Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2487788.2487994acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Rule-based opinion target and aspect extraction to acquire affective knowledge

Published: 13 May 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Opinion holder and opinion target extraction are among the most popular and challenging problems tackled by opinion mining researchers, recognizing the significant business value of such components and their importance for applications such as media monitoring and Web intelligence. This paper describes an approach that combines opinion target extraction with aspect extraction using syntactic patterns. It expands previous work limited by sentence boundaries and includes a heuristic for anaphora resolution to identify targets across sentences. Furthermore, it demonstrates the application of concepts known from research on open information extraction to the identification of relevant opinion aspects. Qualitative analyses performed on a corpus of 100,000 Amazon product reviews show that the approach is promising. The extracted opinion targets and aspects are useful for enriching common knowledge resources and opinion mining ontologies, and support practitioners and researchers to identify opinions in document collections.

References

[1]
B. Baldwin. CogNIAC: High Precision Coreference with Limited Knowledge and Linguistic Resources Abstract. In Proceedings of a Workshop on Operational Factors in Practical, Robust Anaphora Resolution for Unrestricted Texts, pages 38--45, Madrid, Spain, 1997.
[2]
E. Cambria, R. Speer, C. Havasi, and A. Hussain. SenticNet: A Publicly Available Semantic Resource for Opinion Mining. In AAAI Symposium on Commonsense Knowledge, pages 14--18, 2010.
[3]
E. Charniak and M. Elsner. EM Works for Pronoun Anaphora Resolution. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL 2009), pages 148--156, 2009.
[4]
O. Etzioni, M. Banko, S. Soderland, and D. S. Weld. Open information extraction from the web. Communications of the ACM, 51(12):68--74, 2008.
[5]
A. Fader, S. Soderland, and O. Etzioni. Identifying relations for open information extraction. In Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2011.
[6]
C. Havasi, S. Street, R. Speer, and J. B. Alonso. ConceptNet 3: a Flexible, Multilingual Semantic Network for Common Sense Knowledge. In Proceedings of Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, 2007.
[7]
N. Jakob and I. Gurevych. Extracting Opinion Targets in a Single- and Cross-Domain Setting with Conditional Random Fields. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2010), pages 1035--1045, 2010.
[8]
N. Jakob and I. Gurevych. Using Anaphora Resolution to Improve Opinion Target Identification in Movie Reviews. In Proceedings of the ACL 2010 Conference Short Papers, pages 263--268, Uppsala, Sweden, 2010.
[9]
R. Y. Lau, S. S. Y. Liao, K. F. Wong, and D. K. W. Chiu. W 2.0 Environmental Scanning and Adaptive Decision Support for Business Mergers and Acquisitions. MIS Quarterly, 36(4):1239--1268, 2012.
[10]
T. Lin, Mausam, and O. Etzioni. Identifying functional relations in web text. In Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP '10, pages 1266--1276, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2010. Association for Computational Linguistics.
[11]
M. P. Marcus, M. A. Marcinkiewicz, and B. Santorini. Building a large annotated corpus of english: the penn treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19(2):313--330, June 1993.
[12]
R. Mitkov. Robust pronoun resolution with limited knowledge. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 869--875, 1998.
[13]
A. Moro and R. Navigli. WiSeNet: building a wikipedia-based semantic network with ontologized relations. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management, CIKM '12, pages 1672--1676, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM.
[14]
T. Nakagawa, K. Inui, and S. Kurohashi. Dependency Tree-based Sentiment Classification using CRFs with Hidden Variables. In Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (HLT), pages 786--794, 2010.
[15]
G. Qiu, B. Liu, J. Bu, and C. Chen. Opinion Word Expansion and Target Extraction through Double Propagation. Computational Linguistics, 37(1):9--27, 2011.
[16]
J. Ruppenhofer, S. Somasundaran, and J. Wiebe. Finding the Sources and Targets of Subjective Expressions. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), 2008.
[17]
A. B. Sayeed, J. Boyd-Graber, B. Rusk, and A. Weinberg. Grammatical Structures for Word-Level Sentiment Detection. In Proceedings of the 2012 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL HLT), pages 667--676, 2012.
[18]
Y. Wu, M. Wang, and P. Jin. Disambiguating Dynamic Sentiment Ambiguous Adjectives. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING), number August, pages 1191--1199, Beijing, Oct. 2010.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Review on sentiment analysis for text classification techniques from 2010 to 2021Multimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-022-14112-382:6(8137-8193)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2022
  • (2021)360 degree view of cross-domain opinion classification: a surveyArtificial Intelligence Review10.1007/s10462-020-09884-954:2(1385-1506)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2021
  • (2020)Customized ranking for products through online reviews: a method incorporating prospect theory with an improved VIKORApplied Intelligence10.1007/s10489-019-01577-350:6(1725-1744)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2020
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
WWW '13 Companion: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web
May 2013
1636 pages
ISBN:9781450320382
DOI:10.1145/2487788

Sponsors

  • NICBR: Nucleo de Informatcao e Coordenacao do Ponto BR
  • CGIBR: Comite Gestor da Internet no Brazil

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 13 May 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. opinion aspect extraction
  2. opinion mining
  3. opinion target extraction

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

WWW '13
Sponsor:
  • NICBR
  • CGIBR
WWW '13: 22nd International World Wide Web Conference
May 13 - 17, 2013
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Acceptance Rates

WWW '13 Companion Paper Acceptance Rate 831 of 1,250 submissions, 66%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 21 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Review on sentiment analysis for text classification techniques from 2010 to 2021Multimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-022-14112-382:6(8137-8193)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2022
  • (2021)360 degree view of cross-domain opinion classification: a surveyArtificial Intelligence Review10.1007/s10462-020-09884-954:2(1385-1506)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2021
  • (2020)Customized ranking for products through online reviews: a method incorporating prospect theory with an improved VIKORApplied Intelligence10.1007/s10489-019-01577-350:6(1725-1744)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2020
  • (2019)CHOpinionMiner: An unsupervised system for Chinese opinion target extractionConcurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience10.1002/cpe.558232:7Online publication date: 29-Nov-2019
  • (2017)Aspect-Based Extraction and Analysis of Affective Knowledge from Social Media StreamsIEEE Intelligent Systems10.1109/MIS.2017.5732:3(80-88)Online publication date: 1-May-2017
  • (2017)RubEInformation and Management10.1016/j.im.2016.05.00754:2(166-176)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2017
  • (2016)Detection of Valid Sentiment-Target Pairs in Online Product Reviews and News Media Articles2016 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI)10.1109/WI.2016.0024(97-104)Online publication date: Oct-2016
  • (2015)Modeling and extracting evaluation objects on social media short content2015 7th International Conference on Modelling, Identification and Control (ICMIC)10.1109/ICMIC.2015.7409471(1-6)Online publication date: Dec-2015
  • (2015)Learning-based aspect identification in customer review products2015 International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics (ICEEI)10.1109/ICEEI.2015.7352472(71-76)Online publication date: Aug-2015
  • (2015)Towards Domain-Independent Opinion Target ExtractionProceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshop (ICDMW)10.1109/ICDMW.2015.255(1326-1331)Online publication date: 14-Nov-2015
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media