Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Unruh and analogue Unruh temperatures for circular motion in 3+1 and 2+1 dimensions

Steffen Biermann, Sebastian Erne, Cisco Gooding, Jorma Louko, Jörg Schmiedmayer, William G. Unruh, and Silke Weinfurtner
Phys. Rev. D 102, 085006 – Published 13 October 2020

Abstract

The Unruh effect states that a uniformly linearly accelerated observer with proper acceleration a experiences Minkowski vacuum as a thermal state in the temperature Tlin=a/(2π), operationally measurable via the detailed balance condition between excitation and deexcitation probabilities. An observer in uniform circular motion experiences a similar Unruh-type temperature Tcirc, operationally measurable via the detailed balance condition, but Tcirc depends not just on the proper acceleration but also on the orbital radius and on the excitation energy. We establish analytic results for Tcirc for a massless scalar field in 3+1 and 2+1 spacetime dimensions in several asymptotic regions of the parameter space, and we give numerical results in the interpolating regions. In the ultrarelativistic limit, we verify that in 3+1 dimensions Tcirc is of the order of Tlin uniformly in the energy, as previously found by Unruh, but in 2+1 dimensions, Tcirc is significantly lower at low energies. We translate these results to an analogue spacetime nonrelativistic field theory in which the circular acceleration effects may become experimentally testable in the near future. We establish in particular that the circular motion analogue Unruh temperature grows arbitrarily large in the near-sonic limit, encouragingly for the experimental prospects, but the growth is weaker in effective spacetime dimension 2+1 than in 3+1.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 29 July 2020
  • Accepted 21 September 2020

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.085006

© 2020 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Particles & FieldsGravitation, Cosmology & Astrophysics

Authors & Affiliations

Steffen Biermann1,*, Sebastian Erne1,2,3,†, Cisco Gooding1,‡, Jorma Louko1,§, Jörg Schmiedmayer2,∥, William G. Unruh4,5,¶, and Silke Weinfurtner1,6,**

  • 1School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom
  • 2Vienna Center for Quantum Science and Technology, Atominstitut, TU Wien, Stadionallee 2, A-1020 Vienna, Austria
  • 3Wolfgang Pauli Institut, c/o Fak. Mathematik, Universität Wien, Nordbergstrasse 15, 1090 Vienna, Austria
  • 4Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6T 1Z1, Canada
  • 5Hagler Institute for Advanced Study and Institute for Quantum Science and Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-4242, USA
  • 6Centre for the Mathematics and Theoretical Physics of Quantum Non-Equilibrium Systems, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom

  • *steffen.biermann@nottingham.ac.uk
  • erne@atomchip.org
  • cisco.gooding@nottingham.ac.uk
  • §jorma.louko@nottingham.ac.uk
  • schmiedmayer@atomchip.org
  • unruh@physics.ubc.ca
  • **silke.weinfurtner@nottingham.ac.uk

See Also

Interferometric Unruh Detectors for Bose-Einstein Condensates

Cisco Gooding, Steffen Biermann, Sebastian Erne, Jorma Louko, William G. Unruh, Jörg Schmiedmayer, and Silke Weinfurtner
Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 213603 (2020)

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 102, Iss. 8 — 15 October 2020

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Relativistic spacetime TratTcirc/Tlin as a function of v and EredE/a, for 0.1v0.95 and 0.1Ered3. The plotting range was chosen for numerical stability, avoiding small and large values of v and small and large values of Ered. Left in 3+1 dimensions, evaluated from (2.6) with (3.2); right in 2+1 dimensions, evaluated from (2.6) with (4.4). In the limit Ered0, outside the plotted range, the 3+1 graph tends to a nonzero value, as seen from (3.9), while the 2+1 graph has a significant drop, tending to zero linearly in Ered, as seen from (4.10). The continuations of the graphs to the ultrarelativistic limit v1, outside the plotted range, are shown in Fig. 4.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Analogue spacetime TrlabT^circ/T^lin as a function of v and ErlabE^/a^, for 0.1v0.95 and 0.1Erlab3. The plotting range was again chosen for numerical stability, avoiding small and large values of v and small and large values of Erlab. Left in 3+1 dimensions; right in 2+1 dimensions. The data are as in Fig. 1, and Trlab=Trat, but Erlab=γEred. In the limit Ered0, outside the plotted range, it is again the case that the 3+1 graph tends to a nonzero value while the 2+1 graph has a significant drop, tending to zero linearly in Ered. In the near-sonic limit v1, outside the plotted range, the 3+1 graph tends to the constant value π/(23)0.9, as seen from (5.5a), but the 2+1 graph drops to zero proportionally to 1/ln(1v2), as seen from (5.5b); within the plotted range, this drop shows as incipient for 0.9v0.95.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    Relativistic spacetime TratTcirc/Tlin as a function of v in the limits of large and small |E|, showing the continuation of the Fig. 1 plots to these limits. The dashed (blue) curve shows the large |E| limit, in both 3+1 and 2+1 dimensions, evaluated from (2.6) with (3.7). The solid (brown) curve shows the small |E| limit in 3+1 dimensions, evaluated from (3.9). In 2+1 dimensions, the small |E| limit vanishes, as seen from the analytic formula (4.10).

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4

    Relativistic spacetime TratTcirc/Tlin as a function of EredE/a in the ultrarelativistic limit, v1, showing the continuation of the Fig. 1 plots to this limit. The dashed (blue) curve is for 3+1 dimensions, evaluated from (3.12), interpolating between π/31.8 as Ered and π/(23)0.9 as Ered0, as previously found in [42]. The solid (red) curve is for 2+1 dimensions, evaluated from (4.18), interpolating between π/31.8 as Ered and 0 as Ered0, showing the falloff proportional to 1/ln(1/Ered) (4.19a) as Ered0.

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review D

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×