Article

Free access

How to deal with deviations during process model enactment

Authors:

G. Cugola,

E. Di Nitto,

C. Ghezzi,

M. MantioneAuthors Info & Claims

ICSE '95: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on Software engineering

Pages 265 - 273

https://doi.org/10.1145/225014.225039

Published: 23 April 1995 Publication History

PDF eReader

References

[1]

S. Arbaoui and F. Oquendo. PEACE: Goaloriented Logic-based Formalism for Process Modelling. In Anthony Finkelstein, Jeff Kramer, and Bashar Nuseibeh, edit ors, Software Process Modellzng and Technology. Research Studies Press, J. Wiley, 1994.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[2]

Robert Balzer. Tolerating Inconsistency. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Software Engineering-lCSE 13. IEEE Computer Society, 1991.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[3]

Sergio Bandinelli, Alfonso Fuggett a, and Carlo Ghezzi. Process Model Evolution in the SPADE Environment. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 19(12):1128-1144, December 1993.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[4]

Sergio Bandinelli, Elisabetta Di Nitto, and Alfonso Fuggetta. Policies and Mechanisms to Support Process Evolution in PSEES. In Third International Conference on the Software Process, Reston, Virginia, USA, October 1994.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[5]

M. Dowson and C. Fernstrom. Towards Requirements for Enacment Mechanisms. In Third European Workshop on Software Process Technology E WSPT'9J, Vil- Iard de Lans (Grenoble) France, February 1994.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[6]

A. Finkelstein, D. Gabbay, A. Hunter, and B. Nuseibeh. Inconsistency Handling in Multi-Perspective Specifications. In Fourth European Software Engineering Conference (ESEC'93), Garmish, Germany, September 1993.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[7]

C. Ghezzi and R.A. Kemmerer. ASTRAL: An Assertion Language for Specifying Real-Time Systems. In Proceedings of the %h. European Software Engineering Conference (ESEC'91), Milan, Italy, October 1991.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[8]

Philippe Jamart and Axel van Lamsweei-de. A Reflective Approach to Process Model Customization, Enhanchment and Evolution. In Third International Conference on the Software Process, Reston, Virginia, USA, October 1994.

Google Scholar

[9]

R.A. Kemmerer. Testing formaJ specifications to detect design errors. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 11(1):32-43, January 1985.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[10]

N. H. Minsky. Law-governed systems. Software Engineering Journal, pages 285-302, September 1991.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[11]

SPADE Team. Slang 1.1, process modeling user manual. Technical report, CEFRIEL, via Emanueli, 15 20126 Milano, 1994.

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Rezende LJulia SCardoso J(2012)Inconsistency Recovery in Business Processes Using a Possibilistic WorkFlow NetProceedings of the 2012 31st International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society10.1109/SCCC.2012.13(41-50)Online publication date: 12-Nov-2012
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/SCCC.2012.13
Rezende LJulia SCardoso J(2012)Possibilistic WorkFlow nets to deal with non-conformance in process execution2012 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC)10.1109/ICSMC.2012.6377898(1219-1224)Online publication date: Oct-2012
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.2012.6377898
Rochd AZrikem MAyadi AMillan TPercebois CBaron C(2011)SynchSPEM: A synchronization metamodel between activities and products within a SPEM-based Software Development Process2011 IEEE International Conference on Computer Applications and Industrial Electronics (ICCAIE)10.1109/ICCAIE.2011.6162181(471-476)Online publication date: Dec-2011
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCAIE.2011.6162181
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

How to deal with deviations during process model enactment
1. Social and professional topics
  1. Professional topics
    1. Management of computing and information systems
      1. Software management
2. Software and its engineering
  1. Software creation and management
    1. Designing software
  2. Software notations and tools
    1. Development frameworks and environments
    2. General programming languages
      1. Language types

Recommendations

Tolerating Deviations in Process Support Systems via Flexible Enactment of Process Models

Process Support Systems (PSSs) support business organizations in modeling, improving, and automating their business process. Thanks to their ability in enacting process models, they can be used to guide people in performing their daily work and to ...
A metalinguistic approach to process enactment extensibility
ICSP '96: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the Software Process (ICSP '96)

We present a model for developing rule based process servers with extensible syntax and semantics. New process enactment directives can be added to the syntax of the process modeling language, in which the process designer may specify specialized ...
The Process Enactment Tool Framework-Transformation of software process models to prepare enactment

