Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Maximal Refraction and Superluminal Propagation in a Gaseous Nanolayer

J. Keaveney, I. G. Hughes, A. Sargsyan, D. Sarkisyan, and C. S. Adams
Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 233001 – Published 3 December 2012

Abstract

We present an experimental measurement of the refractive index of high density Rb vapor in a gaseous atomic nanolayer. We use heterodyne interferometry to measure the relative phase shift between two copropagating laser beams as a function of the laser detuning and infer a peak index n=1.26±0.02, close to the theoretical maximum of 1.31. The large index has a concomitant large index gradient creating a region with steep anomalous dispersion where a subnanosecond optical pulse is advanced by >100ps over a propagation distance of 390 nm, corresponding to a group index ng=(1.0±0.1)×105, the largest negative group index measured to date.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 22 August 2012

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.233001

© 2012 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

J. Keaveney1, I. G. Hughes1, A. Sargsyan2, D. Sarkisyan2, and C. S. Adams1

  • 1Joint Quantum Centre (JQC) Durham-Newcastle, Department of Physics, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, United Kingdom
  • 2Institute for Physical Research, National Academy of Sciences, Ashtarak-2 0203, Armenia

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 109, Iss. 23 — 7 December 2012

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1
    Experimental setup and example data. (a) Photograph of experimental nanocell used in the experiment. The cell has a wedge profile (shown schematically) resulting in a tunable vapor thickness. (b) Schematic of experimental setup. For details see main text. AOM—acousto-optic modulator, SM—single mode fiber, BS—5050 beam splitter, FPD1/2—fast photodiodes. (c) Beat frequency between shifted and unshifted beams for each detector, from which a phase difference is measured. As the laser frequency is scanned, we obtain transmission (d) and relative phase shift (e) information, shown here for a vapor thickness =λ/2 and T=250°C across the D2 resonance, fitted to theory (solid black lines). Panel (f) shows the inferred refractive indices for the shifted (dashed) and unshifted (solid) beams—the solid line in (e) is the difference of these two curves. Zero on the detuning axis represents the weighted line center of the D2 line.Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2
    (a) Calculated refractive index as a function of temperature and detuning for the Rb D2 resonance. Solid (dashed) contour lines denote positive (negative) values. The maximum predicted index is 1.31. The density-dependent redshift can clearly be seen, and has a significant effect on the position of the maximum index. The dotted line shows the positions of the unshifted Doppler-broadened lines. (b, c) Experimental data for a thickness =250nm and T=330°C (N=5×1016cm3). Close to resonance, the large optical depth reduces signal to the point where accurate phase information is lost. Despite this, the fit is reasonable and we infer a maximum index n=1.26±0.02.Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3
    (a) Calculated group index as a function of temperature and detuning. The dashed black line represents the carrier detuning for the superluminal pulse. (b,c) Superluminal propagation of a 800 ps pulse through a vapor thickness =λ/2 and temperature T=255°C. Solid lines are experiment, dashed black lines are theory with an 800 ps FWHM Gaussian input pulse. The dashed green line is the theory without dipole-dipole interactions. Off resonance (Δc=13GHz, thin red line) there is no interaction at this temperature and the pulse propagates through the vapor as it would through vacuum. On resonance, (Δc=1.2GHz, thick blue line), the pulse is attenuated and arrives (0.13±0.01)ns earlier than the off-resonance reference pulse, corresponding to a group index ng=(1.0±0.1)×105. (d) Total integrated counts for both signals verifies preservation of causality—the probability of detecting a photon is always higher in the reference pulse.Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review Letters

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×