Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Dissipation of angular momentum in light heavy-ion collision

C. Bhattacharya, S. Bhattacharya, T. Bhattacharjee, A. Dey, S. Kundu, S. R. Banerjee, P. Das, S. K. Basu, and K. Krishan
Phys. Rev. C 69, 024607 – Published 25 February 2004

Abstract

The inclusive energy distributions of fragments (4Z7) emitted in the reactions O16(116MeV)+Al27, Si28, Ne20(145MeV)+Al27, Co59 have been measured in the angular range θlab=10°65°. The respective fusion-fission and deep inelastic contributions have been decomposed from the experimental fragment energy spectra. The angular momentum dissipations in fully damped deep inelastic collisions have been estimated assuming exit channel configuration similar to those for fusion-fission process. It has been found that, the angular momentum dissipations are more than those predicted by the empirical sticking limit in all cases. The deviation is found to increase with increasing charge transfer (lighter fragments). Qualitatively, this may be due to stronger friction in the exit channel. Moreover, for the heavier system Ne20+Co59, the overall magnitude of deviation is less as compared to those for the lighter systems, i.e., O16+Al27, Si28, Ne20+Al27. This may be due to lesser overlap in time scales of fusion and deep inelastic time scales for heavier systems.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
2 More
  • Received 12 July 2003

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.69.024607

©2004 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

C. Bhattacharya, S. Bhattacharya, T. Bhattacharjee, A. Dey, S. Kundu, S. R. Banerjee, P. Das, S. K. Basu, and K. Krishan

  • Variable Energy Cyclotron Centre, 1∕AF Bidhan Nagar, Kolkata 700 064, India

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 69, Iss. 2 — February 2004

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1
    Typical energy spectra of different fragments obtained at 15° for the O16+Al27 reaction. Dotted, dash-dotted, and solid curves represent contributions of FF, DI, and their sum (FF+DI), respectively. Left and right arrows correspond to the centroids of FF and DI energy distributions, respectively.Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2
    Energy spectra of carbon and nitrogen fragments at 20° and 40° for the O16+Al27 reaction. Dotted, dash-dotted, and solid curves represent contributions of FF, DI, and their sum (FF+DI), respectively. Left and right arrows correspond to the centroids of FF and DI energy distributions, respectively.Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3
    Same as Fig. 2 at 15° and 40° for the O16+Si28 reaction.Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4
    Same as Fig. 2 at 12.5° and 30° for the Ne20+Al27 reaction.Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 5
    Figure 5
    Same as Fig. 2 at 20° and 45° for the Ne20+Co59 reaction.Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 6
    Figure 6
    Variation of total elemental yields σ(Z) of FF (left) and DI (right) components, plotted as function of fragment charge Z for different systems. Circle, square, triangle, and inverted triangle correspond to the experimental estimates of σ(Z) for the reactions O16(116MeV)+Al27, O16(116MeV)+Si28, Ne20(145MeV)+Al27, and Ne20(145MeV)+Co59, respectively. The solid histograms are the corresponding EHFM predictions of the total elemental FF yields.Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 7
    Figure 7
    Variation of cross sections of FF and DI components for carbon fragment, plotted as function of center of mass angle θc.m. for different systems. Circle, square, triangle, and inverted triangle correspond to O16(116MeV)+Al27, O16(116MeV)+Si28, Ne20(145MeV)+Al27, and Ne20(145MeV)+Co59, respectively. The dotted curves correspond to fissionlike angular distribution (dσdΩasinθc.m.) fit to the FF component of the data.Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 8
    Figure 8
    Variation of optimum Q values for deep inelastic reaction QDI, plotted as function of center of mass angle θc.m. for different systems. Circle, square, triangle, and inverted triangle correspond to the fragments Be, B, C, and N, respectively. Curves are drawn to guide the eye.Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 9
    Figure 9
    Variation of angular momentum dissipation factor f with fragment. The filled circles are extracted from the data, solid and dotted curves correspond to sticking limit and rolling limit predictions, respectively.Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×