Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
  • Open Access

First constraints on WIMP-nucleon effective field theory couplings in an extended energy region from LUX-ZEPLIN

J. Aalbers et al. (LZ Collaboration)
Phys. Rev. D 109, 092003 – Published 9 May 2024
PDFHTMLExport Citation
Abstract
Authors
Article Text
  • INTRODUCTION
  • DETECTOR, DATA AND SELECTION
  • MODELING
  • RESULTS
  • CONCLUSION
  • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
  • APPENDICES
    • Supplemental Material
    References

    Abstract

    Following the first science results of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) experiment, a dual-phase xenon time projection chamber operating from the Sanford Underground Research Facility in Lead, South Dakota, USA, we report the initial limits on a model-independent nonrelativistic effective field theory describing the complete set of possible interactions of a weakly interacting massive particle (WIMP) with a nucleon. These results utilize the same 5.5 t fiducial mass and 60 live days of exposure collected for the LZ spin-independent and spin-dependent analyses while extending the upper limit of the energy region of interest by a factor of 7.5 to 270 keV. No significant excess in this high energy region is observed. Using a profile-likelihood ratio analysis, we report 90% confidence level exclusion limits on the coupling of each individual nonrelativistic WIMP-nucleon operator for both elastic and inelastic interactions in the isoscalar and isovector bases.

    • Figure
    • Figure
    • Figure
    • Figure
    • Figure
    • Figure
    • Figure
    4 More
    • Received 5 December 2023
    • Accepted 26 March 2024

    DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.092003

    Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

    Published by the American Physical Society

    Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

    1. Research Areas
    Particle dark matter
    1. Physical Systems
    Weakly interacting massive particles
    1. Techniques
    Dark matter detectorsTime-projection chambers
    Particles & Fields

    Authors & Affiliations

    Click to Expand

    Article Text

    Click to Expand

    Supplemental Material

    Click to Expand

    References

    Click to Expand
    Issue

    Vol. 109, Iss. 9 — 1 May 2024

    Reuse & Permissions
    Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

    Authorization Required

    Log In
    Other Options
    ×

    Images

    • Figure 1
      Figure 1

      Differential recoil spectra for the fourteen non-relativistic NREFT WIMP-nucleon operators for a 1000  GeV/c2 WIMP in both the isoscalar (solid line) and the isovector (dashed line) bases. The operators are categorized by their nuclear responses (as defined in Ref. [14]); M-only (top left), Σ′-only (top center), Σ′′-only (top right), M and Δ (bottom left), Σ′ and Φ′′ (bottom center) and all other responses (bottom right). The spectra were generated with a coupling strength of unity, excluding the possibility of interference terms. The shaded gray regions indicate the energies at which the detection efficiency is below 50% after all data analysis cuts have been applied (see Fig. 4).

      Reuse & Permissions
    • Figure 2
      Figure 2

      Calibration events in {log10(S1c),log10(S2c)} space from tritium (light blue), D-D neutrons (orange), and Pb212 (green) in and above the ROI. The mean ER and NR responses from NEST for flat energy spectra are shown in dark blue and red, respectively; the dashed lines indicate the 10%–90% percentiles of the expected response. Additionally, the region highlighted in pink denotes the shift in the 10%–90% percentiles when considering the ±1σ uncertainty in the NEST mean NR response beyond the D-D endpoint used for this study. Gray contours are lines of constant reconstructed energy, labeled for both ER and NR interactions. The gray dashed horizontal line denotes the upper log10(S2c) bound used in this analysis, however, the calibration events in this region were used to constrain the ER response model.

      Reuse & Permissions
    • Figure 3
      Figure 3

      Data in reconstructed r2 and z after all analysis cuts. Black (gray) points show the data inside (outside) the fiducial volume after all cuts and vetoes have been applied. Red crosses and blue circles show events vetoed by a prompt Skin and OD signal, respectively. Solid green diamonds indicate the events removed by the γ-X BDT cut after all other cuts have been applied. Hollow diamonds indicate events outside the FV classified as γ-X. The solid line shows the fiducial volume definition, and the dashed line shows the extent of the active TPC.

      Reuse & Permissions
    • Figure 4
      Figure 4

      Signal efficiency as a function of the NR energy from the trigger (blue), the threefold coincidence and 3 phd threshold on S1c (orange), the single-scatter (SS) reconstruction and analysis cuts (green), and the search ROI in S1c and S2c (black). The low energy behavior is shown in the inset, where the dotted line at 5.5  keVnr indicates the nuclear recoil energy at which the efficiencies equal 50%. The uncertainty on the detection efficiency (gray region) was assessed with H3, Rn220, and AmLi calibration data.

