Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Dynamical -boson stars: Generic stability and evidence for nonspherical solutions

Víctor Jaramillo, Nicolas Sanchis-Gual, Juan Barranco, Argelia Bernal, Juan Carlos Degollado, Carlos Herdeiro, and Darío Núñez
Phys. Rev. D 101, 124020 – Published 11 June 2020

Abstract

-boson stars are static, spherical, multifield self-gravitating solitons. They are asymptotically flat, finite energy solutions of Einstein’s gravity minimally coupled to an odd number of massive, complex scalar fields. A previous study assessed the stability of -boson stars under spherical perturbations, finding that there are both stable and unstable branches of solutions, as for single-field boson stars (=0). In this work we probe the stability of -boson stars against nonspherical perturbations by performing numerical evolutions of the Einstein-Klein-Gordon system, with a 3D code. For the timescales explored, the -boson stars belonging to the spherical stable branch do not exhibit measurable growing modes. We find, however, evidence of zero modes; that is, nonspherical perturbations that neither grow nor decay. This suggests the branching off toward a larger family of equilibrium solutions: we conjecture that -boson stars are the enhanced isometry point of a larger family of static (and possibly stationary), nonspherical multifield self-gravitating solitons.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 24 April 2020
  • Accepted 19 May 2020

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.124020

© 2020 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Gravitation, Cosmology & Astrophysics

Authors & Affiliations

Víctor Jaramillo1, Nicolas Sanchis-Gual2, Juan Barranco3, Argelia Bernal3, Juan Carlos Degollado4, Carlos Herdeiro5, and Darío Núñez1

  • 1Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Exterior C.U., A.P. 70-543, México D.F. 04510, México
  • 2Centro de Astrofísica e Gravitação—CENTRA, Departamento de Física, Instituto Superior Técnico—IST, Universidade de Lisboa—UL, Avenida Rovisco Pais 1, 1049-001, Portugal
  • 3Departamento de Física, División de Ciencias e Ingenierías, Campus León, Universidad de Guanajuato, León 37150, México
  • 4Instituto de Ciencias Físicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apdo. Postal 48-3, 62251, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México
  • 5Departamento de Matemática da Universidade de Aveiro and Centre for Research and Development in Mathematics and Applications (CIDMA), Campus de Santiago, 3810-183 Aveiro, Portugal

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 101, Iss. 12 — 15 June 2020

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    ADM mass vs frequency for static -boson stars. The properties of models M1, M2 and M3 are listed in Table 1.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Evolution of ηz as a function of time for unperturbed (black solid line) and perturbed density as defined by Eq. (3.1) (red solid line) with κ=0.01. Top panel: the unperturbed configuration is a single-field boson star (=0). Bottom panel: the unperturbed configuration is a multifield boson star (=1). In neither perturbed case has a bar instability been observed. Instead, a long lived departure from spherical symmetry occurs for =1, but not for =0, as long as ηz0. In contrast, the unperturbed configurations preserve spherical symmetry as ηz oscillates around zero in both cases.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    Distortion parameter ηy, for model M1 for runs shown in Table 3. Departure from spherical symmetry is shown for those configurations that have been perturbed differently in all the three fields ϕ1,1, ϕ1,0 and ϕ1,1. On the contrary, the configuration M1000 has the same perturbation for all the fields (spherical perturbation), and it shows ηy=0 at all times.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4

    Evolution of the mass of the model M1 subjected to spherical and nonspherical perturbations listed in Tables 2 and 3 respectively. The mass, as expected, is increased for those perturbations with ε>0 and decreases when ε<0.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 5
    Figure 5

    Three snapshots of the projection of the rest mass density in two planes. In the second snapshot the star expands and thus the maximum value of the density decreases. In the third snapshot the star returns to its original state. This repetitive behavior is present during all the evolution time. The mesh represent a box with sides 12R99 of the unperturbed star.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 6
    Figure 6

    Convergence for run M1000: Evolution of the L2-norm of the Hamiltonian constraint for three different resolutions rescaled to show fourth order convergence. Green line shows L2-norm of the Hamiltonian constrain for a perturbed run, initially, the violation of the constraint due to the perturbation is evident, as time passes the magnitude of the error is comparable with the error of the unperturbed runs.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 7
    Figure 7

    Convergence for run M1000: Evolution of the mass for three different resolutions.

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review D

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×