Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
  • Open Access

Search for hep solar neutrinos and the diffuse supernova neutrino background using all three phases of the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory

B. Aharmim et al. (SNO Collaboration)
Phys. Rev. D 102, 062006 – Published 29 September 2020

Abstract

A search has been performed for neutrinos from two sources, the hep reaction in the solar pp fusion chain and the νe component of the diffuse supernova neutrino background (DSNB), using the full dataset of the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory with a total exposure of 2.47ktonyears after fiducialization. The hep search is performed using both a single-bin counting analysis and a likelihood fit. We find a best-fit flux that is compatible with solar model predictions while remaining consistent with zero flux, and set a one-sided upper limit of Φhep<30×103cm2s1 [90% credible interval (CI)]. No events are observed in the DSNB search region, and we set an improved upper bound on the νe component of the DSNB flux of ΦνeDSNB<19cm2s1 (90% CI) in the energy range 22.9<Eν<36.9MeV.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 15 July 2020
  • Accepted 1 September 2020

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.062006

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Particles & FieldsNuclear Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Click to Expand

Article Text

Click to Expand

References

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 102, Iss. 6 — 15 September 2020

Reuse & Permissions
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    The SNO detector [5].

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Efficiency of the high-level event selection cuts for phase I, compared between calibration sample data (points) and Monte Carlo (shaded boxes). The calibration samples include deployed Li8 [21] and pT [33] sources and Michel electrons from muons that stop and decay inside the detector.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    Reconstructed energy spectra for each phase.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4

    The posterior distribution for the hep flux, marginalized over all other fit parameters, with the 90% and 1σ credible intervals. The BSB05(GS98) standard solar model prediction [7, 8] is also shown for comparison.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 5
    Figure 5

    Distributions of events in the full dataset compared to the best fit in the joint three-phase likelihood analysis, with projections shown for each phase and fit observable. Distributions are shown over the full energy range of the fit, 10–20 MeV. The model and systematic uncertainties are discussed in Secs. 3e and 3f, respectively, with the extraction of the hep flux described in Sec. 4b.

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

×

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×