      Reuse & Permissions
    • Figure 5
      Figure 5

      Example {log10(S1c),log10(S2c)} distributions for a 1000  GeV/c2 WIMP-nucleon isoscalar interaction for the momentum-independent operator O1 (top), and momentum-dependent operators O6 (middle) and O13 (bottom). Red and blue lines denote the flat ER and NR response regions as described in Fig. 2. Each pane shows the distribution for 100,000 WIMP nuclear recoils.

      Reuse & Permissions
    • Figure 6
      Figure 6

      The final high-energy WIMP-search data after all cuts in {log10(S1c),log10(S2c)} space. The contours that enclose 1σ (dark) and 2.5σ (light) regions represent the following models: the shaded red region indicates the detector neutrons, the shaded orange region indicate the detector ERs, the blue region is the combined representation of all other ER models (Pb214, Pb212, Kr85, Ar37, I125, Xe124, Xe127, Xe136, and ν ER) and the black dashed lines show a 1000  GeV/c2 O6 isoscalar signal model. The solid red line corresponds to the NR median, while the red dotted lines represent the 10–90% percentiles of the expected response. The model contours are produced with a linear scale for S1c prior to being cast into log and take into account all the efficiencies used in the analysis. Contours of constant recoil energy have been included as thin gray lines. Grayed regions at the left and top of the plot indicate parameter space outside the energy ROI.

      Reuse & Permissions
    • Figure 7
      Figure 7

      The 90% confidence limit (black lines) of the dimensionless isoscalar WIMP-nucleon couplings for each of the fourteen NREFT elastic interactions. The black dotted lines show the medians of the sensitivity projection, and the green and yellow bands correspond to the 1σ and 2σ sensitivity bands, respectively. Also shown are the NREFT results from the XENON100 experiment (magenta) and the PandaX-II experiment (blue). The latter upper limits are cast from their starting points of L5 (reduces to O1) and L15 (reduces to O4). The LUX limits (brown points), are from their δ=0  keV inelastic result. The LZ signal model uses nuclear density matrices that have been updated since the XENON100 and LUX analyses, leading to reduced rates for some operators such as O13, where the LUX result appears stronger than the LZ result.

      Reuse & Permissions
    • Figure 8
      Figure 8

      The 90% confidence limit (black lines) of the dimensionless isovector WIMP-nucleon couplings for each of the 14 NREFT elastic interactions. The black dotted lines show the medians of the sensitivity projection, and the green and yellow bands correspond to the 1σ and 2σ sensitivity bands, respectively. Also shown are the SI and SD results of the PandaX-II experiment (blue). The latter upper limits are cast from their L5 (reduces to O1) and their L15 (reduces to O4).

      Reuse & Permissions
    • Figure 9
      Figure 9

      The 90% confidence limit (solid lines) of the dimensionless isoscalar WIMP-nucleon couplings for each of the fourteen NREFT interactions. The dotted lines show the medians of the sensitivity projection and the shaded bands correspond to the 1σ sensitivity band. The upper limit is evaluated for WIMP masses of 400  GeV/c2, 1000  GeV/c2, and 4000  GeV/c2, for values of the mass splitting δ of 0 keV (purple), 50 keV (blue), 100 keV (green), 150 keV (yellow), 200 keV (orange), and 250 keV (red). Circular data points represent the 1000  GeV/c2 inelastic limits from the LUX WS2014-16 NREFT search [9].

      Reuse & Permissions
    • Figure 10
      Figure 10

      The 90% confidence limit (solid lines) of the dimensionless isovector WIMP-nucleon couplings for each of the fourteen NREFT interactions. The dotted lines show the medians of the sensitivity projection and the shaded bands correspond to the 1σ sensitivity band. The upper limit is evaluated for WIMP masses of 400  GeV/c2, 1000  GeV/c2, and 4000  GeV/c2, for values of the mass splitting δ of 0 keV (purple), 50 keV (blue), 100 keV (green), 150 keV (yellow), 200 keV (orange), and 250 keV (red).

      Reuse & Permissions
    • Figure 11
      Figure 11

      The 90% confidence limit of the dimensionless isoscalar NREFT O1 WIMP-nucleon couplings from various LXe direct detection experiments. Solid lines represent the limit on O1 isoscalar from NREFT analyses: LZ—this work (black), PandaX-II 2019 (blue), XENON100 (magenta), and LUX WS2014-16 (brown point). Dotted lines represent recast SI limits; LZ—this work (black dotted), PandaX-4T 2021 (blue dotted), XENONnT (yellow dotted), and LUX full exposure (brown dotted). The normalizations applied for the recast limits are given in Table 3.

      Reuse & Permissions
    ×

    Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review D

    Reuse & Permissions

    It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

    ×

    Log In

    Cancel
    ×

    Search

    Article Lookup

    Paste a citation or DOI
    Enter a citation
    ×