
  • 5Heavy Ion Laboratory, University of Warsaw, Ludwika Pasteura 5A, 05-077 Warszawa, Poland

  • *maria.markova@fys.uio.no
  • a.c.larsen@fys.uio.no

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 108, Iss. 1 — July 2023

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Experimental raw pγ coincidence (a), unfolded (b), and primary (c) matrices for Sn112 obtained in the (p,pγ) reaction. Yellow lines indicate the neutron separation energy of Sn112. Red solid lines indicate the area of the primary matrix used in the Oslo method. The bin width is 124 keV for both axes. Blue arrows mark the sequence of the analysis steps.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Experimental primary spectra for 5.2 MeV (a), 6.4 MeV (b), 7.6 MeV (c), and 8.9 MeV (d) excitation energy bins compared to the spectra predicted with the derived level density and γ-transmission coefficient [from Eq. (1)]. The excitation energy bins are 124 keV wide.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    Experimental NLDs of Sn111 (a), Sn112 (b), and Sn113 (c). The ρ(Sn) values are marked as crosses, and discrete levels are presented as hatched histograms. The gray-shaded areas mark the lower and higher excitation energy normalization regions.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4

    Comparison of the experimental nuclear level densities for Sn115 [47], Sn116 [16], and Sn117 [16], shown together with the ρ(Sn) values, and the present data for Sn111,112,113.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 5
    Figure 5

    Experimental entropies for Sn111,112,113 (a) and entropy differences ΔS(Sn111Sn112) and ΔS(Sn113Sn112) (b). Light and darker gray-shaded areas below 2 and 1 MeV indicate the areas where the entropies for Sn112 and Sn111,113, respectively, are disregarded. Horizontal lines correspond to χ2 fits with constant functions.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 6
    Figure 6

    Experimental temperatures for Sn111 (a), Sn112 (b), and Sn113 (c). The gray-shaded areas below 2 in Sn112 and below 1 MeV in Sn111,113 indicate the areas where temperatures are not defined. Red solid lines denote the constant-temperature fits in each case.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 7
    Figure 7

    The experimental GSFs for Sn111,112,113, shown together with the (p,p) Coulomb excitation data for Sn112,114 [41].

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 8
    Figure 8

    The experimental GSFs for Sn111 (a), Sn112 (b), and Sn113 (c) shown together with the (p,p) [41] and (γ,n) [53] data for Sn112. The total fits of the experimental data are shown as solid magenta lines and the fits of the IVGDR are marked as solid blue lines. The low-lying E1 and M1 components are shown as dashed black and red lines, respectively.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 9
    Figure 9

    Comparison of experimental GSFs for Sn112, Sn116 [21], Sn118 [21], Sn120 [23], Sn122 [22], and Sn124 [23]. All uncertainty bands are omitted for clarity of the figure.

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×