Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
  • Rapid Communication

Independent measurement of the neutrino mixing angle θ13 via neutron capture on hydrogen at Daya Bay

F. P. An et al. (Daya Bay Collaboration)
Phys. Rev. D 90, 071101(R) – Published 3 October 2014

Abstract

A new measurement of the θ13 mixing angle has been obtained at the Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment via the detection of inverse beta decays tagged by neutron capture on hydrogen. The antineutrino events for hydrogen capture are distinct from those for gadolinium capture with largely different systematic uncertainties, allowing a determination independent of the gadolinium-capture result and an improvement on the precision of the θ13 measurement. With a 217-day antineutrino data set obtained with six antineutrino detectors and from six 2.9  GWth reactors, the rate deficit observed at the far hall is interpreted as sin22θ13=0.083±0.018 in the three-flavor oscillation model. When combined with the gadolinium-capture result from Daya Bay, we obtain sin22θ13=0.089±0.008 as the final result for the six-antineutrino-detector configuration of the Daya Bay experiment.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 24 June 2014

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.071101

© 2014 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Click to Expand

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 90, Iss. 7 — 1 October 2014

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    (a) The prompt vs delayed energy of double-coincidence events with a maximum 50 cm vertex separation for all far-hall ADs, (b) the accidental background sample events, and (c) the delayed energy distribution after subtracting the accidentally coincident background for the far hall (black) and the near halls (red), where the total near-site spectrum was normalized to the area of the far-site spectrum.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Distributions of the distance between the prompt and the delayed vertices after the accidental background was subtracted for the near halls (blue) and the far hall (red). The inset plot shows the distance distributions for both the near-hall DC events (blue) and the expected accidental background sample (black).

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    Distribution of the delayed minus prompt time of the EH3 data sample. The blue histogram shows coincidences after all cuts except on the time difference. The black curve shows the predicted distribution for accidental coincidences.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4

    The detected energy spectrum of the prompt events of the far-hall ADs (blue) and near-hall ADs (open circle) weighted according to baseline. The far-to-near ratio (solid dot) with the best-fit θ13 value is shown in the lower plot. In the inset is the ratio of the measured to the predicted rates in each AD vs baseline, in which the AD4 (AD6) baseline was shifted relative to that of AD5 by 30 (30)m.

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review D

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×