Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Characterizing the atomic mass surface beyond the proton drip line via α-decay measurements of the πs1/2 ground state of 165Re and the πh11/2 isomer in 161Ta

A. Thornthwaite et al.
Phys. Rev. C 86, 064315 – Published 18 December 2012

Abstract

The α-decay chains originating from the πs1/2 and πh11/2 states in 173Au have been investigated following fusion-evaporation reactions. Four generations of α radioactivities have been correlated with 173Aum leading to a measurement of the α decay of 161Tam. It has been found that the known α decay of 161Ta, which was previously associated with the decay of the ground state, is in fact the decay of an isomeric state. This work also reports on the first observation of prompt γ rays feeding the ground state of 173Au. This prompt γ radiation was used to aid the study of the α-decay chain originating from the πs1/2 state in 173Au. Three generations of α decays have been correlated with this state, leading to the observation of a previously unreported activity which is assigned as the decay of 165Reg. This work also reports the excitation energy of an α-decaying isomer in 161Ta and the Qα value of the decay of 161Tag.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 11 October 2012

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.86.064315

©2012 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Click to Expand

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 86, Iss. 6 — December 2012

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1
    Schematic decay chains originating from the πs1/2 ground state of 177Tl and the πh11/2 isomeric state in 177Tl. The nuclides written in blue bold italic font have had their mass excesses measured directly [2, 3]. The decay Q values, half-lives, and branching ratios are indicated. Data not measured as a result of the present study are taken from Refs. [1, 16, 17, 18, 21, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39]. Those decays which have been observed or deduced for the first time or have been reassigned as a result of the present work are indicated by wider red arrows.Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2
    Spectra showing (a) all decays observed in the DSSDs within 100 ms of a recoil implantation in the same pixel; (b) all decays following the detection of a 173Aum α decay occurring within 100 ms of a recoil implantation in the same pixel; (c) all decays following the observation of both 173Aum and 169Irm α decays such that the former were detected within 100 ms of a recoil implantation in the same pixel; (d) all fourth-generation α decays following the observation of an initial α decay within 100 ms of recoil implantation and the subsequent detection of the α decays of both 169Irm and 165Rem.Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3
    (a) Background-subtracted prompt γ-ray spectrum in delayed coincidence with 173Aug α decay. (b) Projection of a 173Aug α-tagged γγ matrix gated on a 327 keV transition.Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4
    Spectra showing (a) all decays observed in the DSSDs within 100 ms of a recoil implantation in the same pixel and in delayed coincidence with prompt γ rays of 327 or 726 keV; (b) all second-generation decays following the detection of a 173Aug α decay occurring within 100 ms of a recoil implantation in the same pixel and with the same γ-ray conditions as (a); (c) third-generation decays, subject to the same conditions as (b) but which were also preceded by an α decay having an energy <6030 keV.Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 5
    Figure 5
    Experimental α-decay Q values of odd-Z, even-N nuclei relevant to the discussion of the present work. Panel (a) shows the Qα values for high-spin states (associated with πh11/2 orbital) while in (b) the Qα values for the low-spin states (πs1/2) are shown. The symbols representing the Qα values determined as a result of the present work have been colored red and enlarged. Data not measured as a result of the present work are taken from Refs. [4, 29, 30, 33, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47].Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 6
    Figure 6
    Differences between mass excesses deduced in the present work and values reported in the most recent Atomic Mass Evaluation [22, 23]. The dashed line indicates zero difference.Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×