Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Constraints on the onset of color transparency from quasielastic C12(e,ep) up to Q2=14.2(GeV/c)2

D. Bhetuwal et al. (Hall C Collaboration)
Phys. Rev. C 108, 025203 – Published 14 August 2023

Abstract

Quasielastic scattering on C12(e,ep) was measured in Hall C at Jefferson Lab for spacelike four-momentum transfer squared Q2 in the range of 814.2(GeV/c)2 with proton momenta up to 8.3GeV/c. The experiment was carried out in the upgraded Hall C at Jefferson Lab. It used the existing high-momentum spectrometer and the new super-high-momentum spectrometer to detect the scattered electrons and protons in coincidence. The nuclear transparency was extracted as the ratio of the measured yield to the yield calculated in the plane wave impulse approximation. Additionally, the transparency of the 1s1/2 and 1p3/2 shell protons in C12 was extracted, and the asymmetry of the missing momentum distribution was examined for hints of the quantum chromodynamics prediction of color transparency. All of these results were found to be consistent with traditional nuclear physics and inconsistent with the onset of color transparency.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
7 More
  • Received 27 May 2022
  • Revised 7 April 2023
  • Accepted 17 July 2023

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.108.025203

©2023 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Nuclear Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Click to Expand

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 108, Iss. 2 — August 2023

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Postcalibration response for hodoscopes, shower, preshower, and calorimeter shown for the electron arm (HMS): (a) β, (b) Etot/P (total energy deposited normalized by the central momentum), (c) total number of photoelectrons, (d) Δp /p vs β, (e) Δp /p vs Etot/P, (f) total number of photoelectrons vs Etot/P, (g) Shower energy vs preshower energy, (h) total number of photoelectrons vs β

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Reconstructed sieve aperture pattern for the central target foil in the SHMS. The central hole is half diameter compared to the other sieve holes (6 mm diameter), and two empty sieve positions are observed to be consistent with sieve holes that are blocked.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    The reconstructed angles at the target and momentum for data (blue) and simulated spectra (red) for the measured H(e,ep) reaction with arbitrary normalization. (a)–(d) show the momentum bite (a) Δp/p, (b) vertical angle (xtar), (c) horizontal angle (ytar), and (d) reconstructed horizontal position (ytar) for the electrons in the HMS. (e)–(g) show the (e) momentum bite Δp/p, (f) vertical, (g) horizontal angle, and (h) reconstructed horizontal position for the proton in the SHMS.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4

    Hydrogen missing energy spectra for Q2=8(GeV/c)2 comparing data (blue dots) and Monte Carlo with (red dashed line) and without (black line) radiative correction. The vertical black line at 65 MeV indicates the Emiss cut for hydrogen.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 5
    Figure 5

    Carbon missing energy spectra for Q2=8(GeV/c)2 comparing data (blue dots) and Monte Carlo with (red dashed line) and without (black line) radiative correction. The vertical black line at 80 MeV indicates the Emiss cut for carbon.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 6
    Figure 6

    The comparison between simulation and data through the H(e,ep) reaction (with arbitrary normalization) is shown for the Q2=8(GeV/c)2 setting. The reconstructed W (a) is primarily driven by the electron arm (HMS) reconstruction, while the missing energy (b) includes contributions from the proton arm (SHMS).

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 7
    Figure 7

    Carbon missing energy spectra for the experimental data (blue points) for each of the 4 kinematic settings in Q2: (a) 8, (b) 9.4, (c) 11.4, and (d) 14.4 (GeV/c)2 compared to simulation for the corresponding kinematics (red line). These spectra include both the 1s1/2 and 1p3/2 shell contributions.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 8
    Figure 8

    The solid blue (dashed red) distribution is the simulated 1p3/2 (1s1/2) shell contribution fitted to a Lorentzian distribution and a polynomial background. The black points with error bars (statistical only) are the data distribution from the corresponding Q2=8(GeV/c)2 kinematics.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 9
    Figure 9

    The dashed red distribution is the sum with unit weights of the 1s1/2 shell and 1p3/2 contributions, the solid blue distribution is the a(1s1/2)+b(1p3/2) distribution for best fit to the data as described in the text. The black points with error bars are the data (statistical errors only). All the distributions correspond to Q2=8(GeV/c)2 kinematics.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 10
    Figure 10

    1s1/2 (blue circles) and 1p3/2 shells (red squares) transparency as a function of Q2. The straight lines are fit to a constant value for the respective shells. The error bars on each point show the statistical uncertainty while the bands represent the total systematic uncertainty of the 1p3/2 shell (red), and 1s1/2 shell (blue) transparencies. Note that there is an additional 3.9% model-dependent uncertainty that is not shown in the figure.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 11
    Figure 11

    The ratio of transparencies for the 1s1/2 shell to the 1p3/2 shell protons as a function of Q2. The error bars show the statistical uncertainty, while the band represents the total systematic uncertainty. The solid line shows the fit to a constant value.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 12
    Figure 12

    The missing momentum distribution is shown for the kinematic setting at Q2=8(GeV/c)2 where the simulation is normalized to the data.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 13
    Figure 13

    The measured missing momentum asymmetry as a function of the (a) missing momentum and (b) missing energy for Q2=8.0(GeV/c)2. The band shows the total systematic uncertainty which is the quadrature sum of the 11% uncertainty introduced by the binning in pm and Em and the 4% uncertainty from all the other sources listed in Table. 3. The black line indicates the simulated values for the corresponding points.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 14
    Figure 14

    The ratio of the Apm asymmetry in data to simulation as a function of Q2. The band shows the total systematic uncertainty. The black line is the constant value fit to the data.

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×