Incommensurate Magnetism Near Quantum Criticality in CeNiAsO

Shan Wu, W. A. Phelan, L. Liu, J. R. Morey, J. A. Tutmaher, J. C. Neuefeind, Ashfia Huq, Matthew B. Stone, M. Feygenson, David W. Tam, Benjamin A. Frandsen, Benjamin Trump, Cheng Wan, S. R. Dunsiger, T. M. McQueen, Y. J. Uemura, and C. L. Broholm

Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 197203 – Published 15 May 2019

Abstract

We report the discovery of incommensurate magnetism near quantum criticality in CeNiAsO through neutron scattering and zero field muon spin rotation. For $T < T_{N 1} = 8.7 (3) K$ , a second order phase transition yields an incommensurate spin density with a wave vector $k = (0.44 (4), 0, 0)$ . For $T < T_{N 2} = 7.6 (3) K$ , we find coplanar commensurate order with a moment of $0.37 (5) μ_{B}$ , reduced to 30% of the saturation moment of the $| \pm \frac{1}{2} ⟩$ Kramers doublet ground state, which we establish through inelastic neutron scattering. Muon spin rotation in ${CeNiAs}_{1 - x} P_{x} O$ shows the commensurate order only exists for $x \leq 0.1$ so we infer the transition at $x_{c} = 0.4 (1)$ is between an incommensurate longitudinal spin density wave and a paramagnetic Fermi liquid.

Received 3 March 2019

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.197203

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Magnetism Quantum criticality Spin density waves

Heavy-fermion systems Strongly correlated systems

Muon spin relaxation & rotation Neutron scattering

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Shan Wu^1,2,*, W. A. Phelan¹, L. Liu³, J. R. Morey¹, J. A. Tutmaher¹, J. C. Neuefeind⁴, Ashfia Huq⁵, Matthew B. Stone⁵, M. Feygenson⁶, David W. Tam⁷, Benjamin A. Frandsen⁸, Benjamin Trump⁹, Cheng Wan¹, S. R. Dunsiger¹⁰, T. M. McQueen^1,11, Y. J. Uemura³, and C. L. Broholm^1,11,5

¹Department of Physics and Astronomy and Institute for Quantum Matter, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA
²Department of Physics, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
³Department of Physics, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA
⁴Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Chemical and Engineering Materials Division, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
⁵Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Neutron Scattering Division, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
⁶Juelich Centre for Neutron Science, Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH, 52425 Juelich, Germany
⁷Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, USA
⁸Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602, USA
⁹NIST Center for Neutron Research, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, USA
¹⁰Department of Physics, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
¹¹Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA

^*shanwu@berkeley.edu

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Issue

Vol. 122, Iss. 19 — 17 May 2019

Reuse & Permissions

Access Options

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript

Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Images

Figure 1
(a) Crystallographic structure of CeNiAsO, and spin structure for $T_{N 2} < T < T_{N 1}$ (b) and $T < T_{N 2}$ (c). Blue stars indicate the single crystallographic muon site. Two equivalent muon sites above and below oxygen become inequivalent within the magnetically ordered state. (d) Temperature-doping phase diagram. Red, blue, and green symbols are from specific heat, $μ SR$ , and neutron data, respectively. Brown dots are from Luo et al. [13]. We assign open (closed) symbols to the higher (lower) $T$ transition. The inset to (d) shows the $q_{z} = 0$ small Fermi surface excluding $4 f$ electrons. The arrow shows the magnetic wave vector, which connects extended areas of the Fermi surface. The dashed lines are guides to the eye.
Reuse & Permissions
Figure 2
Temperature dependence of (a) the longitudinal ( $m_{a}$ ) and (b) the transverse moments ( $m_{c}$ for high $T$ and $m_{b}$ for low $T$ phase). Black dots were extracted from Rietveld fits to neutron diffraction data. The 2 and 8 K data points were averaged over two chopper settings. Blue diamonds were inferred from $μ SR$ fits. The solid lines are guides to the eye. (c) Temperature dependence of the averaged static field. (d) Specific heat $C_{p} / T$ in zero field and for $μ_{0} H = 14 T$ . The upturn in $C_{p} / T$ at 14 T is due to the nuclear spin contributions as indicated by the solid red line.
Reuse & Permissions
Figure 3
(a),(b) Zero-field longitudinal configuration $μ SR$ spectra at $T = 7$ and 0.05 K. The colored lines were calculated for the magnetic structures of Fig. 1. (c),(d) Diffraction patterns collected at $T = 2 K$ and 8 K on NOMAD, after subtracting $T = 15 K$ data as a measure of nuclear diffraction. Red and blue lines correspond to the spin configurations in Fig. 1. The gray dashed lines in (c) mark the nuclear Bragg positions, where thermal expansions give rise to a peak-derivative anomaly. In (d) the horizontal green bar at $Q = 1.1 Å^{- 1}$ indicates the instrument resolution of $0.04 Å^{- 1}$ as detailed in the inset.
Reuse & Permissions
Figure 4
Normalized inelastic spectrum with incident energy $E_{i} = 100 meV$ (black dots) for (a) CeNiAsO and (b) the nonmagnetic reference LaNiAsO. (c) The $T = 7 K$ difference spectrum: $\tilde{I} (Q, E) = I_{Ce} - r I_{La}$ where $r = σ_{CeNiAsO} / σ_{LaNiAsO}$ . (d),(e) Momentum-integrated scattering at $T = 7 K$ and 200 K inferred from the method in Refs. [38, 39, 40]. The horizontal black bar indicates energy resolution. The inset in (d) shows a magnetic excitation at 2 meV in the ordered state with $E_{i} = 50 meV$ (brown dots). The cyan and red solid lines were calculated for the crystal field model described in the text.
Reuse & Permissions

Physical Review Letters