Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3178876.3186180acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free access

Identifying Modes of User Engagement with Online News and Their Relationship to Information Gain in Text

Published: 10 April 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Prior work established the benefits of server-recorded user engagement measures (e.g. clickthrough rates) for improving the results of search engines and recommendation systems. Client-side measures of post-click behavior received relatively little attention despite the fact that publishers have now the ability to measure how millions of people interact with their content at a fine resolution using client-side logging. In this study, we examine patterns of user engagement in a large, client-side log dataset of over 7.7 million page views (including both mobile and non-mobile devices) of 66,821 news articles from seven popular news publishers. For each page view we use three summary statistics: dwell time, the furthest position the user reached on the page, and the amount of interaction with the page through any form of input (touch, mouse move, etc.). We show that simple transformations on these summary statistics reveal six prototypical modes of reading that range from scanning to extensive reading and persist across sites. Furthermore, we develop a novel measure of information gain in text to capture the development of ideas within the body of articles and investigate how information gain relates to the engagement with articles. Finally, we show that our new measure of information gain is particularly useful for predicting reading of news articles before publication, and that the measure captures unique information not available otherwise.

References

[1]
Eugene Agichtein, Eric Brill, and Susan Dumais. 2006. Improving web search ranking by incorporating user behavior information Proc. SIGIR 2006.
[2]
Ioannis Arapakis, Mounia Lalmas, B. Barla Cambazoglu, Mari-Carmen Marcos, and Joemon M. Jose. 2014. User engagement in online news: Under the scope of sentiment, interest, affect, and gaze. JASIST, Vol. 65, 10 (2014), 1988--2005.
[3]
Ralf Biedert, Jörn Hees, Andreas Dengel, and Georg Buscher. 2012. A robust realtime reading-skimming classifier. In Proc. ETRA 2012.
[4]
Sven Birkerts. 2006. The Gutenberg elegies: The fate of reading in an electronic age. Macmillan.
[5]
David M. Blei, Andrew Y. Ng, and Michael I. Jordan. 2003. Latent dirichlet allocation. JMLR, Vol. 3, Jan (2003), 993--1022.
[6]
Georg Buscher, Edward Cutrell, and Meredith R. Morris. 2009. What do you see when you're surfing?: using eye tracking to predict salient regions of web pages. In Proc. CHI 2009.
[7]
Christopher S. Campbell and Paul P. Maglio. 2001. A robust algorithm for reading detection. In Proc. PUI 2001.
[8]
Mark Claypool, Phong Le, Makoto Wased, and David Brown. 2001. Implicit Interest Indicators. In Proc. of IUI 2001. 33--40.
[9]
Microsoft Canada Consumer insights. 2015. Attention spans. (2015). https://advertising.microsoft.com/en/WWDocs/User/display/cl/researchreport/31966/en/microsoft-attention-spans-research-report.pdf
[10]
Geoffrey B. Duggan and Stephen J. Payne. 2009. Text skimming: the process and effectiveness of foraging through text under time pressure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, Vol. 15, 3 (2009), 228.
[11]
Geoffrey B. Duggan and Stephen J. Payne. 2011. Skim reading by satisficing: evidence from eye tracking Proc. of CHI'2011. ACM.
[12]
Steve Fox, Kuldeep Karnawat, Mark Mydland, Susan Dumais, and Thomas White. 2005. Evaluating implicit measures to improve web search. Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) Vol. 23, 2 (2005), 147--168.
[13]
Ruth Garner. 1987. Metacognition and reading comprehension.Ablex Publishing.
[14]
Daniel G. Goldstein, Siddharth Suri, R. Preston McAfee, Matthew Ekstrand-Abueg, and Fernando Diaz. 2014. The economic and cognitive costs of annoying display advertisements. Journal of Marketing Research Vol. 51, 6 (2014), 742--752.
[15]
Qi Guo and Eugene Agichtein. 2012. Beyond dwell time: estimating document relevance from cursor movements and other post-click searcher behavior. In Proc. WWW 2012.
[16]
Rafiq H. Hijazi and Robert W. Jernigan. 2009. Modelling compositional data using Dirichlet regression models. Applied Probability & Statistics Vol. 4, 1 (2009), 77--91.
[17]
William Horton, Lee Taylor, Arthur Ignacio, and Nancy L. Hoft. 1996. The Web page design cookbook: all the ingredients you need to create 5-star Web pages. New York: Wiley, 1996 (1996).
[18]
Jeff Huang, Ryen W. White, Georg Buscher, and Kuansan Wang. 2012. Improving searcher models using mouse cursor activity Proc. SIGIR 2012.
