Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
  • Open Access

Muon collider interaction region design

Y. I. Alexahin, E. Gianfelice-Wendt, V. V. Kashikhin, N. V. Mokhov, A. V. Zlobin, and V. Y. Alexakhin
Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 14, 061001 – Published 2 June 2011

Abstract

Design of a muon collider interaction region (IR) presents a number of challenges arising from low β*<1cm, correspondingly large beta-function values and beam sizes at IR magnets, as well as the necessity to protect superconducting magnets and collider detectors from muon decay products. As a consequence, the designs of the IR optics, magnets and machine-detector interface are strongly interlaced and iterative. A consistent solution for the 1.5 TeV center-of-mass muon collider IR is presented. It can provide an average luminosity of 1034cm2s1 with an adequate protection of magnet and detector components.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
2 More
  • Received 28 October 2010

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.14.061001

This article is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Y. I. Alexahin, E. Gianfelice-Wendt, V. V. Kashikhin, N. V. Mokhov, and A. V. Zlobin

  • FNAL, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA

V. Y. Alexakhin

  • JINR, Dubna 141980, Russia

Article Text

Click to Expand

References

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 14, Iss. 6 — June 2011

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article part of CHORUS

Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×

Images

  • Figure 1
    Figure 1
    IR layout and optics functions (top) and chromatic functions (bottom).Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 2
    Figure 2
    Fractional betatron tunes (top) and momentum compaction factor (bottom) vs momentum.Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 3
    Figure 3
    Beam sizes and aperture of the FF magnets.Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 4
    Figure 4
    Cross sections and a good-field region of Q1 (a), Q2 (b), and Q3–Q5 (c) quadrupoles. The dark blue color corresponds to the field error |δB/B|<104.Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 5
    Figure 5
    Cross sections and a good-field region of the dipole B1 based on cosθ (left) and open midplane (right) coil design. The dark blue color corresponds to the field error of |δB/B|<104.Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 6
    Figure 6
    Deposited power density in Q1 (mW/g) for three cases: standard (left), with absorbers inside (center), and with horizontal displacement (right). Larger radii are on the left of the plots.Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 7
    Figure 7
    Power density (mW/g) in B1 dipole for case (iii).Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 8
    Figure 8
    Electron (top) and gamma (bottom) fluxes in the detector in three cases described in the text.Reuse & Permissions
  • Figure 9
    Figure 9
    Gamma flux vs inner cone angle at different positions of minimal aperture from IP.Reuse & Permissions
×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review Accelerators and Beams

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

×

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×