Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

H0=69.8±1.3kms1Mpc1, Ωm0=0.288±0.017, and other constraints from lower-redshift, non-CMB, expansion-rate data

Shulei Cao and Bharat Ratra
Phys. Rev. D 107, 103521 – Published 17 May 2023

Abstract

We use updated type Ia Pantheon+supernova, baryon acoustic oscillation, and Hubble parameter (now also accounting for correlations) data, as well as new reverberation-measured C iv quasar data, and quasar angular size, H ii starburst galaxy, reverberation-measured Mg ii quasar, and Amati-correlated gamma-ray burst data to constrain cosmological parameters. We show that these datasets result in mutually consistent constraints and jointly use them to constrain cosmological parameters in six different spatially flat and nonflat cosmological models. Our analysis provides summary model-independent determinations of two key cosmological parameters: the Hubble constant, H0=69.8±1.3kms1Mpc1, and the current nonrelativistic matter density parameter, Ωm0=0.288±0.017. Our summary error bars are 2.4 and 2.3 times those obtained using the flat cosmological constant cold dark matter (ΛCDM) model and Planck TT,TE,EE+lowE+lensing cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropy data. Our H0 value is very consistent with that from the local expansion rate based on the tip of the red giant branch and type Ia supernova (SN Ia) data, is 2σ lower than that from the local expansion rate based on Cepheid and SN Ia data, and is 2σ higher than that in the flat ΛCDM model based on Planck TT,TE,EE+lowE+lensing CMB data. Our data compilation shows at most mild evidence for nonflat spatial hypersurfaces, but more significant evidence for dark energy dynamics, 2σ or larger in the spatially flat dynamical dark energy models we study.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
3 More
  • Received 27 February 2023
  • Accepted 2 May 2023

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.103521

© 2023 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Gravitation, Cosmology & Astrophysics

Authors & Affiliations

Shulei Cao* and Bharat Ratra

  • Department of Physics, Kansas State University, 116 Cardwell Hall, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA

  • *shulei@phys.ksu.edu
  • ratra@phys.ksu.edu

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 107, Iss. 10 — 15 May 2023

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    One-dimensional likelihoods and 1σ, 2σ, and 3σ two-dimensional likelihood confidence contours from old H(z) (red) and H(z) (blue) data for six different models. The black dashed zero-acceleration lines in panels (b)–(f), computed for the third cosmological parameter set to the H(z)+ BAO data best-fitting values listed in Table 4 in panels (d) and (f), divides the parameter space into regions associated with currently accelerating (below or below left) and currently decelerating (above or above right) cosmological expansion. The crimson dash-dot lines represent flat hypersurfaces, with closed spatial hypersurfaces either below or to the left. The magenta lines represent wX=1, i.e., flat or nonflat ΛCDM models. The α=0 axes correspond to flat and nonflat ΛCDM models in panels (e) and (f), respectively.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Same as Fig. 1 but for old H(z)+ old BAO (red) and H(z)+ BAO (blue) data.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    Same as Fig. 1 but for SNP+SND (red) and SNP+ (blue) data. The black dashed zero-acceleration lines in panels (b)–(f), computed for the third cosmological parameter set to the H(z)+ BAO data best-fitting values listed in Table 4 in panels (d) and (f), divides the parameter space into regions associated with currently accelerating (below or below left) and currently decelerating (above or above right) cosmological expansion.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4

    Same as Fig. 1 but for SNP+ (gray), H(z)+ BAO (green), and H(z)+BAO+SNP+ (blue) data.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 5
    Figure 5

    Same as Fig. 1 but for old H(z)+ old BAO+SNP+SND (red) and H(z)+BAO+SNP+ (blue) data.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 6
    Figure 6

    Same as Fig. 1 but for QSOAS+HIIG (blue), MgII+CIV (green), A118 (gray), and QSOAS+HIIG+MgII+CIV+A118 (red) data. The black dashed zero-acceleration lines, computed for the third cosmological parameter set to the H(z)+ BAO data best-fitting values listed in Table 4 in panels (d) and (f), divides the parameter space into regions associated with currently accelerating (below left) and currently decelerating (above right) cosmological expansion.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 7
    Figure 7

    Same as Fig. 1 but for QSOAS+HIIG+MgII+CIV+A118 (green), H(z)+BAO+SNP+ (red), and H(z)+BAO+SNP++QSOAS+HIIG+MgII+CIV+A118 (blue) data. The black dashed zero-acceleration lines in panels (b)–(f), computed for the third cosmological parameter set to the H(z)+ BAO data best-fitting values listed in Table 4 in panels (d) and (f), divides the parameter space into regions associated with currently accelerating (below or below left) and currently decelerating (above or above right) cosmological expansion.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 8
    Figure 8

    Same as Fig. 7 but including noncosmological parameters.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 9
    Figure 9

    Same as Fig. 1 but for old H(z)+ old BAO+QSOAS+HIIG+MgII+A118 (red) and H(z)+BAO+SNP++QSOAS+HIIG+MgII+CIV+A118 (blue) data.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 10
    Figure 10

    Same as Fig. 1 but for H(z)+BAO+SNP++QSOAS+MgII+CIV+A118 (blue) and H(z)+BAO+SNP+ (red) data.

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review D

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×