Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2652524.2652569acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesesemConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A systematic mapping study on testing technique experiments: has the situation changed since 2000?

Published: 18 September 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Context: Juristo et al. [7] published a literature review about testing technique experiments. The goal was to provide a picture of which techniques and aspects of techniques had been studied experimentally, and try to compile a body of knowledge on testing techniques. Goal: In this paper, we extend Juristo et al.'s study to cover the years from 2000 (where it ended) until 2013. Method: We have performed a systematic mapping study. Results: The situation in testing experimentation has not changed since Juristo et al.'s study. Conclusions: The research field has the same shortcomings.

References

[1]
O. Dieste, A. Grimán, N. Juristo. Developing search strategies for detecting relevant experiments. Empirical Software Engineering, vol 14, no. 5, p. 513--539, 2009.
[2]
E. Engstrom, P. Runeson, M. Skoglund, A systematic review on regression test selection techniques, Information and Software Technology, vol. 52, no. 1, p. 14--30, 2010.
[3]
E. Engstrom, M. Skoglund, P. Runeson, Empirical evaluations of regression test selection techniques: A systematic review, In Proceedings of the 2nd ESEM, pp. 22--31, 2008.
[4]
Y. Jia, M. Harman, An analysis and survey of the development of mutation testing, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 37, no. 5, p. 649--678, 2011.
[5]
A. Jedlitschka, M. Ciolkowski, D. Pfahl. Reporting Experiments in Software Engineering. Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering. Springer, 2008.
[6]
N. Juristo, A. M. Moreno. Basics of Software Engineering Experimentation. Springer, 2001.
[7]
N. Juristo, A. M. Moreno, S. Vegas, Reviewing 25 Years of Testing Technique Experiments. Empirical Software Engineering, vol. 9, no. 1-2, pp. 7--44, 2004.
[8]
K. Petersen, R. Feldt, S. Mujtaba, M. Mattsson. Systematic mapping studies in software engineering. In Proceedings of the 12th EASE. pp. 71--80, 2008,
[9]
Y. Singh, A. Kaur, B. Suri, S. Singhal, Systematic literature review on regression test prioritization techniques, Informatica, vol. 36, no. 4, p. 379--408, 2012.
[10]
C. Wohlin, P. Runeson, M. Höst. Experimentation in Software Engineering. Springer, 2012.

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)Overlap between Automated Unit and Acceptance Testing – a Systematic Literature ReviewProceedings of the 26th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering10.1145/3530019.3530028(80-89)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2022
  • (2021)Global and Latin American female participation in evidence-based software engineering: a systematic mapping studyJournal of the Brazilian Computer Society10.1186/s13173-021-00109-727:1Online publication date: 19-Mar-2021
  • (2020)An Experimental Study for Complete-IOCO TheoryProceedings of the 5th Brazilian Symposium on Systematic and Automated Software Testing10.1145/3425174.3425232(107-116)Online publication date: 20-Oct-2020
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. A systematic mapping study on testing technique experiments: has the situation changed since 2000?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ESEM '14: Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement
    September 2014
    461 pages
    ISBN:9781450327749
    DOI:10.1145/2652524
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 18 September 2014

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. mapping study
    2. software testing techniques
    3. testing experiments

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    Conference

    ESEM '14
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    ESEM '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 23 of 123 submissions, 19%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 130 of 594 submissions, 22%

    Upcoming Conference

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 22 Sep 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2022)Overlap between Automated Unit and Acceptance Testing – a Systematic Literature ReviewProceedings of the 26th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering10.1145/3530019.3530028(80-89)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2022
    • (2021)Global and Latin American female participation in evidence-based software engineering: a systematic mapping studyJournal of the Brazilian Computer Society10.1186/s13173-021-00109-727:1Online publication date: 19-Mar-2021
    • (2020)An Experimental Study for Complete-IOCO TheoryProceedings of the 5th Brazilian Symposium on Systematic and Automated Software Testing10.1145/3425174.3425232(107-116)Online publication date: 20-Oct-2020
    • (2017)Effective Regression Test Case SelectionACM Computing Surveys10.1145/305726950:2(1-32)Online publication date: 25-May-2017

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media