Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Bulk transport paths through defects in floating zone and Al flux grown SmB6

Yun Suk Eo, Alexa Rakoski, Shriya Sinha, Dmitri Mihaliov, Wesley T. Fuhrman, Shanta R. Saha, Priscila F. S. Rosa, Zachary Fisk, Monica Ciomaga Hatnean, Geetha Balakrishnan, Juan R. Chamorro, W. Adam Phelan, Seyed M. Koohpayeh, Tyrel M. McQueen, Boyoun Kang, Myung-suk Song, Beongki Cho, Michael S. Fuhrer, Johnpierre Paglione, and Çağlıyan Kurdak
Phys. Rev. Materials 5, 055001 – Published 7 May 2021

Abstract

We investigate the roles of disorder on low-temperature transport in SmB6 crystals grown by both the Al flux and floating zone methods. We used the inverted resistance method with Corbino geometry to investigate whether low-temperature variations in the standard resistance plateau arise from a surface or a bulk channel in floating zone samples. The results show significant sample-dependent residual bulk conduction, in contrast to smaller amounts of residual bulk conduction previously observed in Al flux grown samples with Sm vacancies. We consider hopping in an activated impurity band as a possible source for the observed bulk conduction, but it is unlikely that the large residual bulk conduction seen in floating zone samples is solely due to Sm vacancies. We therefore propose that one-dimensional defects, or dislocations, contribute as well. Using chemical etching, we find evidence for dislocations in both flux and floating zone samples, with higher dislocation density in floating zone samples than in Al flux grown samples. In addition to the possibility of transport through one-dimensional dislocations, we also discuss our results in the context of recent theoretical models of SmB6.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 20 November 2020
  • Accepted 24 March 2021

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.055001

©2021 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Yun Suk Eo1,2,*,†, Alexa Rakoski1,*,‡, Shriya Sinha1, Dmitri Mihaliov1, Wesley T. Fuhrman2,3, Shanta R. Saha2, Priscila F. S. Rosa4, Zachary Fisk5, Monica Ciomaga Hatnean6, Geetha Balakrishnan6, Juan R. Chamorro3, W. Adam Phelan3,7,4,8, Seyed M. Koohpayeh3,7, Tyrel M. McQueen3,8,7, Boyoun Kang9, Myung-suk Song9, Beongki Cho9, Michael S. Fuhrer10,11, Johnpierre Paglione2,12, and Çağlıyan Kurdak1

  • 1Department of Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA
  • 2Maryland Quantum Materials Center and Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA
  • 3Institute for Quantum Matter and Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA
  • 4Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
  • 5Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Irvine, California 92697, USA
  • 6Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom
  • 7Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA
  • 8Department of Chemistry, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USA
  • 9Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Gwangju 61005, Korea
  • 10School of Physics and Astronomy, Monash University, Monash, Victoria 3800, Australia
  • 11ARC Centre of Excellence in Future Low-Energy Electronics Technologies, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia
  • 12Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 1Z8

  • *These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • eohyung@umich.edu
  • ralexa@umich.edu

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 5, Iss. 5 — May 2021

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Standard and inverted resistance measurements of four floating zone grown SmB6 samples.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2

    Bulk resistivity conversion from Fig. 1 measurements using Eqs. (1) and (3).

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3

    Sketch of dislocations in a floating zone crystal. Some dislocations (green) initiate within a slice of thickness ε, and others (blue) terminate within that slice. The remaining dislocations (gray) form and terminate elsewhere in the sample.

    Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4

    Examples of etch pits on the (100) surfaces of (a) a floating zone sample etched for 340 s and (b) a flux grown sample etched for 600 s.

    Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review Materials

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×