Analogy Between the ``Hidden Order'' and the Orbital Antiferromagnetism in ${\mathrm{URu}}_{2\ensuremath{-}x}{\mathrm{Fe}}_{x}{\mathrm{Si}}_{2}$

Analogy Between the “Hidden Order” and the Orbital Antiferromagnetism in ${URu}_{2 - x} {Fe}_{x} {Si}_{2}$

H.-H. Kung, S. Ran, N. Kanchanavatee, V. Krapivin, A. Lee, J. A. Mydosh, K. Haule, M. B. Maple, and G. Blumberg

Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 227601 – Published 22 November 2016

Abstract

We study ${URu}_{2 - x} {Fe}_{x} {Si}_{2}$ , in which two types of staggered phases compete at low temperature as the iron concentration $x$ is varied: the nonmagnetic “hidden order” (HO) phase below the critical concentration $x_{c}$ , and unconventional antiferromagnetic (AFM) phase above $x_{c}$ . By using polarization resolved Raman spectroscopy, we detect a collective mode of pseudovectorlike $A_{2 g}$ symmetry whose energy continuously evolves with increasing $x$ ; it monotonically decreases in the HO phase until it vanishes at $x = x_{c}$ , and then reappears with increasing energy in the AFM phase. The mode’s evolution provides direct evidence for a unified order parameter for both nonmagnetic and magnetic phases arising from the orbital degrees-of-freedom of the uranium- $5 f$ electrons.

Received 29 August 2016

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.227601

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Orbital order Order parameters Phase diagrams

Heavy-fermion systems

Liquid helium cooling Raman spectroscopy Symmetries

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Authors & Affiliations

H.-H. Kung^1,*, S. Ran^2,3, N. Kanchanavatee^2,3, V. Krapivin¹, A. Lee¹, J. A. Mydosh⁴, K. Haule¹, M. B. Maple^2,3, and G. Blumberg^1,5,†

¹Department of Physics & Astronomy, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA
²Department of Physics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA
³Center for Advanced Nanoscience, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA
⁴Kamerlingh Onnes Laboratory, Leiden University, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands
⁵National Institute of Chemical Physics and Biophysics, 12618 Tallinn, Estonia

^*hk458@physics.rutgers.edu
^†girsh@physics.rutgers.edu

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Issue

Vol. 117, Iss. 22 — 25 November 2016

Reuse & Permissions

Access Options

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript

Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Images

Figure 1
(a) The upper panel shows the phase diagram of ${URu}_{2} {Si}_{2}$ system, where the black lines show the phase boundaries. The measurements on the iron substituted ${URu}_{2 - x} {Fe}_{x} {Si}_{2}$ crystals from neutron diffraction [22] (blue triangle), electrical resistivity [2] (green square), magnetic susceptibility [2] (purple triangle), and heat capacity [3] (yellow diamond), are overlaid with the neutron diffraction results for ${URu}_{2} {Si}_{2}$ under hydrostatic pressure [4] (open square) to show the similarity between the two tuning parameters. The lower panel shows the dependence of the $A_{2 g}$ collective mode energy on the Fe concentration, $x$ [Fig. 2]. At the critical concentration, $x = 0.1$ , the mode maximum is below the accessible energy cutoff. Therefore, the data point is placed at zero energy, with the error bar reflecting the instrumental cutoff. (b)–(g) Schematics of the Ginzburg-Landau free energy in Eq. (1) at various special points in the phase diagram [solid gray circles in (a)]. $ψ_{HO}$ and $ψ_{AF M}$ are the real and imaginary part of the hexadecapole order parameter, respectively [26, 27].
Reuse & Permissions
Figure 2
Low temperature Raman response in the $A_{2 g}$ symmetry channel, $χ_{A 2 g}^{''} (ω, T)$ [28]. The upper panels show intensity plots, where the intensities are color coded in logarithmic scale. The lower panels show the spectra at about half the transition temperature to emphasize the collective mode, where the error bars represent one standard deviation, and the red solid lines are guides to the eye. The energies of this mode as function of the Fe concentration $x$ are shown in Fig. 1.
Reuse & Permissions
Figure 3
The static Raman susceptibility in the $A_{2 g}$ symmetry channel (open squares) $χ_{A 2 g} (0, T)$ , compared with the magnetic susceptibility with field applied along the $c$ axis [3] (solid line).
Reuse & Permissions
Figure 4
The crystal structure of ${URu}_{2 - x} {Fe}_{x} {Si}_{2}$ in (a) the HO and (b) the LMAF phases. Illustrations capturing the symmetries of the charge distributions of the ground state wave functions are placed at the uranium atomic sites. On the right are illustrations showing the in-plane structures of the wave functions. In the HO phase, the crystal field state with the lowest energy has $A_{2 g}$ symmetry with 8 nodal lines, $| A_{2 g} ⟩$ , which mixes with the first excited state with $A_{1 g}$ symmetry, $| A_{1 g} ⟩$ , to form the local wave functions in the HO phase, $| {HO}^{\pm} ⟩ \approx \cos θ | A_{2 g} ⟩ \pm \sin θ | A_{1 g} ⟩$ . In the LMAF phase, the ordering of the crystal field states switches, and the new wave functions in the LMAF phase are, $| {AF M}^{\pm} ⟩ \approx \cos θ^{'} | A_{1 g} ⟩ \pm i \sin θ^{'} | A_{2 g} ⟩$ . Here, $θ \equiv \arcsin (V / ω_{0})$ and $θ^{'} \equiv \arcsin (V^{'} / ω_{0})$ , respectively. $ω_{0}$ is the splitting between the lowest lying crystal field states in the minimal model. $V$ and $V^{'}$ are the order parameter strength in the HO and LMAF phases, respectively.
Reuse & Permissions

Physical Review Letters

Analogy Between the “Hidden Order” and the Orbital Antiferromagnetism in URu2−xFexSi2

H.-H. Kung, S. Ran, N. Kanchanavatee, V. Krapivin, A. Lee, J. A. Mydosh, K. Haule, M. B. Maple, and G. Blumberg

Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 227601 – Published 22 November 2016

Abstract

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Authors & Affiliations

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

References (Subscription Required)

Issue

Access Options

Authorization Required

Other Options

Download & Share

Images

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Log In

Search

Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation

Analogy Between the “Hidden Order” and the Orbital Antiferromagnetism in ${URu}_{2 - x} {Fe}_{x} {Si}_{2}$