Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
  • Open Access

Signatures of R˜2 class of leptoquarks at the upcoming ep colliders

Rojalin Padhan, Sanjoy Mandal, Manimala Mitra, and Nita Sinha
Phys. Rev. D 101, 075037 – Published 20 April 2020

Abstract

We explore the signatures of the R˜2 class of leptoquark (LQ) models at the proposed ep and e+p colliders. We carry out an analysis for the proposed colliders, LHeC, and FCC-eh, with center of mass (c.m.) energy 1.3 TeV and 3.46 TeV, respectively. For R˜2 class of LQ models, there are a number of final states that can arise from LQs production and their subsequent decays. In this report we do a detailed cut-based analysis for the l±j final state. We also discuss the effect of polarized electron and positron beams on LQ production and in turn on l±j production. At LHeC, the final state l+j has a very good discovery prospect. We find that, with only 100fb1 of data, one can probe LQs of masses up to 1.2 TeV with 5σ significance, even with a generic set of cuts. On the contrary, at FCC-eh, one can probe LQ masses upto 2.2 TeV (for e beam) and 3 TeV (for e+ beam), at more than 5σ significance with luminosity 1000fb1 and 500fb1, respectively.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
4 More
  • Received 21 January 2020
  • Accepted 30 March 2020

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.075037

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Particles & Fields

Authors & Affiliations

Rojalin Padhan1,2,*, Sanjoy Mandal1,2,†, Manimala Mitra1,2,‡, and Nita Sinha3,2,§

  • 1Institute of Physics, Sachivalaya Marg, Bhubaneswar 751005, India
  • 2Homi Bhabha National Institute, BARC Training School Complex, Anushakti Nagar, Mumbai 400094, India
  • 3The Institute of Mathematical Sciences, C.I.T Campus, Taramani, Chennai 600 113, India

  • *rojalin.p@iopb.res.in
  • smandal@iopb.res.in
  • manimala@iopb.res.in
  • §nita@imsc.res.in

Article Text

Click to Expand

References

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 101, Iss. 7 — 1 April 2020

Reuse & Permissions
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Upper panel: Feynman diagram for the gluon-initiated LQ pair-production process at LHC. Lower panel: the same, but for the quark-initiated processes.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Present limit on scalar LQ pair-production times branching fraction to eejj final state as a function of mass for first generation LQs from CMS experiment with s=13TeV and luminosity 35.9fb1. The red and black lines are the expected and observed limits. The green line is the theory prediction.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    Feynman diagram for the lj production in ep collider.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4

    Single LQ production at LHC.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 5
    Figure 5

    Upper panel: comparison of single LQ production at LHeC with respect to single or pair production of LQ at LHC. Lower panel: cross section for single LQ production at e+p and ep collider for various proton beam energies. The electron or positron beam has been fixed at 60 GeV. In both these cases, the coupling Yde has been varied as 0.34MLQ1TeV, in agreement with the APV constraints. For these plots we have considered Z11=0.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 6
    Figure 6

    Production cross section of lj (l+j) with and without 80% left(right)- polarized electron (positron) beam. The dotted and solid lines represent the variation of production cross section with and without the polarized electron or positron beam. Upper panel is for LHeC and lower panel is for FCC-eh. In both these cases, the coupling Yde has been varied as 0.34MLQ1TeV, in agreement with the APV constraints and we have fixed Z11=0.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 7
    Figure 7

    Variation of σ(eplj) in Y11MLQ plane. Blue region is disallowed from atomic parity violation. The upper region corresponding to each of the dashed (Z11=0.42), dotted (Z11=0.62), and dotted-dashed (Z11=1.03) line is disallowed from 13 TeV LHC search [34], where we consider the combined limit on branching ratio from [34]. The color bar indicates the cross section for eplj for 60 GeV electron and 7 TeV proton beam. We consider BP1 for this plot.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 8
    Figure 8

    Normalized distribution of transverse momentum of leading lepton pT(l1), leading jet pT(j1), invariant mass of leading lepton and jet M(l1j1) for both signal and background with c.m.energy s=1.3TeV. Here the parameter set given in Table 1 is considered.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 9
    Figure 9

    Normalized distribution of transverse momentum of leading lepton pT(l1), leading jet pT(j1), invariant mass of leading lepton and jet M(l1j1) for both signal and background with c.m.energy s=3.46TeV. Here the parameter set given in Table 1 is considered.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 10
    Figure 10

    Upper panel: Signal cross section after cut. Lower panel: Required luminosity to reach 3σ and 5σ significance versus mass of the LQ with c.m.energy 1.3 TeV. Since at LHeC c.m.energy is low to get a better signal cross section we use the optimum values of the couplings for a given LQ mass, which are given in Table 2.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 11
    Figure 11

    Upper panel: Signal cross section after cut. Lower panel: Required gs for all LQ masses as given in Table 1 for MLQ=1TeV.

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

×

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×