Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Search for η-mesic 4He with the WASA-at-COSY detector

P. Adlarson et al. (WASA-at-COSY Collaboration)
Phys. Rev. C 87, 035204 – Published 8 March 2013

Abstract

An exclusive measurement of the excitation function for the dd3Hepπ reaction was performed at the Cooler Synchrotron COSY-Jülich with the WASA-at-COSY detection system. The data were taken during a slow acceleration of the beam from 2.185 to 2.400 GeV/c crossing the kinematic threshold for the η-meson production in the dd4Heη reaction at 2.336 GeV/c. The corresponding excess energy with respect to the 4He-η system varied from 51.4 to 22 MeV. The integrated luminosity in the experiment was determined using the dd3Hen reaction. The shape of the excitation function for the dd3Hepπ reaction was examined. No signal of the 4He-η bound state was observed. An upper limit for the cross section for the bound state formation and decay in the process dd(4Heη)bound3Hepπ was determined on the 90% confidence level and it varies from 20 to 27 nb for the bound state width ranging from 5 to 35 MeV, respectively.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
2 More
  • Received 4 January 2013

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.87.035204

©2013 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Click to Expand

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 87, Iss. 3 — March 2013

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Experimental spectrum of the energy losses in the first two layers of the forward range hodoscope (FRH). The area used for 3He identification is indicated by the red (solid) line. The empty area below 0.05 GeV in the Edep(FRH1) distribution is due to the preselection condition. The regions corresponding to protons, 3He, and 4He are clearly visible.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Comparison of the Monte Carlo simulation (a) and the experimental spectrum (b) of the energy loss in the plastic scintillator barrel (x axis) combined with the energy deposited in the electromagnetic calorimeter (y axis). The green (light gray) and red (dark gray) curves represent the applied graphical condition to separate protons and pions.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    (a) Distribution of the 3He momentum in the c.m. system simulated for the processes leading to the creation of the 4He-η bound state: dd(4Heη)bound3Hepπ [red (gray) area] and of the phase-space dd3Hepπ reaction (black line). The simulation was done for a momentum of the deuteron beam of 2.307 GeV/c. The Fermi momentum parametrization was taken from Ref. [31]. (b) Experimental distribution of the 3He momentum in the c.m. system. In both plots the dashed line demarcates the signal-poor and the signal-rich regions. The decrease of the counts at 0.48 GeV/c is due to the geometry of the border of the barrel and the endcaps of the scintillator barrel detector that was used in the p-π identification process. This region has no relevance in the next steps of the analysis.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4

    Excitation function for the dd3Hepπ reaction for the signal-rich region corresponding to 3He momentum below 0.3 GeV/c (a) and the signal-poor region with 3He momentum above 0.3 GeV/c (b). The difference of the excitation functions for the signal-rich and signal-poor regions after the normalization to the second bin of Q is shown in panel c. The black solid line represents a straight-line fit. The threshold of 4He-η is marked by the vertical dashed line.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 5
    Figure 5

    (a) Simulated distribution of the p-π opening angle in the c.m. system for the dd(4Heη)bound3Hepπ reaction (red histogram) and for the phase-space dd3Hepπ reaction [blue (solid) line]. (b) Experimental distribution of the p-π opening angle in the c.m. system. In both plots the red dashed line separates the signal-poor and the signal-rich regions.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 6
    Figure 6

    Kinetic energy distribution of protons (a) and π (b) in the c.m. frame obtained from experiment (points) and from the simulations of a signal reaction (lines). The red dashed line indicates the boundary of the applied selection criteria: Ekinpc.m.<200 MeV, Ekinπc.m.(180,400) MeV. Please note that the ranges on the x axes are different.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 7
    Figure 7

    Geometrical acceptance (solid black squares), overall efficiency (open red circles), and luminosity (solid blue triangles) as a function of the excess energy. The right axis denotes the luminosity.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 8
    Figure 8

    Experimental excitation function for the dd3Hepπ reaction obtained after the normalization of the events selected in individual excess energy intervals by the corresponding integrated luminosities. The dotted and solid lines correspond to the second-order and the first-order polynomials fitted to the data.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 9
    Figure 9

    Upper limit at 90% confidence level of the cross section for formation of the 4He-η bound state and its decay via the dd(4Heη)bound3Hepπ reaction as a function of the width of the bound state. The binding energy was set to EBE=20 MeV. The green area at the bottom represents the systematic uncertainties.

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×