[19]
Clayton J. Hutto and Eric Gilbert. 2014. Vader: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text Proc. ICWSM 2014.
[20]
Peter H. Johnston. 1983. Reading comprehension assessment: A cognitive basis.ERIC.
[21]
Youngho Kim, Ahmed Hassan, Ryen W. White, and Imed Zitouni. 2014. Modeling dwell time to predict click-level satisfaction Proc. WSDM 2014.
[22]
J. Peter Kincaid, Robert P. Fishburne Jr., Richard L. Rogers, and Brad S. Chissom. 1975. Derivation of new readability formulas (automated readability index, fog count and flesch reading ease formula) for navy enlisted personnel. Technical Report. DTIC Document.
[23]
Dmitry Lagun and Eugene Agichtein. 2015. Inferring searcher attention by jointly modeling user interactions and content salience Proc. SIGIR 2015.
[24]
Dmitry Lagun and Mounia Lalmas. 2016. Understanding User Attention and Engagement in Online News Reading Proc. of WSDM 2016.
[25]
Quoc Le and Tomas Mikolov. 2014. Distributed representations of sentences and documents Proc. ICML 2014).
[26]
Janette Lehmann, Mounia Lalmas, Elad Yom-Tov, and Georges Dupret. 2012. Models of user engagement. In Proc. UMAP 2012.
[27]
Guoqiang Liao. 2011. On the Development of Reading Ability. Theory and Practice in Language Studies Vol. 1, 3 (2011), 302--305.
[28]
Chao Liu, Ryen W. White, and Susan Dumais. 2010. Understanding web browsing behaviors through weibull analysis of dwell time Proc. SIGIR 2010.
[29]
Ziming Liu. 2005. Reading behavior in the digital environment: Changes in reading behavior over the past ten years. Journal of documentation Vol. 61, 6 (2005), 700--712.
[30]
Michael E. Masson. 1982. Cognitive processes in skimming stories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Vol. 8, 5 (1982).
[31]
Amy Mitchell, Jeffrey Gottfried, Michael Barthel, and Elisa Shearer. 2016. The Modern News Consumer, News Attitudes and Practices in the Digital Era. (2016).
[32]
Masahiro Morita and Yoichi Shinoda. 1994. Information filtering based on user behavior analysis and best match text retrieval Proc. SIGIR 1994.
[33]
Vidhya Navalpakkam, LaDawn Jentzsch, Rory Sayres, Sujith Ravi, Amr Ahmed, and Alex Smola. 2013. Measurement and modeling of eye-mouse behavior in the presence of nonlinear page layouts Proc. WWW 2013.
[34]
Jakob Nielsen. 2008. How Little Do Users Read. (2008). http://www.nngroup.com/articles/how-little-do-users-read/
[35]
Christine Nuttall. 1996. Teaching reading skills in a foreign language. ERIC.
[36]
Peter Pirolli and Stuart Card. 1999. Information foraging. Psychological review Vol. 106, 4 (1999), 643.
[37]
Kenneth R. Pugh, Bennett A. Shaywitz, Sally E. Shaywitz, R. Todd Constable, Pawel Skudlarski, Robert K. Fulbright, Richard A. Bronen, Donald P. Shankweiler, Leonard Katz, Jack M. Fletcher, and John C. Gore. 1996. Cerebral organization of component processes in reading. Brain, Vol. 119, 4 (1996), 1221--1238.
[38]
Keith Rayner. 1998. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological bulletin Vol. 124, 3 (1998), 372.
[39]
Carole Rich. 2015. Writing and reporting news: A coaching method. Cengage Learning. 259 pages.
[40]
Alexandre N. Tuch, Javier A. Bargas-Avila, Klaus Opwis, and Frank H. Wilhelm. 2009. Visual complexity of websites: Effects on users' experience, physiology, performance, and memory. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 67, 9 (2009), 703 -- 715.
[41]
Ou Wu, Yunfei Chen, Bing Li, and Weiming Hu. 2011. Evaluating the visual quality of web pages using a computational aesthetic approach Proc. WSDM 2011.
[42]
Xing Yi, Liangjie Hong, Erheng Zhong, Nanthan N. Liu, and Suju Rajan. 2014. Beyond clicks: dwell time for personalization. In Proc. RecSys 2014.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A review of challenges, algorithms and evaluation methods in news recommendationJournal of Information Science10.1177/01655515241244497Online publication date: 28-Apr-2024
  • (2024)A data‐driven approach to improve online consumer subscriptions by combining data visualization and machine learning methodsInternational Journal of Consumer Studies10.1111/ijcs.1303048:2Online publication date: 29-Feb-2024
  • (2023)Scanning or Simply Unengaged in Reading? Opportune Moments for Pushed News Notifications and Their Relationship with Smartphone Users' Choice of News-reading ModesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36042687:MHCI(1-26)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2023
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
WWW '18: Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference
April 2018
2000 pages
ISBN:9781450356398
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

