Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
  • Editors' Suggestion

Observation of the Leggett-Rice Effect in a Unitary Fermi Gas

S. Trotzky, S. Beattie, C. Luciuk, S. Smale, A. B. Bardon, T. Enss, E. Taylor, S. Zhang, and J. H. Thywissen
Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 015301 – Published 7 January 2015
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

We observe that the diffusive spin current in a strongly interacting degenerate Fermi gas of K40 precesses about the local magnetization. As predicted by Leggett and Rice, precession is observed both in the Ramsey phase of a spin-echo sequence, and in the nonlinearity of the magnetization decay. At unitarity, we measure a Leggett-Rice parameter γ=1.08(9) and a bare transverse spin diffusivity D0=2.3(4)/m for a normal-state gas initialized with full polarization and at one-fifth of the Fermi temperature, where m is the atomic mass. One might expect γ=0 at unitarity, where two-body scattering is purely dissipative. We observe γ0 as temperature is increased towards the Fermi temperature, consistent with calculations that show the degenerate Fermi sea restores a nonzero γ. Tuning the scattering length a, we find that a sign change in γ occurs in the range 0<(kFa)11.3, where kF is the Fermi momentum. We discuss how γ reveals the effective interaction strength of the gas, such that the sign change in γ indicates a switching of branch between a repulsive and an attractive Fermi gas.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 5 November 2014

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.015301

© 2015 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

S. Trotzky1, S. Beattie1, C. Luciuk1, S. Smale1, A. B. Bardon1, T. Enss2, E. Taylor3, S. Zhang4, and J. H. Thywissen1,5

  • 1Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A7, Canada
  • 2Institut für Theoretische Physik, Universität Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
  • 3Department of Physics and Astronomy, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4M1, Canada
  • 4Department of Physics, Center of Theoretical and Computational Physics, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
  • 5Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1Z8, Canada

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 114, Iss. 1 — 9 January 2015

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    The Leggett-Rice effect. (a) In a transverse spin spiral along xj, the gradient jMM drives a spin current JjM, as described by Eq. (1). For γ0, Jj is rotated around M by arctan(γ) compared to (Jj)γ=0. In a spin-echo experiment, this causes both a slower decay of amplitude, A=|Mx+iMy| shown in (b), as well as an accumulated phase, ϕ=arg(iMxMy) shown in (c). The case of θ=5π/6 and full initial polarization is plotted. Dashed lines in (b) and (c) show γ=0, and gray lines show steps of 0.2 up to γ=±1.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    (a) Amplitude A and phase ϕ (inset) of the xy magnetization measured at unitarity for (T/TF)i0.2 and with Mz=0.00(5) (black circles), Mz=0.74(2) (blue), and Mz=0.54(3) (red). All data are taken at a spin-echo time. Error bars represent uncertainties from the fit to a full interferometric fringe. (b) Plot of ϕ(te) versus Mzln[A(te)/A0] for the two cases where Mz0. The solid line is a linear fit to both data sets that is used to extract γ. Error bars represent combined uncertainties from fit and extrapolation. The solid lines in (a) represent fits with Eq. (3) using the value of γ obtained by the analysis presented in (b).

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    Spin transport at unitarity. (a) The measured LR parameter γ, (b) diffusivity D0, and (c) the ratio λ0=γ/(2mD0) are shown versus the initial reduced temperature (T/TF)i. Solid points are each from a phase-sensitive measurement as shown in Fig. 2. Horizontal and vertical error bars represent statistical and fit uncertainties. For these data, N ranges from 50(5)×103 at low temperature to 18(4)×103 at high temperature. Open circles are results from a fit of Eq. (3) to θπ/2 data such as the black circles in Fig. 2, and also to data from Ref. [3]. Here, we fix Mz and vary γ (chosen a posteriori to be non-negative) and D0. Although the two methods provide similar values on average, the phase-sensitive measurements provide reduced scatter for γ0.5, and are sensitive to the sign of γ. Solid lines show a kinetic theory calculation in the limit of large imbalance, and using the local reduced temperature at peak density [17].

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4

    Effect of interaction strength on spin transport. (a) LR parameter γ, (b) D0, and (c) λ0 as a function of (kFa)1. The error bars represent fit uncertainties. For these data, (T/TF)i=0.18(4) and N=40(10)×103, where uncertainty is due to number variation between runs. In the range 0<(kFa)11.3 (indicated in gray) both free atoms and Feshbach dimers are present, as discussed in the text and in Fig. 5. Solid lines show a kinetic theory calculation [17] at (T/TF)i=0.20; the dotted line in (c) shows the weakly interacting limit λ0=[π/(2kFa)1]1 for a balanced T=0 gas [16]. The inset to (c) shows λ01, and includes a calculation using the momentum averaged upper branch T matrix (solid line) as well as λ01=(4εF/3n)T1(0,0). The sign change of λ0 at 0.4(kFa)11 is a robust feature of theory, and is consistent with our data.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 5
    Figure 5

    Presence of dimers above the Feshbach resonance. At the indicated initial (kFa)1, a superposition is created with θ=π/2 and held for 3 ms. The field is then swept to 200.0 G in 5 ms, which magnetoassociates some lower-branch pairs into dimers with a binding energy of h×200  kHz. Dimers are identified with their rf dissociation spectrum, using an 80μs pulse near the 46.85 MHz spin-flip resonance from the |+z state to a previously unoccupied Zeeman state [42]. Each plot shows the transfer rate versus rf frequency. For traces (a), (b), and (c), there is a clearly identified molecular feature above 47.0 MHz (spectral weight shaded in orange). However for traces (d), (e), and (f), the spectral weight above 47.0 MHz is insensitive to field, and consistent with the noise of the measurement.

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review Letters

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×