Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

First measurement of the Ar(e,e)X cross section at Jefferson Laboratory

H. Dai et al. (The Jefferson Lab Hall A Collaboration)
Phys. Rev. C 99, 054608 – Published 8 May 2019

Abstract

The success of the ambitious programs of both long- and short-baseline neutrino-oscillation experiments employing liquid-argon time-projection chambers will greatly rely on the precision with which the weak response of the argon nucleus can be estimated. In the E12-14-012 experiment at Jefferson Lab Hall A, we studied the properties of the argon nucleus by scattering a high-quality electron beam off a high-pressure gaseous argon target. Here, we present the measured Ar40(e,e) double differential cross section at incident electron energy E=2.222 GeV and scattering angle θ=15.54. The data cover a broad range of energy transfers, where quasielastic scattering and delta production are the dominant reaction mechanisms. The result for argon is compared to our previously reported cross sections for titanium and carbon, obtained in the same kinematical setup.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 29 October 2018

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.99.054608

©2019 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Nuclear PhysicsParticles & FieldsAccelerators & Beams

Authors & Affiliations

Click to Expand

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 99, Iss. 5 — May 2019

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Double differential cross section for the Ar(e,e) process, extracted with two different methods, at beam energy of 2.222 GeV and scattering angle of 15.54. The inner and outer bars correspond to the statistical and total uncertainty, respectively. The dotted curve represents the quasielastic calculations obtained within the RGF formalism described in Ref. [31].

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Comparison of Ar(e,e) cross section of Fig. 1, and Ti(e,e) and C(e,e) cross sections of Ref. [23], all in the same kinematics, presented in terms of the ratio defined by Eq. (4).

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    Comparison between the scaling function of the second kind, f(ψ), obtained from E12-14-012 data on Ar, Ti, and C. The kF of C is fixed to the value obtained by Moniz et al. [35] while the data analysis of Ti and Ar sets kF at 240 and 245 MeV, respectively. The circles are the Ar data from LNF [11], which turn out to prefer an inconsistently higher value of kF.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4

    Comparison between the scaling function F(y) obtained from the E12-14-012 data on argon, titanium, and carbon, and the argon data obtained at LNF [11].

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×