Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Supersymmetric SO(10)-inspired GUTs with sliding scales

Carolina Arbeláez, Renato M. Fonseca, Jorge C. Romão, and Martin Hirsch
Phys. Rev. D 87, 075010 – Published 12 April 2013

Abstract

We construct lists of supersymmetric models with extended gauge groups at intermediate steps, all of which are inspired by SO(10) unification. We consider three different kinds of setups: (i) the model has exactly one additional intermediate scale with a left-right (LR) symmetric group; (ii) SO(10) is broken to the LR group via an intermediate Pati-Salam scale; and (iii) the LR group is broken into SU(3)c×SU(2)L×U(1)R×U(1)BL, before breaking to the standard model (SM) group. We use sets of conditions, which we call the “sliding mechanism,” which yield unification with the extended gauge group(s) allowed at arbitrary intermediate energy scales. All models thus can have new gauge bosons within the reach of the LHC, in principle. We apply additional conditions, such as perturbative unification, renormalizability and anomaly cancellation and find that, despite these requirements, for the ansatz (i) with only one additional scale still around 50 different variants exist that can have a LR symmetry below 10 TeV. For the more complicated schemes (ii) and (iii) literally thousands of possible variants exist, and for scheme (ii) we have also found variants with very low Pati-Salam scales. We also discuss possible experimental tests of the models from measurements of supersymmetry masses. Assuming mSugra boundary conditions we calculate certain combinations of soft terms, called “invariants,” for the different classes of models. Values for all the invariants can be classified into a small number of sets, which contain information about the class of models and, in principle, the scale of beyond-minimal supersymmetric extension of the Standard Model physics, even in case the extended gauge group is broken at an energy beyond the reach of the LHC.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
4 More
  • Received 31 January 2013

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.87.075010

© 2013 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Carolina Arbeláez*, Renato M. Fonseca, and Jorge C. Romão

  • Departamento de Física and CFTP, Technical University of Lisbon, Avenida Rovisco Pais 1, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal

Martin Hirsch§

  • AHEP Group, Instituto de Física Corpuscular-C.S.I.C./Universitat de València Edificio de Institutos de Paterna, Apartado 22085, E-46071 València, Spain

  • *Carolina.Arbelaez@ist.utl.pt
  • renato.fonseca@ist.utl.pt
  • jorge.romao@ist.utl.pt
  • §mahirsch@ific.uv.es

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 87, Iss. 7 — 1 April 2013

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1
    Maximum value of Δb allowed by perturbativity as function of the scale mR in GeV. The three different lines have been calculated for three different values for the unified coupling αG1, namely αG1=0, 3, 10. A LR scale below 10 TeV (1 TeV) requires Max(Δb3)5.7 (5.2) if the extreme value of αG1=0 is chosen and Max(Δb3)5.1 (4.7) for αG1=3.Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2
    Gauge coupling unification in LR models for mR=104GeV. The left panel is for (Δb3LR,Δb2LR,ΔbRLR,ΔbBLLR)=(0,0,1,15/2) and the right panel is for (4, 4, 10, 4).Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3
    Maximum value of Δb4PSΔb3LR allowed by perturbativity as function of the scale mPS in GeV. The different lines have been calculated for six different values of Δb3LR. The plot assumes that mR=1TeV. The line near the bottom corresponds to Δb3LR=7.Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4
    The number of possible variants in model class II, assuming mR is of order mR1TeV as a function of mPS. Up to mPS=1015GeV the list is exhaustive. For larger values of mPS we have only scanned a finite (though large) set of possible variants.Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 5
    Figure 5
    Gauge coupling unification for PS models with mR=103GeV. In the plot to the left (Δb3LR,ΔbLLR,ΔbRLR,ΔbBLLR,Δb4PS,ΔbLPS,ΔbRPS)=(3,5,10,3/2,8,5,17), while the plot to the right corresponds to Δbs=(3,4,12,6,8,4,12).Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 6
    Figure 6
    Gauge coupling unification in models with an U(1)R×U(1)BL intermediate scale, for mR=103GeV. Left: (Δb3LR,ΔbLLR,ΔbRLR,ΔbBLLR,Δb3BL,ΔbLBL,ΔγRR,ΔγXR,ΔγXX)=(0,1,3,3,0,0,1/2,3/8,3/4). Right: (2,2,4,8,2,2,1/2,3/8,11/4). The line, which appears close to zero in the U(1)R×U(1)BL regime, is the running of the off-diagonal element of the matrix A1; i.e., it measures the size of the U(1) mixing in the model.Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 7
    Figure 7
    mR dependence of the invariants in model class I. The examples of ΔbiLR=(Δb3LR,bLLR,ΔbRLR,ΔbBLLR) for these sets are as follows. Set 1: (2,2,9,1/2). Set 2: (1, 1, 7, 1). Set 10: (4,4,3,29/2). Set 14: (0, 0, 2, 6). For a discussion see text.Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 8
    Figure 8
    The mR dependence of the invariants in model class II. The examples shown correspond to the choices of Δb=(Δb3LR,ΔbLLR,ΔbRLR,ΔbBLLR,Δb4PS,ΔbLPS,ΔbRPS). Set 3: (0,1,10,3/2,14,9,13). Set 6: (0,0,1,9/2,63,60,114). Set 7: (0,3,12,3/2,6,3,15). Set 8: (0,0,9,3/2,11,8,12). Set 16: (0,0,7,3/2,11,8,10).Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 9
    Figure 9
    The mBL dependence of the invariants in class III. To the left the example chooses (Δb3LR,ΔbLLR,ΔbRLR,ΔbBLLR,Δb3BL,ΔbLBL,ΔγRR,ΔγXR,ΔγXX)=(0,1,3,3,0,0,1/2,3/8,3/4). To the right: (2,2,4,8,2,2,1/2,3/8,11/4).Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 10
    Figure 10
    Parametric (LE,QE) plot for the different variants (see text). The thicker lines labeled with I, II, III and IV indicate the results for the four prototype models presented in Ref. 20.Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 11
    Figure 11
    Parametric (LE,QE) plots for different PS variants showing the effect of the PS scale.Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review D

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×