Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Quantum Phase Transition at Nonzero Doping in a Random tJ Model

Henry Shackleton, Alexander Wietek, Antoine Georges, and Subir Sachdev
Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 136602 – Published 30 March 2021
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

We present exact diagonalization results on finite clusters of a tJ model of spin-1/2 electrons with random all-to-all hopping and exchange interactions. We argue that such random models capture qualitatively the strong local correlations needed to describe the cuprates and related compounds, while avoiding lattice space group symmetry breaking orders. The previously known spin glass ordered phase in the insulator at doping p=0 extends to a metallic spin glass phase up to a transition p=pc1/3. The dynamic spin susceptibility shows signatures of the spectrum of the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models near pc. We also find signs of the phase transition in the entropy, entanglement entropy, and compressibility, all of which exhibit a maximum near pc. The electron energy distribution function in the metallic phase is consistent with a disordered extension of the Luttinger-volume Fermi surface for p>pc, while this breaks down for p<pc.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 16 December 2020
  • Accepted 5 March 2021

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.136602

© 2021 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Henry Shackleton1, Alexander Wietek2, Antoine Georges2,3,4,5, and Subir Sachdev1

  • 1Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA
  • 2Center for Computational Quantum Physics, Flatiron Institute, New York, New York 10010, USA
  • 3Collège de France, 11 place Marcelin Berthelot, 75005 Paris, France
  • 4CPHT, CNRS, École Polytechnique, IP Paris, F-91128 Palaiseau, France
  • 5DQMP, Université de Genève, 24 quai Ernest Ansermet, CH-1211 Genève, Switzerland

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 126, Iss. 13 — 2 April 2021

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    The spectral function χ′′(ω) of the random tJ model, averaged over 100 disorder realizations on an 18-site cluster. At low dopings, a sharp peak at low frequency at low doping is indicative of spin glass order. With increasing doping, the magnitude of this peak is reduced, and the low-frequency behavior closely resembles the rescaled spectral function of the large-M SYK theory [13, 18, 19]. Inset: After an extrapolation to the thermodynamic limit, the integrated weight of the low-frequency peak is nonzero, indicating spin glass order. This weight vanishes near p0.4. Plotted is the integrated weight for 8N18 (as a gradient from red to blue) and the large-N extrapolation with error bars.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Thermodynamics of the random tJ model for system sizes N=12, 16, 18, indicated by increasing opacity. (a) The specific heat C as a function of temperature for various values of doping. (b) The linear-in-T coefficient of specific heat, γ=C/T, for various dopings as a function of temperature, and (c) for T=0.05 as a function of doping. (d) The thermal entropy S as a function of doping for various temperatures.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    (a) The ground state entanglement entropy SvN of subsystems of size M. Results are compared for total system size N=10, 12, 16, shown as increasing opacity. The maxima are attained at values close to p=1/3, indicated by the gray dashed line. (b) Charge susceptibility χc for different temperatures at N=18. The low-temperature maximum at doping p=1/3 is shifted toward a smaller doping p0.2 at higher temperatures.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4

    (a) At high values of doping, the one-particle energy distribution function drops sharply near the energy level predicted by Luttinger’s theorem (marked by crosses). At lower values of doping, this function becomes more broadened, suggesting a breakdown of Luttinger’s theorem. (b) A comparison of the Fermi energy given by Luttinger’s theorem and the numerically computed value given by the inflection point of the one-particle energy distribution function. For a 16-site cluster, the two show good agreement up to a critical value between 6/16=0.38 and 7/16=0.44, in contrast with the same quantity computed for free fermions which agree well for all values of doping.

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review Letters

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×