Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2636582.2637347acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobihocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A comparison of OLSR and OSPF-MDR for large-scale airborne mobile ad-hoc networks

Published: 11 August 2014 Publication History

Abstract

In this paper, we compare the proactive MANET routing schemes of OLSR and OSPF-MDR via high-fidelity simulation, and consider their suitability for large-scale airborne networks. A successful MANET routing scheme must be bandwidth efficient and robust to frequent topology changes. To assess the two protocols, we simulate them in networks with up to 400 mobile nodes, under a variety of network densities. We evaluate them on the basis of the amount of routing overhead generated, the rate of successful packet delivery, and the time it takes until all of the routing tables converge. We find that OLSR requires up to an order magnitude higher router overhead than OSPF-MDR, while providing only a marginal benefit in packet delivery success rates. The largest difference between the two protocols is the time it takes for their routing tables to converge in the presence of packet loss. OLSR has consistent convergence times for networks of all sizes, while the convergence time of OSPF-MDR increases with network size.

References

[1]
C. Wilson, "Network centric operations: Background and oversight issues for congress." Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) Document, 2007.
[2]
T. Clausen and P. Jaqcquet, "Optimized link state routing (olsr)," IETF RFC 3626, 2003.
[3]
R. Ogier and P. Spagnolo, "Mobile ad hoc network (manet) extension of ospf using connected dominating set (cds) ooding," IETF RFC 5614, August, 2009.
[4]
E. M. Royer and C.-K. Toh, "A review of current routing protocols for ad hoc mobile wireless networks," Personal Communications, IEEE, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 46--55, 1999.
[5]
C. Mbarushimana and A. Shahrabi, "Comparative study of reactive and proactive routing protocols performance in mobile ad hoc networks," in Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops, 2007, vol. 2. IEEE, 2007, pp. 679--684.
[6]
S. Ade and P. Tijare, "Performance comparison of aodv, dsdv, olsr and dsr routing protocols in mobile ad hoc networks," International Journal of Information Technology and Knowledge Management, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 545{548, 2010.
[7]
A. K. BR, L. C. Reddy, and P. S. Hiremath, "Performance comparison of wireless mobile ad-hoc network routing protocols," IJCSNS, vol. 8, no. 6, p. 337, 2008.
[8]
J. Fang, T. Go, and G. Pei, "Comparison studies of ospf-mdr, olsr and composite routing," in MILCOM 2010. IEEE, 2010, pp. 989--994.
[9]
B.-N. Cheng and S. Moore, "A comparison of manet routing protocols on airborne tactical networks," in MILCOM 2012. IEEE, 2012, pp. 1--6.
[10]
O. M. Documentation, "Opnet technologies," Inc.{Internet} http://www. opnet. com, 2003.
[11]
A. Qayyum, L. Viennot, and A. Laouiti, "Multipoint relaying for ooding broadcast messages in mobile wireless networks," in Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2002. HICSS., pp. 3866--3875.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Role of Dynamic Routing in Traffic Engineered Space Mesh Networks2024 IEEE Aerospace Conference10.1109/AERO58975.2024.10521359(1-7)Online publication date: 2-Mar-2024
  • (2022)HIRO-NET: Heterogeneous Intelligent Robotic Network for Internet Sharing in Disaster ScenariosIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing10.1109/TMC.2021.307805021:12(4367-4380)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2022
  • (2019)HIRO-NET: Self-Organized Robotic Mesh Networking for Internet Sharing in Disaster Scenarios2019 IEEE 20th International Symposium on "A World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks" (WoWMoM)10.1109/WoWMoM.2019.8793029(1-9)Online publication date: Jun-2019
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. A comparison of OLSR and OSPF-MDR for large-scale airborne mobile ad-hoc networks

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Information & Contributors

        Information

        Published In

        cover image ACM Conferences
        AIRBORNE '14: Proceedings of the third ACM workshop on Airborne networks and communications
        August 2014
        28 pages
        ISBN:9781450329859
        DOI:10.1145/2636582
        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Sponsors

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        Published: 11 August 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions for this article.

        Check for updates

        Author Tags

        1. manet
        2. olsr
        3. ospf-mdr

        Qualifiers

        • Research-article

        Conference

        MobiHoc'14
        Sponsor:

        Acceptance Rates

        AIRBORNE '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 2 of 3 submissions, 67%;
        Overall Acceptance Rate 7 of 8 submissions, 88%

        Contributors

        Other Metrics

        Bibliometrics & Citations

        Bibliometrics

        Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)18
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
        Reflects downloads up to 21 Sep 2024

        Other Metrics

        Citations

        Cited By

        View all
        • (2024)Role of Dynamic Routing in Traffic Engineered Space Mesh Networks2024 IEEE Aerospace Conference10.1109/AERO58975.2024.10521359(1-7)Online publication date: 2-Mar-2024
        • (2022)HIRO-NET: Heterogeneous Intelligent Robotic Network for Internet Sharing in Disaster ScenariosIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing10.1109/TMC.2021.307805021:12(4367-4380)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2022
        • (2019)HIRO-NET: Self-Organized Robotic Mesh Networking for Internet Sharing in Disaster Scenarios2019 IEEE 20th International Symposium on "A World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks" (WoWMoM)10.1109/WoWMoM.2019.8793029(1-9)Online publication date: Jun-2019
        • (2019)Segment Routing Based Traffic Scheduling for the Software-Defined Airborne Backbone NetworkIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2019.29302297(106162-106178)Online publication date: 2019
        • (2016)Experimental estimate of using the ant colony optimization algorithm to solve the routing problem in FANET2016 International Siberian Conference on Control and Communications (SIBCON)10.1109/SIBCON.2016.7491805(1-10)Online publication date: May-2016
        • (2016)Modeling of bio-inspired algorithms AntHocNet and BeeAdHoc for Flying Ad Hoc Networks (FANETs)2016 13th International Scientific-Technical Conference on Actual Problems of Electronics Instrument Engineering (APEIE)10.1109/APEIE.2016.7806419(90-99)Online publication date: Oct-2016

        View Options

        Get Access

        Login options

        View options

        PDF

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Media

        Figures

        Other

        Tables

        Share

        Share

        Share this Publication link

        Share on social media