Cited By
View all- Marichal SMalaisé AModugno VDermy OCharpillet FIvaldi S(2016)One-Shot Evaluation of the Control Interface of a Robotic Arm by Non-expertsSocial Robotics10.1007/978-3-319-47437-3_45(458-468)Online publication date: 7-Oct-2016
The Impact of User Control Design Types on People's Perception of a Robot
Pages 19 - 20
Abstract
This study suggests user control design as a way to increase social acceptance and usability of a robot. We executed a 3 (user control design: anthropomorphic control vs. non-anthropomorphic control vs. remote controller control) within-participants experiment design (N=24). When participants controlled a robot more anthropomorphically, they perceived a robot more sociable and were more satisfied with the service provided by a robot. This study provides evidence that user control design could be effectively used to increase social acceptance as well as usability of a robot. Implications for the design of human-robot interaction are discussed.
References
[1]
Mutlu, B., Forlizzi, J., and Hodgins, J. 2006. A Storytelling Robot: Modeling and Evaluation of Human-like Gaze Behavior. In Proc. of the Humanoids. 518--523.
[2]
Goetz, J., Kiesler, S., and Powers, A. 2003. Matching Robot Appearance and Behavior to Tasks to Improve Human-Robot Cooperation. In Proc. of the RO-MAN. 55--60.
[3]
De Ruyter, B., Saini, P., Markopoulos, P., and Van Breemen, A. 2005. Assessing the Effects of Building Social Intelligence in a Robotic Interface for the Home. Interacting with Computers. 17, 5, 522--541.
[4]
Fink, J. 2012. Anthropomorphism and Human Likeness in the Design of Robots and Human-Robot Interaction. In Proc. of the ICSR. 199--208.
[5]
Bartneck, C., Bleeker, T., Bun, J., Fens, P., and Riet, L. 2010. The Influence of Robot Anthropomorphism on the Feelings of Embarrassment When Interacting with Robots. Paladyn. 1, 2, 109--115.
[6]
Kwak, S.S. 2014. The Impact of the Robot Appearance Types on Social Interaction with a Robot and Service Evaluation of a Robot. Archives of Design Research. 27, 2, 81--93.
[7]
Choi, J.J. and Kwak, S.S. 2014. The Impact of Robot Appearance Types and Robot Behavior Types on People's Perception of a Robot. Journal of Digital Design. 14, 3, 1--11.
[8]
Kwak, S.S., Goh, T.D., and Ahn, K.Y. 2012. The Usability of a Robot and Human Empathy by Anthropomorphic Sound Feedback. Journal of Korean Society of Design Science. 23, 3, 20--27.
[9]
DiSalvo, C.F., Gemperle, F., Forlizzi, J., and Kiesler, S. 2002. All Robots are Not Created Equal: The Design and Perception of Human-Oriented Robot Heads. In Proc. of the DIS. 321--326.
[10]
Fink, J., Lemaignan, S., Dillenbourg, P., Rétornaz, P., Vaussard, F., Berthoud, A., and Franinović, K. 2014. Which Robot Behavior can Motivate Children to Tidy up Their Toys? Design and Evaluation of Ranger. In Proc. of the HRI. 439--446.
Index Terms
- The Impact of User Control Design Types on People's Perception of a Robot
Recommendations
Impact of Anthropomorphic Robot Design on Trust and Attention in Industrial Human-Robot Interaction
The application of anthropomorphic features to robots is generally considered beneficial for human-robot interaction (HRI). Although previous research has mainly focused on social robots, the phenomenon gains increasing attention in industrial human-Robot ...
Effects of robot-human versus robot-robot behavior and entitativity on anthropomorphism and willingness to interact
AbstractAs robots become prevalent, people are increasingly interacting with multiple robots at once. Thus, it is important to not only examine how robot behavior toward humans affects interaction, but how robot behavior toward other robots ...
Highlights- Social robot behavior toward robots increased anthropomorphism of robots.
- ...
I am my robot: the impact of robot-building and robot form on operators
HRI '09: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interactionAs robots become more pervasive, operators will develop richer relationships with them. In a 2 (robot form: humanoid vs. car) x 2 (assembler: self vs. other) between-participants experiment (N=56), participants assembled either a humanoid or car robot. ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
March 2015
336 pages
ISBN:9781450333184
DOI:10.1145/2701973
- General Chairs:
- Julie A. Adams,
- William Smart,
- Program Chairs:
- Bilge Mutlu,
- Leila Takayama
Copyright © 2015 Owner/Author.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.
Sponsors
- SIGAI: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
- RA: IEEE Robotics and Automation Society
- SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 02 March 2015
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Abstract
Conference
HRI '15: ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
March 2 - 5, 2015
Oregon, Portland, USA
Acceptance Rates
HRI'15 Extended Abstracts Paper Acceptance Rate 92 of 102 submissions, 90%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 192 of 519 submissions, 37%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- View Citations1Total Citations
- 212Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)9
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 21 Sep 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
Cited By
View all- Marichal SMalaisé AModugno VDermy OCharpillet FIvaldi S(2016)One-Shot Evaluation of the Control Interface of a Robotic Arm by Non-expertsSocial Robotics10.1007/978-3-319-47437-3_45(458-468)Online publication date: 7-Oct-2016
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in