Rich development process models contain information about structures for project organization and also for concrete outcomes of a project. However, rich processes are hard to implement. They often contain hundreds of pages of documentation. Development ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

ICSE '95: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on Software engineering

April 1995

336 pages

ISBN:0897917081

DOI:10.1145/225014

Chairman:
Dewayne Perry
AT&T Bell Labs

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 23 April 1995

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Qualifiers

Article

Conference

ICSE95

Sponsor:

SIGSOFT
IEEE-CS\TCSE

ICSE95: 17th International Conference on Software Engineering

April 24 - 28, 1995

Washington, Seattle, USA

Acceptance Rates

ICSE '95 Paper Acceptance Rate 28 of 155 submissions, 18%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 276 of 1,856 submissions, 15%

Upcoming Conference

ICSE 2025

2025 IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering

April 26 - May 3, 2025

Ottawa , ON , Canada

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

35
Total Citations
View Citations
449
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)46
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8

Reflects downloads up to 22 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Rezende LJulia SCardoso J(2012)Inconsistency Recovery in Business Processes Using a Possibilistic WorkFlow NetProceedings of the 2012 31st International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society10.1109/SCCC.2012.13(41-50)Online publication date: 12-Nov-2012
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/SCCC.2012.13
Rezende LJulia SCardoso J(2012)Possibilistic WorkFlow nets to deal with non-conformance in process execution2012 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC)10.1109/ICSMC.2012.6377898(1219-1224)Online publication date: Oct-2012
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.2012.6377898
Rochd AZrikem MAyadi AMillan TPercebois CBaron C(2011)SynchSPEM: A synchronization metamodel between activities and products within a SPEM-based Software Development Process2011 IEEE International Conference on Computer Applications and Industrial Electronics (ICCAIE)10.1109/ICCAIE.2011.6162181(471-476)Online publication date: Dec-2011
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCAIE.2011.6162181
Cugola GGhezzi CPinto L(2011)Process Programming in the Service Age: Old Problems and New ChallengesEngineering of Software10.1007/978-3-642-19823-6_10(163-177)Online publication date: 2011
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19823-6_10
Zazworka NStapel KKnauss EShull FBasili VSchneider KSucci GMorisio MNagappan N(2010)Are developers complying with the processProceedings of the 2010 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement10.1145/1852786.1852805(1-10)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2010
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1852786.1852805
Baresi LGuinea SShroff GJalote PRajamani S(2008)A dynamic and reactive approach to the supervision of BPEL processesProceedings of the 1st India software engineering conference10.1145/1342211.1342222(39-48)Online publication date: 19-Feb-2008
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1342211.1342222
Thompson STorabi TJoshi P(2007)A Framework to Detect Deviations During Process Enactment6th IEEE/ACIS International Conference on Computer and Information Science (ICIS 2007)10.1109/ICIS.2007.18(1066-1073)Online publication date: Jul-2007
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIS.2007.18
Alloui ILatrous SOquendo F(2005)A multi-agent approach for modelling, enacting and evolving distributed cooperative software processesSoftware Process Technology10.1007/BFb0017747(225-235)Online publication date: 10-Jun-2005
https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0017747
Alloui IOquendo F(2005)Managing consistency in cooperating software processesSoftware Process Technology10.1007/3-540-64956-5_7(92-99)Online publication date: 29-Jul-2005
https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-64956-5_7
Cîmpan SOquendo F(2005)Fuzzy indicators for monitoring software processesSoftware Process Technology10.1007/3-540-64956-5_4(43-59)Online publication date: 29-Jul-2005
https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-64956-5_4
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

Tolerating Deviations in Process Support Systems via Flexible Enactment of Process Models

A metalinguistic approach to process enactment extensibility

The Process Enactment Tool Framework-Transformation of software process models to prepare enactment

Comments

Published In

Sponsors

Publisher

Publication History

Permissions

Check for updates

Qualifiers

Conference

Acceptance Rates

Upcoming Conference

Other Metrics

Article Metrics

Other Metrics

Cited By

PDF

eReader

Login options

Full Access

References

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

Tolerating Deviations in Process Support Systems via Flexible Enactment of Process Models

A metalinguistic approach to process enactment extensibility

The Process Enactment Tool Framework-Transformation of software process models to prepare enactment

Comments

Information

Published In

Sponsors

Publisher

Publication History

Permissions

Check for updates

Qualifiers

Conference

Acceptance Rates

Upcoming Conference

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View options

PDF

eReader

Get Access

Login options

Full Access

Figures

Other

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media

Affiliations