Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1047788.1047835acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicailConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Visualizing association rules for feedback within the legal system

Published: 24 June 2003 Publication History

Abstract

Knowledge discovery from databases (KDD) exercises in law have typically attempted to derive knowledge about decision making processes in the legal domain automatically from datasets. This is made difficult in that real data that represents aspects of a decision process in law is commonly stored as text and rarely stored in structured databases. The central claim advanced here is that KDD processes can be usefully applied to existing datasets of client and demographic data in order to provide feedback for the effective operation of organizations within the legal system. However, the cost of data mining suites and the scarcity of specialized personnel for these tools mitigates against their use. In this study data mining with Association Rules (AR) has been performed on a data-set of over 380,000 records from a legal aid agency. Methods to visualise patterns in order to suggest and test plausible hypotheses from the data have been developed. The tool, called WebAssociate is entirely web based. Domain experts using the tool report favorable responses.

References

[1]
S. D. Bay and M. J. Pazzani. Detecting change in categorical data: Mining contrast sets. In Proceedings of the Fifth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pages 302--306, 1999.
[2]
T. Bench-Capon. Neural networks and open texture. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. ICAIL'93, pages 292--297. IAAIL, ACM Press, 1993.
[3]
T. Bench-Capon, F. Coenend, and P. Leng. An expirment in discovering association rules in the legal domain. In 11th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA'00), pages 1056--1060. IEEE Computer Society, 2000.
[4]
Y. B. Liu, W. Hsu. Identifying non-actionable association rules. ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, August 2001.
[5]
P. H. Hofmann and F. Wilhelm. Visulising association rules with interactive mosaic plots. Communications of ACM-KDD Boston, 2000.
[6]
J. B. Hobson and D. Slee. Rules, cases and networks in a legal domain. Law, Computers and Artificial Intelligence, 2(2):119--135, 1993.
[7]
R. A. R. Bayardo. Mining the most interesting rules. ACM SIGKDD, pages 145--154, 1999.
[8]
A. S. Rakesh Agrawal, Tomasz Imielinski. Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases. ACM SIGMOD, 1993.
[9]
E. Rissland and T. Friedman. Detecting change in legal concepts. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. ICAIL'95, pages 127--136. IAAIL, ACM Press, 1995.
[10]
J. S. Ivkovic, A. Stranieri. Discovering interesting association rules from legal databases. Information and Communication Technology Law, Vol 11(1), 2002.
[11]
A. Stranieri, J. Zeleznikow, and H. Turner. Data mining in law with association rules. In Proceedings of IASTED International conference on Law and Technology., pages 129--135, 2000.
[12]
C. Tata. Conceptions and representations of the sentencing decision process. Journal of Law and Society, Vol 24:395, 1997.
[13]
D. Wilkins and K. Pillaipakkamnatt. The effectiveness of machine learning techniques for predicting time to case dispositin. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pages 106--113. AIL, ACM Press, 1997.
[14]
C. W. J. Frawley, G. Piatetsky-Shapiro. Knowledge discovery in databases: an overview. AAAI/MIT Press, pages 1--27, 1991.
[15]
J. X. Lin, H. White. Associative searching and visualization. SSGRR 2001, 2001.
[16]
J. Zeleznikow and A. Stranieri. Knowledge discovery in the split up project. In Proceedings of Sixth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pages 89--97, 1997.

Cited By

View all
  • (2011)Accounting for Social, Spatial, and Textual InterconnectionsComputer Applications for Handling Legal Evidence, Police Investigation and Case Argumentation10.1007/978-90-481-8990-8_6(483-765)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2011
  • (2007)An introduction to association rule mining: An application in counseling and help-seeking behavior of adolescentsBehavior Research Methods10.3758/BF0319315639:2(259-266)Online publication date: May-2007
  • (2005)Applying anatomical therapeutic chemical (ATC) and critical term ontologies to Australian drug safety data for association rules and adverse event signallingProceedings of the 2005 Australasian Ontology Workshop - Volume 5810.5555/1151936.1151948(93-98)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2005
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Visualizing association rules for feedback within the legal system

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ICAIL '03: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law
    June 2003
    304 pages
    ISBN:1581137478
    DOI:10.1145/1047788
    • Conference Chair:
    • John Zeleznikow,
    • Program Chair:
    • Giovanni Sartor
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 24 June 2003

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. association rules
    2. data mining
    3. group differences
    4. hypothesis testing
    5. interactive exploration
    6. visualisation

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 69 of 169 submissions, 41%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 22 Sep 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2011)Accounting for Social, Spatial, and Textual InterconnectionsComputer Applications for Handling Legal Evidence, Police Investigation and Case Argumentation10.1007/978-90-481-8990-8_6(483-765)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2011
    • (2007)An introduction to association rule mining: An application in counseling and help-seeking behavior of adolescentsBehavior Research Methods10.3758/BF0319315639:2(259-266)Online publication date: May-2007
    • (2005)Applying anatomical therapeutic chemical (ATC) and critical term ontologies to Australian drug safety data for association rules and adverse event signallingProceedings of the 2005 Australasian Ontology Workshop - Volume 5810.5555/1151936.1151948(93-98)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2005
    • (2004)Building Intelligent Legal Decision Support Systems: Past Practice and Future ChallengesApplied Intelligent Systems10.1007/978-3-540-39972-8_7(201-254)Online publication date: 2004

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media