  • IW3C2: International World Wide Web Conference Committee

In-Cooperation

Publisher

International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee

Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland

Publication History

Published: 10 April 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. information gain
  2. online news
  3. post-click engagement
  4. reading
  5. user engagement

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

WWW '18
Sponsor:
  • IW3C2
WWW '18: The Web Conference 2018
April 23 - 27, 2018
Lyon, France

Acceptance Rates

WWW '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 170 of 1,155 submissions, 15%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)393
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)66
Reflects downloads up to 22 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)A review of challenges, algorithms and evaluation methods in news recommendationJournal of Information Science10.1177/01655515241244497Online publication date: 28-Apr-2024
  • (2024)A data‐driven approach to improve online consumer subscriptions by combining data visualization and machine learning methodsInternational Journal of Consumer Studies10.1111/ijcs.1303048:2Online publication date: 29-Feb-2024
  • (2023)Scanning or Simply Unengaged in Reading? Opportune Moments for Pushed News Notifications and Their Relationship with Smartphone Users' Choice of News-reading ModesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36042687:MHCI(1-26)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2023
  • (2023)Digital Content Profiling Based on User Engagement FeaturesInformation Systems10.1007/978-3-031-30694-5_8(91-104)Online publication date: 20-Apr-2023
  • (2022)Engagement or Knowledge Retention: Exploring Trade-offs in Promoting Discussion at News WebsitesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/35551946:CSCW2(1-38)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2022
  • (2022)Screenshot Journey Auditor: A Tool to Support Analysis of Smartphone Media Consumption Journey Using Screenshot DataCompanion Publication of the 2022 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing10.1145/3500868.3559456(110-114)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2022
  • (2022)Modeling User Engagement Profiles for Detection of Digital Subscription PropensityInformation Systems10.1007/978-3-030-95947-0_5(55-68)Online publication date: 16-Feb-2022
  • (2021)Using Interaction Data to Predict Engagement with Interactive MediaProceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia10.1145/3474085.3475631(1258-1266)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2021
  • (2021)I’m Interested, but Can/Would Only Skim It: Studying Smartphone Users’ Receptivity to News NotificationsAdjunct Proceedings of the 2021 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2021 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers10.1145/3460418.3479292(32-33)Online publication date: 21-Sep-2021
  • (2020)Post-Click Behaviors Enhanced Recommendation System2020 IEEE 21st International Conference on Information Reuse and Integration for Data Science (IRI)10.1109/IRI49571.2020.00026(128-135)Online publication date: Aug-2020
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media