Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

New experimental constraint on the W185(n,γ)W186 cross section

A. C. Larsen et al.
Phys. Rev. C 108, 025804 – Published 8 August 2023
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

In this work, we present new data on the W182,183,184(γ,n) cross sections, utilizing a quasi-monochromatic photon beam produced at the NewSUBARU synchrotron radiation facility. Further, we have extracted the nuclear level density and γ-ray strength function of W186 from data on the W186(α,αγ)W186 reaction measured at the Oslo Cyclotron Laboratory. Combining previous measurements on the W186(γ,n) cross section with our new W182,183,184(γ,n) and (α,αγ)W186 data sets, we have deduced the W186γ-ray strength function in the range of 1<Eγ<6 MeV and 7<Eγ<14 MeV. Our data are used to extract the level density and γ-ray strength functions needed as input to the nuclear-reaction code talys, providing an indirect, experimental constraint for the W185(n,γ)W186 cross section and reaction rate. Compared to the recommended Maxwellian-averaged cross section (MACS) in the KADoNiS-1.0 database, our results are on average lower for the relevant energy range kBT[5,100] keV, and we provide a smaller uncertainty for the MACS. The theoretical values of Bao et al. [At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 76, 70 (2000)] and the cross section experimentally constrained on photoneutron data of Sonnabend et al. [Astrophys. J. 583, 506 (2003)] are significantly higher than our result. The lower value by Mohr et al. [Phys. Rev. C 69, 032801(R) (2004)] is in very good agreement with our deduced MACS. Our new results provide an improved uncertainty estimate for the (n,γ)W186 reaction rate, which is one important ingredient in simulations for investigating the neutron density and the Os186,187 production in the s process.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
8 More
  • Received 31 January 2023
  • Accepted 28 June 2023

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.108.025804

©2023 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Nuclear Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Click to Expand

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 108, Iss. 2 — August 2023

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Schematic illustration of the nuclear chart in the W-Re-Os region. The black arrows indicate (n,γ) reactions on stable or near-stable isotopes, the blue dashed arrows show the possible (n,γ) branch on the long-lived W, Re, and Os isotopes, while the pink arrows display the β decay branch.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    A schematic illustration of the experimental set up at NewSUBARU used in the (γ,n) cross-section measurements.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    The simulated energy profiles for the γ beams used. The distributions (integrated over all Eγ) are normalized to unity.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4

    Monochromatic cross sections of 182,183,184W. The error bars contain statistical uncertainties from the number of detected neutrons, the uncertainty in the efficiency of the neutron detector and the uncertainly in the pile-up method used to determine the integrated γ flux on target.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 5
    Figure 5

    Cross sections of 182,183,184W obtained after deconvolution. Also shown are cross sections of W182,184 from Goryachev et al. [35].

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 6
    Figure 6

    (a) Particle-identification spectrum for one of the front strips at 130 with its corresponding back detector (ΔEE banana plot); (b) a zoom on the α-particle banana with the qkinz calculations used for calibration (crosses).

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 7
    Figure 7

    Excitation-energy vs. γ-ray energy matrices of W186. (a) Background-subtracted data; (b) unfolded γ-ray spectra; (c) first-generation γ-ray spectra. The lines indicate the limits set for the further analysis.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 8
    Figure 8

    Experimental first-generation spectra (black crosses) compared to the predicted ones using the extracted level density and γ-transmission coefficient (blue line) for various excitation-energy bins (224-keV wide).

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 9
    Figure 9

    Normalized level density of W186. The discrete levels [57] are binned with the same bin size as our data (224 keV/channel). The dashed line shows the CT-model interpolation between our data and ρ(Sn). The black error bars represent statistical uncertainties from the experiment and systematic errors connected to the unfolding procedure and the first-generation method. The blue band includes also systematic errors from the normalization procedure (see text).

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 10
    Figure 10

    γ-ray transmission coefficient of W186 before normalization. The arrows indicate the fit regions used for determining the extrapolations (see text). The gray data points are not considered further in the analysis due to very low statistics in the first-generation matrix for these γ energies.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 11
    Figure 11

    α-ray strength function of W186. The black error bars represent statistical uncertainties from the experiment and systematic errors connected to the unfolding procedure and the first-generation method. The blue band includes also systematic errors from the normalization procedure (see text).

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 12
    Figure 12

    Comparison of the level-density data from this work with models included in the talys code (see text).

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 13
    Figure 13

    (a) Comparison of γ-strength data from this work with data from the literature (Berman et al. [80], Mohr et al. [9], and Kopecky et al. [81]), and to models included in the talys code (see text); (b) fit to the γ-ray strength function data of W186 and the W184 data of Kopecky et al. [81]) (see text).

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 14
    Figure 14

    Maxwellian-averaged cross section for the W185(n,γ) reaction. The shaded band indicates the present data-constrained MACS. The thick, azure dashed-dotted line shows the talys result using default input, the thin, azure dashed lines show the talys MACS when varying the level-density models, and the thin, cyan lines show the variation due to different γ-strength models. The dotted line shows the deviation from the default when using the optical-model potential of Bauge et al. [91].

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 15
    Figure 15

    Reaction rate for the W185(n,γ) reaction. The shaded band indicates the present data-constrained result. See also the caption of Fig. 14.

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×