Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Mixing asymmetries in B meson systems, the D0 like-sign dimuon asymmetry, and generic new physics

F. J. Botella, G. C. Branco, M. Nebot, and A. Sánchez
Phys. Rev. D 91, 035013 – Published 12 February 2015

Abstract

The measurement of a large like-sign dimuon asymmetry ASLb by the D0 experiment at the Tevatron departs noticeably from Standard Model (SM) expectations and it may be interpreted as a hint of physics beyond the Standard Model contributing to ΔB0 transitions. In this work we analyze how the natural suppression of ASLb in the SM can be circumvented by new physics. We consider generic Standard Model extensions where the charged current mixing matrix is enlarged with respect to the usual 3×3 unitary Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix, and show how, within this framework, a significant enhancement over Standard Model expectations for ASLb is easily reachable through enhancements of the semileptonic asymmetries ASLd and ASLs of both Bd0B¯d0 and Bs0B¯s0 systems. Despite being insufficient to reproduce the D0 measurement, such deviations from SM expectations may be probed by the LHCb experiment.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
3 More
  • Received 28 October 2014

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.035013

© 2015 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

F. J. Botella1,*, G. C. Branco2,†, M. Nebot2,‡, and A. Sánchez1,§

  • 1Departament de Física Teòrica and IFIC, Universitat de València-CSIC, E-46100 Burjassot, Spain
  • 2Centro de Física Teórica de Partículas and Departamento de Física Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Rovisco Pais, P-1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal

  • *fbotella@uv.es
  • gbranco@tecnico.ulisboa.pt
  • nebot@cftp.ist.utl.pt
  • §asanchez@ific.uv.es

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 91, Iss. 3 — 1 February 2015

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Δχ2 profile of the semileptonic asymmetries ASLd and ASLs; the blue line corresponds to the NP scenario—Eq. (22)—the red dashed line corresponds to the SM case. Notice that for ASLs the SM range is too narrow to be resolved on this scale. (a) Δχ2 vs ASLd. (b) Δχ2 vs ASLs.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Δχ2 profiles of ASLq vs 2ϕq; 68%, 95% and 99% C.L. regions are shown. (a) ASLd vs 2ϕd. (b) ASLs vs 2ϕs.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    Δχ2 profile of ASLb; the blue line corresponds to the NP scenario; the red dashed line corresponds to the SM case. The last D0 measurements give ASLb=(4.96±1.69)×103 [1].

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4

    Δχ2 profile of the combinations of semileptonic asymmetries ASLs±ASLd; the blue lines correspond to the NP scenario—Eq. (22)—the red dashed lines correspond to the SM case. (a) Δχ2 vs ASLs+ASLd. (b) Δχ2 vs ASLsASLd.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 5
    Figure 5

    Δχ2 68%, 95% and 99% C.L. regions. Blue regions correspond to the NP scenario; red regions correspond to the SM case. Notice that with the scales in Fig. 5, the SM region is barely a point. (a) ASLd vs |Vub|. (b) ASLs vs AJ/ΨΦ. (c) ASLb vs |Vub|. (d) ASLb vs AJ/ΨΦ.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 6
    Figure 6

    Δχ2 profiles of semileptonic asymmetries ASLq; the blue lines correspond to the 4×4 unitary NP scenario—Eqs. (33) and (34)—the red dotted lines correspond to the 3×3 unitary NP scenario of Sec. 3; the red dashed lines correspond to the SM case. The last D0 measurement gives ASLb=(4.96±1.69)×103 [1]. (a) Δχ2 vs ASLd. (b) Δχ2 vs ASLs. (c) Δχ2 vs ASLb.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 7
    Figure 7

    Δχ2 68%, 95% and 99% C.L. regions. Blue regions correspond to the 4×4 unitary NP scenario; red regions correspond to the SM case. (a) ASLd vs |Vub|. (b) ASLs vs AJ/ΨΦ. (c) ASLb vs |Vub|. (d) ASLb vs AJ/ΨΦ.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 8
    Figure 8

    Δχ2 profiles of the deviations from 3×3 unitarity in |Vtb| and in the first and second rows of the mixing matrix. (a) Δχ2 vs |Vtb|. (b) Δχ2 vs 1|Vud|2|Vus|2|Vub|2. (c) Δχ2 vs 1|Vcd|2|Vcs|2|Vcb|2.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 9
    Figure 9

    bd unitarity and M12(d) in the SM and beyond. (a) bd unitarity triangle in the SM. (b) M12(d) in the SM. (c) bd unitarity triangle with NP in mixings. (d) M12(d) with NP. (e) bd unitarity quadrangle. (f) M12(d) beyond 3×3 unitarity.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 10
    Figure 10

    bs unitarity and M12(s) in the SM and beyond. (a) bs unitarity triangle in the SM. (b) bs unitarity triangle with NP in mixings. (c) bs unitarity quadrangle.

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review D

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×