Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
  • Open Access

Parton distributions from nonlocal chiral SU(3) effective theory: Flavor asymmetries

Y. Salamu, Chueng-Ryong Ji, W. Melnitchouk, A. W. Thomas, P. Wang, and X. G. Wang
Phys. Rev. D 100, 094026 – Published 21 November 2019

Abstract

Using recently derived results for one-loop hadronic splitting functions from a nonlocal implementation of chiral effective theory, we study the contributions from pseudoscalar meson loops to flavor asymmetries in the proton. Constraining the parameters of the regulating functions by inclusive production of n, Δ++, Λ, and Σ*+ baryons in pp collisions, we compute the shape of the light antiquark asymmetry d¯u¯ in the proton and the strange asymmetry ss¯ in the nucleon sea. With these constraints, the magnitude of the d¯u¯ asymmetry is found to be compatible with that extracted from the Fermilab E866 Drell-Yan measurement, with no indication of a sign change at large values of x, and an integrated value in the range d¯u¯0.090.17. The ss¯ asymmetry is predicted to be positive at x>0, with compensating negative contributions at x=0, and an integrated x-weighted moment in the range x(ss¯)(0.92.5)×103.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
1 More
  • Received 19 July 2019

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.094026

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

  1. Research Areas
Particles & FieldsNuclear Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Y. Salamu1,2, Chueng-Ryong Ji3, W. Melnitchouk4, A. W. Thomas5, P. Wang1,6, and X. G. Wang5

  • 1Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS, Beijing 100049, China
  • 2School of Physical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • 3Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA
  • 4Jefferson Lab, Newport News, Virginia 23606, USA
  • 5CoEPP and CSSM, Department of Physics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide SA 5005, Australia
  • 6Theoretical Physics Center for Science Facilities, CAS, Beijing 100049, China

Article Text

Click to Expand

References

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 100, Iss. 9 — 1 November 2019

Reuse & Permissions
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    One-meson loop diagrams contributing to quark and antiquark PDFs in the nucleon, representing (a) the rainbow diagram with octet baryon (solid lines) intermediate state; (b) the rainbow diagram with decuplet baryon (double solid lines) intermediate state; and (c) the meson (dashed lines) bubble diagram. The symbol “” represents an operator insertion.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Contributions to quark PDFs in the nucleon from baryon coupling diagrams, representing (a) coupling to the bare nucleon; (b),(c) contributions from wave function renormalization with octet and decuplet baryon intermediate states; (d) the rainbow diagram with octet baryon; (e),(f) Kroll-Ruderman and gauge link (filled circle) Kroll-Ruderman diagrams with octet baryon; (g) the rainbow diagram with decuplet baryon; (h),(i) Kroll-Ruderman diagrams with decuplet baryon; and (j),(k) meson tadpole and gauge link tadpole diagrams.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    Differential inclusive hadron production cross section σ(y,k2) vs y¯ for (a) ppnX at k2=0 [38]; (b) ppnX integrated over k2 [39]; (c) ppΔ++X integrated over k2 [40], compared with the fitted nonlocal pion exchange contributions for ΛπN=1.0(1)GeV and ΛπΔ=0.9(1)GeV (solid red lines and pink 1σ uncertainty bands) and with Pauli-Villars regularization (dashed red lines) for ΛπN(PV)=0.3GeV and ΛπΔ(PV)=0.64GeV.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4

    The flavor asymmetry of the proton x(d¯u¯) vs x from the lowest order pion exchange (solid red curve and pink band), with cutoff parameters ΛπN=1.0(1)GeV and ΛπΔ=0.9(1)GeV, including nucleon on-shell (dashed blue line), Δ on-shell (dashed green line), and Δ end-point (dotted green line) contributions, and compared with the asymmetry extracted from the Fermilab E615 Drell-Yan experiment [4].

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 5
    Figure 5

    Contributions to the d¯u¯ moment vs the dipole cutoff parameter Λ (=ΛπN or ΛπΔ) from (a) the πN rainbow diagram [Fig. 1], including on-shell (solid red line), and local (dotted blue line) and nonlocal (dot-dashed green line) δ-function terms; (b) the pion bubble [Fig. 1], including local (dotted blue line) and nonlocal (dot-dashed green line) δ-function pieces; (c) the πΔ rainbow [Fig. 1], including on-shell (solid red line), end-point (dashed red line), local (dotted blue line) and nonlocal (dot-dashed green line) δ-function, and local decuplet δ-function (dotted black line) contributions.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 6
    Figure 6

    Differential inclusive hadron production cross section σ(y,k2) vs y¯ for (a) ppΛX at k=0.075GeV [39]; (b) ppΛX integrated over k2 [41]; and (c) ppΣ*+X integrated over k2 [42], compared with the fitted nonlocal kaon exchange contributions for dipole regulator parameters ΛKΛ=1.1(1)GeV and ΛKΣ*=0.8(1)GeV (solid red lines and pink 1σ uncertainty bands).

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 7
    Figure 7

    Kaon loop contributions to (a) antistrange PDF xs¯ from the octet and decuplet rainbow diagrams [Figs. 1 and 1]; (b) strange quark PDF xs from the octet rainbow [Fig. 2], Kroll-Ruderman [Figs. 2 and 2], and tadpole [Figs. 2 and 2] diagrams; (c) strange PDF xs from the decuplet rainbow [Fig. 2] and Kroll-Ruderman [Figs. 2 and 2] diagrams; (d) strange asymmetry x(ss¯), showing the local and nonlocal (gauge) octet and decuplet contributions, along with the total asymmetry. The PDFs are computed with the best fit regulator parameters ΛKΛ=ΛKΣ=1.1GeV and ΛKΣ*=0.8GeV.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 8
    Figure 8

    Contributions to the x(ss¯) moment vs the dipole cutoff parameter Λ (=ΛKY, for Y=Λ or Σ hyperons, or ΛKΣ*) from (a) the KY octet rainbow [Figs. 1 and 2] and Kroll-Ruderman [Figs. 22] diagrams; (b) the K bubble [Fig. 1] and tadpole [Figs. 2 and 2] diagrams; (c) the KΣ* decuplet rainbow [Figs. 1 and 2] and Kroll-Ruderman [Fig. 2 and 2] diagrams.

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

×

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×