Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

High oxygen pressure floating zone growth and crystal structure of the metallic nickelates R4Ni3O10 (R=La,Pr)

Junjie Zhang, Hong Zheng, Yu-Sheng Chen, Yang Ren, Masao Yonemura, Ashfia Huq, and J. F. Mitchell
Phys. Rev. Materials 4, 083402 – Published 13 August 2020
PDFHTMLExport Citation

Abstract

Single crystals of the metallic Ruddlesden-Popper trilayer nickelates R4Ni3O10 (R=La,Pr) were successfully grown using an optical-image floating zone furnace under oxygen pressure (pO2) of 20 bar for La4Ni3O10 and 140 bar for Pr4Ni3O10. A combination of synchrotron and laboratory x-ray single-crystal diffraction, high-resolution synchrotron x-ray powder diffraction and measurements of physical properties revealed that R4Ni3O10 (R=La,Pr) crystallizes in the monoclinic P21/a (Z=2) space group at room temperature, and that a metastable orthorhombic phase (Bmab) can be trapped by postgrowth rapid cooling. Both La4Ni3O10 and Pr4Ni3O10 crystals undergo a metal-to-metal transition (MMT) below room temperature. In the case of Pr4Ni3O10, the MMT is found at 157.6 K. For La4Ni3O10, the MMT depends on the lattice symmetry: 147.5 K for Bmab vs 138.6 K for P21/a. Lattice anomalies were found at the MMT that, when considered together with the pronounced dependence of the transition temperature on subtle structural differences between Bmab and P21/a phases, demonstrate a not insignificant coupling between electronic and lattice degrees of freedom in these trilayer nickelates.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
1 More
  • Received 7 April 2019
  • Revised 6 June 2020
  • Accepted 13 July 2020

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.083402

©2020 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Junjie Zhang1,2,*, Hong Zheng1, Yu-Sheng Chen3, Yang Ren4, Masao Yonemura5, Ashfia Huq6, and J. F. Mitchell1,†

  • 1Materials Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA
  • 2Materials Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA and Institute of Crystal Materials & State Key Laboratory of Crystal Materials, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250100, China
  • 3ChemMatCARS, The University of Chicago, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA
  • 4X-ray Science Division, Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA
  • 5Institute of Materials Structure Science, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization, 1-1 Oho, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0801, Japan and Sokendai (The Graduate University for Advanced Studies), Shirakata 203-1, Tokai, Naka 319-1106, Japan
  • 6Neutron Scattering Science Directorate, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA

  • *junjie@sdu.edu.cn
  • mitchell@anl.gov

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Supplemental Material (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 4, Iss. 8 — August 2020

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Rapid cooling products from a melt of La2O3:NiO=2:3 at various oxygen pressures. (a) Powder x-ray diffraction patterns vs pO2 with standard patterns of Lan+1NinO3n+1 (n=1, 2, 3, and ∞) from the ICDD database shown as tick marks below the data. (b) Schematic drawing of empirical phase predominance as a function of pO2.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    High-energy synchrotron x-ray single-crystal diffraction from an as-grown La4Ni3O10 crystal. (a) Photograph of as-grown boule with crystal growth direction parallel to the ab plane. (b) Cleaved La4Ni3O10 crystals from (a). (c) a La4Ni3O10 crystal ∼4.5 mm in length attached on Kapton tape and its diffraction patterns at various positions (d)–(n) (λ=0.117Å, 11-ID-C, APS; beam size 0.8×0.8mm2, scan step size 0.5 mm). Note that diffuse scattering is observed in the hk0 plane, reflecting some short-range deviation from the average structure. The vertical lines in (e)–(l) are artifacts caused by overexposure. The observation of multiple spots close together signifies twinning.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    Physical properties of P21/a, Bmab La4Ni3O10, and Pr4Ni3O10. (a), (d), (g) Resistivity, magnetic susceptibility, and heat capacity of P21/a La4Ni3O10. (b), (e), (h) Resistivity, magnetic susceptibility, and heat capacity of Bmab La4Ni3O10. (c), (f), (i) Resistivity, magnetic susceptibility, and heat capacity of Pr4Ni3O10.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4

    Crystal structures and coordination environments of Ni atoms in R4Ni3O10 (R=La, Pr) from single-crystal diffraction. (a)–(c) Bmab La4Ni3O10; (d)–(f) P21/a La4Ni3O10.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 5
    Figure 5

    Heat capacity of two specimens of as-grown biphasic La4Ni3O10 before and after annealing. See text for details.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 6
    Figure 6

    High-resolution synchrotron x-ray powder diffraction pattern and Rietveld refinement of biphasic La4Ni3O10. Insets show the quality of fit in the Q range 2.2552.277Å1.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 7
    Figure 7

    Temperature dependence of lattice parameters of La4Ni3O10 from 100 to 923 K obtained from Rietveld refinement of high-resolution synchrotron powder x-ray diffraction patterns. (a) a and b axes of P21/a and Bmab La4Ni3O10. (b) c axis. (c) β of P21/a. (d) Volume. (e) Thermal expansion coefficients obtained from refined lattice parameters. Note the lattice parameters were obtained from two samples, one measured from 100 to 300 K, and the other measured from 321 to 923 K.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 8
    Figure 8

    Annealing effect on biphasic La4Ni3O10. (a) High-resolution synchrotron x-ray powder diffraction pattern of as-grown La4Ni3O10. (b) Annealed La4Ni3O10 at 1 bar O2. Insets show the quality of fit in Q range 2.2552.277Å1. (c) Comparison of the peaks before and after annealing in the range of 2.25Q2.285Å1 by normalizing their heights.

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review Materials

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×