Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Shell evolution approaching the N=20 island of inversion: Structure of Mg29

A. Matta et al.
Phys. Rev. C 99, 044320 – Published 29 April 2019

Abstract

The island of inversion for neutron-rich nuclei in the vicinity of N=20 has become the testing ground par excellence for our understanding and modeling of shell evolution with isospin. In this context, the structure of the transitional nucleus Mg29 is critical. The first quantitative measurements of the single-particle structure of Mg29 are reported, using data from the d(Mg28, p γ)Mg29 reaction. Two key states carrying significant =3 (f-wave) strength were identified at 2.40±0.10 (Jπ=5/2) and 4.28±0.04 MeV (7/2). New state-of-the-art shell-model calculations have been performed and the predictions are compared in detail with the experimental results. While the two lowest 7/2 levels are well described, the sharing of single-particle strength disagrees with experiment for both the 3/2 and 5/2 levels and there appear to be general problems with configurations involving the p3/2 neutron orbital and core-excited components. These conclusions are supported by an analysis of the neutron occupancies in the shell-model calculations.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
3 More
  • Received 3 December 2018

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.99.044320

©2019 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Nuclear Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Click to Expand

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 99, Iss. 4 — April 2019

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Evolution of intruder state energies for neutron-rich Mg isotopes approaching the island of inversion. The 3/2+ level is chosen as the energy reference (adapted from Ref. [5]). The transitional character of Mg29 is apparent.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Schematic layout of the experiment, with the beam incident on a deuterated polythene target at the center of the SHARC silicon strip detector array [29], which is surrounded by 12 TIGRESS clover Ge detectors [30] arranged at angles of 90 and 135. Downstream of the target, a passive Al stopper foil prevented fusion-evaporation residues and other contaminant particles from reaching a plastic scintillator detector (TRIFOIL).

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    Spectrum of the relative time between SHARC and TRIFOIL signals for events in which a particle was recorded in SHARC. The main peak corresponds to Mg28-induced direct reactions and the small peaks correspond to Mg28 projectiles by chance being found in nearby beam pulses (see text). By selecting events in a region away from the main peak, a quantitative estimate of the background underlying the peak was obtained.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4

    Kinematic plot showing proton energy as a function of laboratory angle, after correction for energy losses in the target and in the dead layer of the silicon detector. The calculated kinematic line for protons populating the ground state of Mg29 is shown. The origin of the background above this line is discussed in the text.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 5
    Figure 5

    Excitation energy spectrum for Mg29, as deduced from the energy and angle of the proton, for protons having θlab>90. The background at negative excitation energies is attributed to a small fraction of Al28 in the incident beam and is calculated to stop at the Mg29 ground state (see text). The dashed curve shows the probability of any Al28-induced (d,p) reaction products being recorded in the TRIFOIL detector according to geant4 simulations.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 6
    Figure 6

    Doppler-corrected γ-ray energy spectra for θlab(p)>90: (a) events in which the TRIFOIL is triggered (i.e., mostly corresponding to the Mg28-induced (d,p) reaction), (b) with an additional gate of Ex(Mg29)=0.81.5 MeV, (c) as for (b) but 2.02.8 MeV, (d) no TRIFOIL gating (i.e., mostly arising from Si28-induced reactions). The well-known γ rays at 336 keV and 1040 keV from the decay of the 1.431 MeV state are clearly seen in the upper two spectra. Several other tentative peaks from Mg29 are discussed in the text.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 7
    Figure 7

    Differential cross sections for the four main peaks identified in the excitation energy spectrum and listed in Table 2, solid lines are the sum of the different contributions: (a) 0.0 MeV dashed (=0,S=0.34) and dot-dashed (=2,S=0.30), (b) 1.2 MeV dotted (=1,S=0.11) and dot-dashed (=3,S=0.38), (c) 2.4 MeV dot-dashed (=2,S=0.08) and dash-three-dots (=3,S=0.30), (d) 4.2 MeV dash-three-dots (=3,S=0.30).

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 8
    Figure 8

    Comparison of the experimental values of (2J+1)C2S and excitation energies from Table 2 with shell-model values from Table 1 (level associations given in Table 3). Key: red =0, green =1, orange =2, blue =3.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 9
    Figure 9

    Excitation energy spectra for Mg29 corresponding to three restricted angular ranges for protons. Green cross hatched: 100110; red cross hatched: 125135; and blue solid fill: 160170. The number of counts is not corrected for solid angle, which varies sinusoidally with angle and is weighted approximately as 7:6:2 for the three spectra.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 10
    Figure 10

    Energy levels of Mg29. In the experimental level scheme the asterisk (*) denotes the state observed here for the first time and the dotted line shows the neutron separation energy at 3.655 MeV. For clarity, in the shell-model level scheme the first 11/2 state is shown by a dashed line, the first 9/2+ state by a dot-dashed line and the first three 7/2+ levels by dotted lines (note: these five levels, which are included in Table 1, cannot be populated in single-step transfer). Other levels are labeled with their spin and parity, excitation energy in MeV and spectroscopic factor S. The experimental values of S are from the present work. As shown in Table 1 the shell-model energies for the 5/2+ states in the wbc calculation match better with experiment, while keeping the same sequence of spectroscopic factor values as the EEdf1 levels.

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×