Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
  • Open Access

Study of the lineshape of the χc1(3872) state

R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration)
Phys. Rev. D 102, 092005 – Published 12 November 2020

Abstract

A study of the lineshape of the χc1(3872) state is made using a data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 3fb1 collected in pp collisions at center-of-mass energies of 7 and 8 TeV with the LHCb detector. Candidate χc1(3872) and ψ(2S) mesons from b-hadron decays are selected in the J/ψπ+π decay mode. Describing the lineshape with a Breit-Wigner function, the mass splitting between the χc1(3872) and ψ(2S) states, Δm, and the width of the χc1(3872) state, ΓBW, are determined to be Δm=185.598±0.067±0.068MeV,ΓBW=1.39±0.24±0.10MeV, where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second systematic. Using a Flatté-inspired model, the mode and full width at half maximum of the lineshape are determined to be mode=3871.690.040.13+0.00+0.05MeV,FWHM=0.220.060.13+0.07+0.11MeV. An investigation of the analytic structure of the Flatté amplitude reveals a pole structure, which is compatible with a quasibound D0D¯*0 state but a quasivirtual state is still allowed at the level of 2 standard deviations.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
4 More
  • Received 29 May 2020
  • Accepted 21 September 2020

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.092005

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

© 2020 CERN, for the LHCb Collaboration

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Particles & Fields

Authors & Affiliations

Click to Expand

Article Text

Click to Expand

References

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 102, Iss. 9 — 1 November 2020

Reuse & Permissions
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Mass distributions for J/ψπ+π candidates in the ψ(2S) region for (top) the low, (middle) mid and (bottom) high pπ+π bins. The left- (right-) hand plot is for 2011 (2012) data. The projection of the fit described in the text is superimposed.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Mass distributions for J/ψπ+π candidates in the χc1(3872) region for (top) the low, (middle) mid and (bottom) high pπ+π bins. The left- (right-) hand plot is for 2011 (2012) data. The projection of the fit described in the text is superimposed.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    The coupling to the DD¯* channels g as a function of Flatté energy parameter Ef (black points with error bars). The corresponding change in negative log likelihood, ΔLL is shown as well (red dots).

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4

    Comparison of the Flatté (solid, red) and Breit–Wigner (dotted, black) lineshapes. The left plot shows the raw lineshapes for the default fits. The location of the D0 D¯*0 threshold is indicated by the blue vertical line. On the right the distributions are shown after applying smearing with the resolution function and adding background.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 5
    Figure 5

    Distribution of the FWHM obtained for simulated experiments generated from the result of the Flatté model and fitted with the Breit-Wigner model (filled histogram). Both models account for the experimental resolution. The dashed red line shows the FWHM of the Flatté lineshape, while the solid blue line indicates the value of the Breit-Wigner width observed in the data.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 6
    Figure 6

    The phase of the Flatté amplitude obtained from the fit to the data with m0=3864.5MeV on sheets I (for ImE>0) and II (for ImE<0) of the complex energy plane. The pole singularity is visible at EII=(0.060.13i)MeV. The branch cut is highlighted with the black line. The trajectory of the pole taken when the couplings to all but the DD¯* channel are scaled down to zero is indicated in red.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 7
    Figure 7

    The phase of the Flatté amplitude as obtained from the fit with a finite D*0 width of ΓD*0=65.5keV on sheets I (for ImE>ΓD*0/2) and II (for ImE<ΓD*0/2) of the complex energy plane. Since the D¯*0 meson is treated as an unstable particle, the D0 D¯*0 branch cut indicated by the black solid line is located at ImE=ΓD*0/2. The location of the pole is on the physical sheet with respect to the D0 D¯*0 system.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 8
    Figure 8

    Confidence regions for the pole position on sheets II and IV in the complex energy plane. The displayed uncertainties include statistical contributions and the modeling uncertainty. The poles are extracted at a Flatté mass point of m0=3864.5MeV. The shaded areas are the 1, 2 and 3σ confidence regions. The branch cut is shown as the blue line. The location of the branch cut singularity is indicated with a vertical bar at E=0+0i. The best estimates for the pole position is indicated by a cross. The black points indicate the samples from the pseudoexperiments procedure that lie outside the 3σ region.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 9
    Figure 9

    Confidence regions for the pole position on sheet III in the complex energy plane. The displayed uncertainties include statistical contributions and the modeling uncertainty. The poles are extracted at a Flatté mass point of m0=3864.5MeV. The shaded areas are the 1, 2 and 3σ confidence regions. The branch cut is shown as the blue line. The location of the branch cut singularity is indicated with a vertical bar at E=0+0i. The best estimate for the pole positions is indicated by a cross. The confidence region for the pole on sheets II/IV is shown in outline for comparison. The black points indicate the samples from the pseudoexperiments procedure that lie outside the 3σ region.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 10
    Figure 10

    Confidence regions for the pole on sheet II in the complex energy plane. The displayed uncertainties include statistical contributions and the uncertainty from the choice of the Flatté mass parameter m0. Modeling uncertainties are not shown. The shaded areas are the 1, 2 and 3σ confidence regions. The branch cut is shown as the blue line. The location of the branch cut singularity is indicated with a vertical bar at E=0+0i. The black circles indicate the best estimates for the pole position for the different choices of m0.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 11
    Figure 11

    Confidence regions for the pole on sheet II in the complex energy plane, in the case that the mass scale is shifted up by 0.066 MeV, due to systematic uncertainty of the momentum scale. Only the statistical uncertainties are displayed. The shaded areas are the 1, 2 and 3σ confidence regions. The cross indicates the location of the pole found in the default fit, with the nominal momentum scale. The branch cut is shown as the blue line. The location of the branch cut singularity is indicated with a vertical bar at E=0+0i.

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

×

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×