Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
  • Open Access

Cosmogenic neutron production at Daya Bay

F. P. An et al. (The Daya Bay Collaboration)
Phys. Rev. D 97, 052009 – Published 26 March 2018

Abstract

Neutrons produced by cosmic ray muons are an important background for underground experiments studying neutrino oscillations, neutrinoless double beta decay, dark matter, and other rare-event signals. A measurement of the neutron yield in the three different experimental halls of the Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment at varying depth is reported. The neutron yield in Daya Bay’s liquid scintillator is measured to be Yn=(10.26±0.86)×105, (10.22±0.87)×105, and (17.03±1.22)×105μ1g1cm2 at depths of 250, 265, and 860 meters-water-equivalent. These results are compared to other measurements and the simulated neutron yield in Fluka and Geant4. A global fit including the Daya Bay measurements yields a power law coefficient of 0.77±0.03 for the dependence of the neutron yield on muon energy.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
6 More
  • Received 3 November 2017

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.052009

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Particles & FieldsNuclear Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Click to Expand

Article Text

Click to Expand

References

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 97, Iss. 5 — 1 March 2018

Reuse & Permissions
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    A map of the layout of the Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment, including six reactor cores (Daya Bay, Ling Ao I, and Ling Ao II cores) and three experimental halls (two near and one far). The antineutrino detectors (ADs) are located in the underground experimental halls, with two ADs at the Daya Bay Near Hall (EH1), two at the Ling Ao Near Hall (EH2), and four at the Far Hall (EH3).

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Left: Diagram of near site detectors. Right: Diagram of an AD.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    Photograph of EH1 showing the RPCs and telescope RPC system in position over the water pool. The main RPCs are at floor level, and the two telescope RPCs extend from the wall on the left and right of the photograph.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4

    Simulated trajectories of muons that reach the underground halls. By definition, zenith is the angle from the vertical and azimuth is the horizontal compass angle from true North. (A zenith angle of 0° represents a downward-going muon, and an azimuthal angle of 0° corresponds to a muon coming from the northern direction.) Differences in angular distributions at each hall are due to the mountain profile.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 5
    Figure 5

    Simulated energy spectra of muons that reach the underground halls. The differences between EH1 and EH2 are too small to be visible at this scale.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 6
    Figure 6

    Distribution of energy deposited in an AD by AD-tagged muons that fall within a [2μs, 2μs] time window of a water-pool tagged muon in data and MC (EH1). For data, the deposited energy is reconstructed from PMT hits. For MC, the simulated deposited energy is shown.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 7
    Figure 7

    Distribution of muon path length through the GdLS from simulation (EH1). The small peak at 6.5cm is due to the geometry of the calibration tubes in the AD. The large peak around 300 cm corresponds to the dimensions of the of the GdLS region.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 8
    Figure 8

    Zenith angle (θ) distribution (top) and azimuthal (ϕ) distribution (bottom) from the nominal muon simulation (red line) and data (black points) for RTC events in EH1. The corresponding distributions for EH2 and EH3 show similar agreement between the data and the nominal muon simulation.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 9
    Figure 9

    Comparison of neutron multiplicity in data and MC in EH1. For the MC, true neutron captures on Gd are selected between 10 and 200μs after an AD-tagged muon. For the data, neutron captures are selected with a 6–12 MeV energy range between 10 and 200μs after an AD-tagged muon. To suppress random background in the data, no other AD-tagged muon is allowed in a [0.5,0.5]  ms window. This distribution has been corrected for readout window efficiency and the effect of blocked triggers.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 10
    Figure 10

    Time between the muon and delayed events (neutron capture time) for data and MC in EH1.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 11
    Figure 11

    Energy of the delayed events (neutron capture energy) for data and MC in EH1.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 12
    Figure 12

    Semi-log distribution of the perpendicular distance between neutron capture position and the RTC event muon track for EH1 data. The best linear fit of the logarithm of the number of counts as a function of the distance for the data is shown, in addition to the lines drawn with the upper and lower limit slopes used to determine the neutron energy scaling in the MC.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 13
    Figure 13

    Neutron yield vs. average muon energy from the three Daya Bay experimental halls compared to other experiments. The points for Daya Bay EH1 and EH2, which differ in energy by less than 1 GeV, are shown in the inset. The predicted yields at Daya Bay from Geant4 and Fluka are also shown. Experimental data is shown from Hertenberger [6], Boehm [8], Aberdeen Tunnel [10], KamLAND [4], LVD [2] with corrections from [35], and Borexino [3]. The solid line shows the power-law fit to the global data set including Daya Bay. The dashed line and dash-dotted lines show Fluka-based predictions for the dependence of the neutron yield on muon energy from Wang et al. [32] and Kudryavtsey et al. [33].

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

×

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×